r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11612]
Representative of the qtask users market or the cellphone market?
BrianH
15-Feb-2009
[11613]
Both. Phones with good browsers are rare and it would cost many billions 
to change that.
Henrik
15-Feb-2009
[11614]
The iPod Touch has sold well this Christmas. It's almost hardware 
equivalent to the iPhone, so the marketshare would cover that device 
as well.
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11615]
Heh ... stimulate the economy though :)
BrianH
15-Feb-2009
[11616]
This is a little off-topic for the group though :(
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11617x2]
iPod Touch has internet connectivity?
oh yeah .. can it run R3 ? :)
BrianH
15-Feb-2009
[11619x4]
Yes, wifi
No, license restrictions.
Apple won't let any interpreters on the iPhone/Touch except the JS 
interpreter in Safari, no other exceptions.
That's why the only alternative development platform fot the iPhone 
is based on Mono: ahead-of-time compilation with static linking.
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11623]
Oh well, a R3 interpreter written in JS seems necessary then.
BrianH
15-Feb-2009
[11624]
On my todo list.
Pekr
15-Feb-2009
[11625]
R3 interpreter written in JS? :-) How fast it can be? Besides that 
- don't we have better job to do than to obey stupid Apple's licensing 
policy? Why not to use devices like HTC Touch Pro for e.g. then?
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11626x2]
Pekr, Brian has a very very long todo list :)
IOT, he'll never get to it.
Reichart
15-Feb-2009
[11628x2]
We offer a cool HTML only interface, this ensures we work woth almost 
everything (we call this Amish Quilt)
We plan to offer a step up which offers "some" JS"
Then there is Quilt (JS + HTML only).


Several people are not playing with iPhone only client applications 
that will interface to Qtask.
www.iqtask.com
Pekr
15-Feb-2009
[11630]
Graham - the thing is, that when I proposed REBOL being ported to 
JAVA VM, to get to platforms where REBOL presence is lacking, the 
idea was dismissed and native port of REBOL proposed for target HW. 
Now just because of some licensing description we are about to port 
REBOL to even slower VM? Screw Apple then. In few months I buy HTC 
Touch Pro or Touch Diamond, Windows Mobile based phone. Then there 
is going to be Android phones (first on market is already here), 
Palm Treo, Linux based (Open Moko) - so, there are some choices out 
there ...
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11631]
Java VM sounds good
Pekr
15-Feb-2009
[11632]
Is there JAVA on iPhone? That could be an interim solution then ...
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11633]
It can be done ...
Pekr
15-Feb-2009
[11634x2]
But - the best aproach (because I don't believe someone will port 
REBOL neither to JS nor JAVA), is to imo do dual interface. One in 
VID, other one for web. We will see, how it could be automated.
E.g. JAVA GWT does that - you can have JAVA native GUI, as well as 
very good browser based one - http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/
Graham
15-Feb-2009
[11636]
Looks pretty good
PeterWood
15-Feb-2009
[11637]
Pekr: Delphi (and Lazarus) most definititely separate the description 
of the GUI and the code. They are described in different, though 
simiiar langauges and saved in separate files; .dfm for the GUI description, 
.dpr (or .pas) for the code.
BrianH
15-Feb-2009
[11638x5]
No Java on iPhone - same license restriction. Mono's there though, 
and (in theory) you could use IKVM.NET to put Java on that.
I expect that my work on some of my todo list will take the form 
of helping others do it - it's more of a to-get-done list :)
I don't think the DLR can run statically compiled, so that route's 
out.
Also (in theory) you could use GCJ or Excellcior to compile for the 
iPhone, but not their interpreters. No dynamic code allowed.
However, I was not precise enough about my todo list. No REBOL interpreters 
are on it - I want a REBOL-to-JS compiler.
Henrik
16-Feb-2009
[11643]
Who wrote the JS REBOL interpreter I tried a year ago? Gabriele?
BrianH
16-Feb-2009
[11644]
I think so.
Kaj
16-Feb-2009
[11645]
Yep
Mchean
17-Feb-2009
[11646]
I have a question about the Gui_Basics example in the R3 docs.  The 
ex. under Adding styles won't work for me.  title "Opinion Survey" 
comes back with title having no value - this after load-gui
Claude
18-Feb-2009
[11647x4]
hello,
i try to load rebDB-203 in R3 .................          but R3 return 
a error when a try to do a "db-create my-table [id date name]"   
   with  >> db-create "my-table" [id date nom]

** Script error: db-create does not allow string! for its 'table 
argument

** Note: use WHY? for more about this error
This is just to ask if someone has already try to bring tools like 
reddb on R3
rebdb !!!
PeterWood
18-Feb-2009
[11651]
You got further than I when I triead:
>> do %/Users/peter/Code/Library/Rebol/RebDB-203/db.r

** Syntax error: Invalid "string" -- {"Ashley G. TrŸter"}

** Where: to unless load case applier do
** Near: (line 3) Owner:		"Ashley G. TrŸter"
Claude
18-Feb-2009
[11652]
i copy the script and remove the header
PeterWood
18-Feb-2009
[11653]
I don't think anybody has looked at converting tools to R3 yet as 
it is still too early for them.
Claude
18-Feb-2009
[11654x2]
i do after if a load %my-copy-db.r
the function db-create is ok then !-) ............but need much more 
to be good for us
Henrik
18-Feb-2009
[11656]
In general you would be very lucky if a fairly large R2 product works 
directly under R3.
Claude
18-Feb-2009
[11657x4]
i thing it is important for every body who use rebdb !!!!
or perhaps R3 guru would give us a better way to do this ;-)
is the same for rebgui............il would like to see a R3
a R3 demo that do all rebgui do
PeterWood
18-Feb-2009
[11661]
The table name you supply to db-create should be a word! not a string!

>> ? db-create

USAGE:

	DB-CREATE 'table columns

DESCRIPTION:

	Creates a table.

	DB-CREATE is a function value
.

ARGUMENTS:

	table (word!)
	
	columns -- Column names (block!)