World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
shadwolf 9-Apr-2009 [13108x5] | hum having the dialect doesn't' means you have teh proper low level set of drawing function to handle properly the text rendering |
well i imagine that since the TDM (Text Dialect Markup ) exists than AGG will follow and offer brand new things to handle conveniently the texte (and please please forget once for all about teh caret system please i beg you T___T) | |
what is in my opinion import in text handeling is to be able to get heigh and width taken be each letter or each set of letter (can be a word or a line ... | |
for example actually we are able to handle properly the text motion because we use fie font with a fixed size but this because what we want is to handle text in color and not mixe differnt kind of font styles and size like it would be the case for a MakeDoc format richtext rendering /editing widget | |
sure in our area-tc taht would be a plus to be able to handle ctrl+wheel action to grow shrink the text size (like you can do in any modern web browser for example) or to be able to set through a config panel the font size and type of your choice | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [13113x3] | Solved the other bug by commenting out one line of code. :-) |
do http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/chat.r | |
If I can get a couple of confirmations that the bugs are gone, I'll submit them to curecode. | |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [13116x2] | I haven't been able to generate the segfault with your version in the way that I could with the live version. |
and the "more 3365" bug is gone too. | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [13118x2] | Interesting. The changes are quite small. |
actually, it could be because mine is not compressed. | |
PeterWood 9-Apr-2009 [13120] | That's a possibility. I'll try to compress your script tomorrow if I have time (it's late here) and see if it segfaults. |
Nicolas 9-Apr-2009 [13121x3] | I'm trying to sort files by modification but it's not working. sort/compare files: read %/c/ by-date: func [a b] [to-logic attempt [greater? modified? a modified? b]] |
sort/compare files :by-date | |
does anyone use this type of code? | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [13124] | What exactly does Pending mean in Curecode? |
kcollins 9-Apr-2009 [13125x2] | Nicolas, sort/compare does not work in R3. This bug is in Curecode: http://curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=161&cursor=8 |
It would be nice to see that one fixed, especially if it is easy to fix. | |
BrianH 9-Apr-2009 [13127x5] | Pending means someone (me, usually) has already written a fix and submitted it to DevBase, but it's not built into R3 yet. |
Carl's fixes don't get marked pending, he just builds them. | |
I don't understand a lot of these complaints where people say they can't contribute because REBOL "isn't open source". Large chunks of R3 were written by me, and every line I wrote was open source, freely available in DevBase. | |
A lot of REBOL is written in REBOL, and all of that is open source (in theory). The source is all in DevBase. | |
By the way, hash! being gone is not even in the top 100 drastically incompatible changes in R3. It's a new language :) | |
Henrik 9-Apr-2009 [13132] | BrianH, then my fixes fit under the Pending category :-) |
BrianH 9-Apr-2009 [13133x3] | Yup, as long as they are submitted to DevBase. I mark fixes as pending before they are even accepted in DevBase, so pending doesn't mean inevitable. Some pending fixes have been dismissed (mostly requests for new functions). |
I keep the new functions in my archives for later submission to the community library, if they are worth saving. | |
The function with the most incompatible changes in R3 is LOAD. There were many errors in R2's LOAD that have been fixed in R3. Almost every feature of LOAD is different, in sometimes subtle, sometimes drastic ways. | |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [13136] | I am happy that you guys exist :) |
BrianH 9-Apr-2009 [13137x6] | Graham, VID+ was being worked on in order to get the core in good shape, by uncovering bugs and helping set priorities for fixing them. Now we are fixing the most important core bugs, including the one that has been blocking infrastructure development the most: the lack of a decent, working module system. |
Now the thing blocking us is the lack of a multitasking model, so we are (mostly Carl is) implementing what we need to get multitasking working: memory protection and a new system object. It looks like we will have a shared memory model after all, rather than a shared-nothing approach. It's still up in the air though. | |
PeterWood, don't store the associated values in a map! as #[none} - that removes them from the map!. Use #[true] instead. | |
Shadwolf, the design of the map! type is pretty-well finalized already. It's the implementation that still needs work :( | |
Also, don't base serious development on alpha software unless you can afford to finish your development after it's no longer alpha :) | |
Janko, thanks :) | |
Janko 9-Apr-2009 [13143x3] | wow, now you are focusing on multitasking.. that is a big core thing ... if there will be shared memory model we can probably build various other abstractions on top of it (I did observe some backslash vs pure message passing / actors lately also -- especially for concurrency on the same computer / cpu ) .. this is interesting thinking IMHO http://clojure.org/state"Message Passing and Actors" under "I chose not to use the Erlang-style actor model for same-process state management in Clojure for several reasons:" |
well he uses quite complex thing in form of persistent (functional -imutable (versioned)) data structures... that is probably something too complex to focus on now.. but if we have simopler / more primitive means of concurency we can probably build stuff on top of it .. and even try with some fancy data structures (factor folks were playing with them so they are doable) | |
persistent here doesn't mean it's in a db or a file but it means that data structures in clojure are immutable and theoretically when you change one you always get a new copy so threads can't break stuff to other threads in the middle of process, but the catcth is that that copy is not really a copy (which would be simple and *expensive*) but same structure reused with some different paths so that it is different ( I hope I made any sense ) .. he explained it in some video very nicely | |
Cyphre 9-Apr-2009 [13146x2] | Shadwolf: re R3 richtext; R3 will have the posibility to get all useful information at the font glyph level. The richtext module is able to give us all that info internally. We only need to design interface at the Rebol language level. BTW even in current R3 version you can get the proper width/height using SIZE-TEXT command. But I believe the final version will offer even more. |
(Here you can see what can be done with the current R3 in ~5kb script. http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/stuff/r3-richtext.jpg) | |
BrianH 9-Apr-2009 [13148x2] | New SYSTEM object: http://www.rebol.net/wiki/R3_Releases- This is what I've been waiting for :) |
Most of the map! bugs were fixed too :) | |
Pekr 10-Apr-2009 [13150x2] | It is just yet another version of system object. For me still kind of chaotic. |
Devbase contains detailed list of stuff which is going to be a 3.0 release. The link is not supposed to be made webpublic though .... | |
Ammon 10-Apr-2009 [13152] | Why can't a map! be sorted? |
Alan 10-Apr-2009 [13153x2] | seeing that I have Windows 7 running under VmPlayer, I decided to try the r3 beta and can report that I does work :) The only problem was with the demo/Reactor. When I tried on open an examples file,Windows complained about the file type. The same thing does not happen on XP Pro ? |
I =it | |
BrianH 10-Apr-2009 [13155x3] | Ammon, map! doesn't even have a order at all, just a temporary display order. It's a set of pairs. |
Set in the mathematical sense. | |
The map! type is not a series, it's more like an object with different inclusion rules. No order, no position. | |
older newer | first last |