World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12958] | I see. |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [12959] | how can I increase my (page)rank :) |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12960] | you can't. you need a higher ranked person to do that. I'll see what can be done. |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [12961] | ok, no hurry.. I really have to leave now anyway |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12962] | you should be able to read other messages though |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [12963] | I will come by in the evening and try again.. otherwise in next days |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [12964x2] | I was going to paste the code to Janko in a private message but AltME can't handle Mac line endings. Perhaps somebody running on Winodws could post it to him. |
Has anybody tried running a server port on Linux? | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12966] | I've altered Janko's rank to 20, although I'm not sure it's enough yet. |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [12967x2] | just one more question ... does the async networking on R3 work as it was shown on wiki for a while (the old one had examples) |
uh, it works now | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12969] | you see the file? |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [12970] | it listed it in console.. can I save it somehow? |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12971] | yes, "get 3365" |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [12972] | aha, thanks |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12973x2] | I think ports have not changed for over a year, so examples and docs should be up to date. |
PeterWood, chat still segfaults here on OSX, so I can't test the bug. | |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [12975x2] | Henrik. Try re-starting Rebol and then use chat. I have found that chat only segfaults once a certain amount of memory has been used. |
What version of Mac OS X are you running? | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12977x2] | Leopard and it usually segfaults right after starting R3. |
I'm going to try Instruments, just out of curiosity. | |
Graham 9-Apr-2009 [12979x3] | I'm not expecting a usable R3 for another year or more. I am really busy workting my project in R2, as i suspect are many others. |
Maybe once we have a usuable GUI wrapped around dev chat it might be easier to follow what is going on ... but it's a bit of a black box to me now. | |
I had assumed that since the VID+ was being worked on, that core was in great shape ... oh well. | |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [12982] | Henrik. I only get the seg fault if I use a lot of memory or try to use a scheme before running chat. |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12983x2] | I get a crash immediately. Do you start it from terminal or Finder? |
hmm. Instruments runs R3, but doesn't open a console, so it isn't interactive. | |
shadwolf 9-Apr-2009 [12985] | i will give it to you henrik |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [12986] | I start from terminal |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12987x2] | Attaching Instruments to a running R3 works. But it shows no leaks when entering Chat. |
PeterWood, wow that worked. I usually start it from Finder. | |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [12989] | Don't get to excited you can still get segfaults. |
shadwolf 9-Apr-2009 [12990x2] | hum i don't remember my password lol |
that's what happends when you test something once and get borred by its usage | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12992] | PeterWood, I get a different crash from what you had before now. "N" when you are guest, right after starting chat. |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [12993x2] | Try this: chat 3415 more 3365 |
..when you are logged in, | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [12995] | Will test in a minute. I haven't found out how to return to Guest state again. |
shadwolf 9-Apr-2009 [12996x5] | ok i just remember i recieve a mail with the damn password |
that what u want ? | |
3365 ? | |
shadwolf:R3/OS-Targets/OSX>> more 3365 ** Script error: submit-of? does not allow none! for its fid argument ** Where: case all submit-of? case what-file? more-file parse try either either forever command-loop make context do catch applier do try chat ** Near: case [ is-submit? msg [msg] is-name? msg [submit-of?... --- Note: unexpected error logged to error-log.txt | |
is that good ? | |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [13001] | It's the same error that I get. Now try the same command from the top level >Top >More 3365 |
shadwolf 9-Apr-2009 [13002x2] | more works but the display buffer of my consol is to tiny to get the whole script |
so i imagine get will do it ? | |
Sunanda 9-Apr-2009 [13004] | shadwolf: <ok so hash! is gone perfect no one used it anyway> A quick search on REBOL.org shows 25 scripts using hash! and/or to-hash That's not many. But it is not zero. And it is not perfect for those with applications that depend on those scripts. Clearlt, retaining hash! is not a priority for RT, and that argument has been and gone. It is not a decision I am happy with .... which indicates my priorities are not completely aligned with RT's. That puts me in the same position as most REBOL developers :-( |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [13005] | yes |
shadwolf 9-Apr-2009 [13006] | http://shadwolf.free.fr/port-http.r |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [13007] | Henrik: yes to what? |
older newer | first last |