r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12958]
I see.
Janko
9-Apr-2009
[12959]
how can I increase my (page)rank :)
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12960]
you can't. you need a higher ranked person to do that. I'll see what 
can be done.
Janko
9-Apr-2009
[12961]
ok, no hurry.. I really have to leave now anyway
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12962]
you should be able to read other messages though
Janko
9-Apr-2009
[12963]
I will come by in the evening and try again.. otherwise in next days
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[12964x2]
I was going to paste the code to Janko in a private message but AltME 
can't handle Mac line endings. Perhaps somebody running on Winodws 
could post it to him.
Has anybody tried running a server port on Linux?
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12966]
I've altered Janko's rank to 20, although I'm not sure it's enough 
yet.
Janko
9-Apr-2009
[12967x2]
just one more question ... does the async networking on R3 work as 
it was shown on wiki for a while (the old one had examples)
uh, it works now
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12969]
you see the file?
Janko
9-Apr-2009
[12970]
it listed it in console.. can I save it somehow?
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12971]
yes, "get 3365"
Janko
9-Apr-2009
[12972]
aha, thanks
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12973x2]
I think ports have not changed for over a year, so examples and docs 
should be up to date.
PeterWood, chat still segfaults here on OSX, so I can't test the 
bug.
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[12975x2]
Henrik. Try re-starting Rebol and then use chat. I have found that 
chat only segfaults once a certain amount of memory has been used.
What version of Mac OS X are you running?
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12977x2]
Leopard and it usually segfaults right after starting R3.
I'm going to try Instruments, just out of curiosity.
Graham
9-Apr-2009
[12979x3]
I'm not expecting a usable R3 for another year or more.  I am really 
busy workting my project in R2, as i suspect are many others.
Maybe once we have a usuable GUI wrapped around dev chat it might 
be easier to follow what is going on ... but it's a bit of a black 
box to me now.
I had assumed that since the VID+ was being worked on, that core 
was in great shape ... oh well.
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[12982]
Henrik. I only get the seg fault if I use a lot of memory or try 
to use a scheme before running chat.
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12983x2]
I get a crash immediately. Do you start it from terminal or Finder?
hmm. Instruments runs R3, but doesn't open a console, so it isn't 
interactive.
shadwolf
9-Apr-2009
[12985]
i will give it to you henrik
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[12986]
I start from terminal
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12987x2]
Attaching Instruments to a running R3 works. But it shows no leaks 
when entering Chat.
PeterWood, wow that worked. I usually start it from Finder.
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[12989]
Don't get to excited you can still get segfaults.
shadwolf
9-Apr-2009
[12990x2]
hum i don't remember my password lol
that's what happends when you test something once and get borred 
by its usage
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12992]
PeterWood, I get a different crash from what you had before now. 
"N" when you are guest, right after starting chat.
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[12993x2]
Try this:

chat
3415
more 3365
..when you are logged in,
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[12995]
Will test in a minute. I haven't found out how to return to Guest 
state again.
shadwolf
9-Apr-2009
[12996x5]
ok i just remember i recieve a mail with the damn password
that what u want ?
3365 ?
shadwolf:R3/OS-Targets/OSX>> more 3365

** Script error: submit-of? does not allow none! for its fid argument

** Where: case all submit-of? case what-file? more-file parse try 
either either
forever command-loop make context do catch applier do try chat
** Near: case [
    is-submit? msg [msg]
    is-name? msg [submit-of?...

--- Note: unexpected error logged to error-log.txt
is that good ?
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[13001]
It's the same error that I get. 

Now try the same command from the top level

>Top
>More 3365
shadwolf
9-Apr-2009
[13002x2]
more works but the  display buffer of my consol is to tiny to get 
the whole script
so i imagine get will do it ?
Sunanda
9-Apr-2009
[13004]
shadwolf: <ok so hash! is gone perfect no one used it anyway>

A quick search on REBOL.org shows 25 scripts using hash! and/or to-hash

That's not many. But it is not zero. And it is not perfect for those 
with applications that depend on those scripts.

Clearlt, retaining hash! is not a priority for RT, and that argument 
has been and gone.

It is not a decision I am happy with .... which indicates my priorities 
are not completely aligned with RT's. That puts me in the same position 
as most REBOL developers :-(
Henrik
9-Apr-2009
[13005]
yes
shadwolf
9-Apr-2009
[13006]
http://shadwolf.free.fr/port-http.r
PeterWood
9-Apr-2009
[13007]
Henrik: yes to what?