World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10435x2] | The point is that previous experience with Wine shows it is not a stable platform to test on. That's why there is a discussion. |
There's no Linux port of R3. | |
Kaj 3-Feb-2009 [10437] | As I said, previous experience shows Windows is not a stable platform. What´s the point of any software development at all? |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10438] | Kaj, you're missing the point completely. Do you blame id Software if Wine doesn't run Quake 4 properly? |
Kaj 3-Feb-2009 [10439] | If it´s this difficult to report a bug, then I will refrain from it |
Graham 3-Feb-2009 [10440] | Curecode is the appropriate channel to report bugs |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10441] | Stable platform = API stable = no change in underlying behavior. For Wine, it means it should behave identically to Windows. It seems not to be the case. |
Graham 3-Feb-2009 [10442] | Henrik, what were the earlier wine issues that were fixed? |
Pekr 3-Feb-2009 [10443] | Kaj - you are just angry, that is all. Gee, so ppl complain, that there is no thing to test, and once there is an ALPHA, we hear things like "Isn't the point of REBOL to be usable?". And I thought, that you are SW developer. Beucase as such, how can you post any such sentence to Alpha SW? |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10444] | Graham, an issue with 100% CPU usage every time a GUI was invoked. |
Kaj 3-Feb-2009 [10445] | Yes, but I´m not angry about the bugs, I just got angry about the reception |
Pekr 3-Feb-2009 [10446] | Besides that - who said, that bugs are not being fixed? Just go to release page and see what bugs were fixed for what particular release. We are finally getting there, but not there. Post your finding to CureCode, mark it, and let's see how critical it is or if it could be fixed with some higher priority. What is point here? |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10447] | Graham: Carl found that some Wine libraries were of the incorrect version in the public builds. |
Graham 3-Feb-2009 [10448] | So,it was a wine issue? |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10449] | Graham, yes. |
Pekr 3-Feb-2009 [10450] | uh, on Vista and R2 I get: >> dir? %work == true >> dir? %work/ == true >> file? %work == true >> file? %work/ == true Is that correct? :-) There is a work directory on my system, so how is that "file? %work/ reports true? |
Graham 3-Feb-2009 [10451x2] | Isn't a directory also a file? |
file? looks at the datatype | |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10453] | Kaj, I understand it's very frustrating only to be able to do limited testing. Being on OSX, I have to waste a lot of resources running WinXP in VMWare to test R3. I think it's a good idea to keep some talks going with the Wine people to make sure and verify that it's a Wine bug rather than an R3 bug. This is in order to keep Wine out of Carl's hair, so to speak, so he can continue development of R3 as rapidly as possible. I deeply respect the daunting task it is to emulate the Windows API and I would not like to be in their shoes. |
Kaj 3-Feb-2009 [10454x3] | If you reread the above, you´ll see that I reported more bugs than this issue on WINE |
I´ve been muddling through bugs all night | |
In any case, by your own admission, you´re the wrong people to talk to | |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10457x2] | that's correct. |
BTW, this is probably not common knowledge, but R3 does not officially support Win95/98/ME, even if it may run there. I don't know if that may have any effect on Wine behavior. | |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10459x3] | I like the current dir? function in R3. I think it works well. |
We just need to understand how it operates in R3. It's more of an adjustment in our thinking than a problem. | |
Is it normal in R3 to get a bunch of output in the console when saving a file? save %blah "test" | |
Henrik 3-Feb-2009 [10462] | yes, that is for two reasons. when saving a file, a port is returned, which was not the case before. the other reason is that objects are now returned to the console. |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10463] | Ok, just wanted to make sure. That helps. Thanks Henrik. |
GiuseppeC 3-Feb-2009 [10464x2] | Switching from AltME to RebDev chat has been very hard for me and since I am not a core developer I will be in read only mode until the GUI version will be released. |
However I am not negative about how things are going. We finally have a pubblic alpha. an upgrade mechanism, an internal chat system. GUI is going to be developed and also documentation reviewed. | |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10466] | We already have GUI in R3 but you gotta load it first via load-gui. I know it is still in development though. |
GiuseppeC 3-Feb-2009 [10467x2] | Yes Paul I know but it is not complete and Henrik will be back to work on it in march. |
It will be the foundation for the RebDev GUI side. Everyone seems now in the same cavern where Carl retired himself. | |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10469x2] | Oh, I didn't know he was the only one working on it. |
I'm not a fan of rebdev either but I view it as the catalyst for the GUI side of it. | |
GiuseppeC 3-Feb-2009 [10471] | I suppose both Carl and Henrik ar working on it while Cyphre will be back soon to fix some lower level issues. |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10472x2] | Well the good thing is that I see lots of activity on R3. |
Let's count our blessings here. At least it is active. | |
GiuseppeC 3-Feb-2009 [10474] | However we are in the middle of a big change. Once the new messaging system and the GUI will be complete the whole speed of REBOL3 will shift up again. |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10475] | I think Carl is very excited about things right now and motivated towards getting R3 fixed, stable, enhanced, and released. |
GiuseppeC 3-Feb-2009 [10476] | Expect a 2 months where everyone involved will work in the cavern with Carl and then we will finally have something to start with seriously. |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [10477] | March is fine for me. About that time I really expect my project to be in a mature state via 2.7.6 and can then hopefully begin porting at that time. |
GiuseppeC 3-Feb-2009 [10478x3] | By now, we could only try to test REBOL3 and report bugs in CureCode. It is still a big thing. For discussion with the development team we need to use the chat system as everything else (AltME) seems abandoned. |
My project still have everything they need in REBOL2. SQLLite, REBGUI and REBOL Itself. When things will be mature I'll start to port my projects to R3. | |
Lets not forget it is a complete new beginning. While R2 is a mature man R3 is still an infant. It is nice to see lot of interest around it. This mean that the child will be well supported by an extended family of relatives ;-) | |
BrianH 3-Feb-2009 [10481x4] | Kaj, please report bugs in CureCode. And here if you like, but the important place to report them is in CureCode. If you have problems making an account on CureCode say so here or in the !CureCode group. Please mention that you are running on WINE in the bug, in case your bug is WINE-specific. We have no problems with supporting REBOL properly on WINE, but at least I can't test it since I am running Windows. |
It is easy to report bugs in CureCode, and they get reviewed, tested, discussed and eventually fixed. It is much easier to report bugs in CureCode than it is to do so here. Please don't complain about the need to report bugs - that is what alpha means. | |
It doesn't matter that WINE is not a stable platform to test on - it's fixable, whereas Windows is not. We will try to make things work. | |
However, native support for R3 on Linux and other WINE platforms will continue to be a higher priority than WINE support. | |
older newer | first last |