World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Ladislav 29-Apr-2009 [13708] | algorithm - sorry, I mean argument |
Pekr 29-Apr-2009 [13709] | It would be good to probably ask Carl on Chat, no? |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13710x2] | Gabriele, thanks, I trust your memory better than mine about this. This is definitely a good reason why Carl is trying to do Rebin before he releases the host code - reducing direct access to internal data structures. |
So why is 'pick so much slower? It might be because of the overhead of looking up the word 'pick to get the function :pick every time, same as in R2. It's not that PICK is slower, it's that path decoding is drastically faster in R3 than it is in R2. | |
[unknown: 5] 29-Apr-2009 [13712x2] | Is REBOL3 going to integrate into the browser at some point? |
It seems that was always promised but I don't see where that is becoming a reality. | |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13714] | Remember that you asked that question before you ever complain about how we've been working on security lately instead of (pet bug). We've been catching a lot of flack lately for working on changes to the security model, changes that are necessary to make a browser plugin that won't get marked as malware. This was the original reason why R3 was started :) |
Henrik 29-Apr-2009 [13715] | Ladislav, I'd like to make your article on Identity into a cookbook recipe, so it gets an official listing in the cookbooks list, so people can find it. Where do you think it would fit on this page: http://www.rebol.net/cookbooks/ |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13716] | arg yeah rebol plugin is important and it's a bad thing if people considers it as a malware T__T |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13717] | Recent Flash releases are the thing to beat. If we aren't at least as secure as Flash, consider R3 to be malware. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13718] | impossible cause rebol is nice like a puppy :P |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13719] | Remember what puppies can be trained to do :( |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13720x2] | well ... if you want to screw Pcs why using rebol anything else is already enought to screw a poor PC |
I mean Vb script for example lol ... well ... | |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13722] | Not my PC :) |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13723x2] | Mine neithere i removed VB from my windows :P |
i have the same XP since 2002 ... T___T Microsoft is borring | |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13725] | Running a vbscript is not the same thing as running a vbscript in a browser. Browsers are for running malware, hopefully without getting caught by it. Hence the sandboxing, security restrictions, etc. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13726] | brianH the solution is to create our own kick ass browser in rebol :P |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13727] | It's on my todo list, no html though. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13728] | this way no need of having to maintain 3 x3 rebol plugins ... lot of saved time for Carl i will say |
Henrik 29-Apr-2009 [13729] | I think ReBrowse will become more important than a browser plugin. |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13730x2] | There's no point to creating a web browser, even a kick-ass one. Look at Chrome: It is better in almost every way, but it only has < 2% market share (when last I checked). If you create a new browser, people will still use their old, crappy IE or Firefox. |
That's why ReBrowse won't be a web (html) browser. | |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13732] | Henrik: rebrowse vs plugin.... entirely different targets. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13733x2] | BrianH ... when what screw the fucking browser statistics is the fact 95% of computers are wndows based and 100% of them comes with IE ... |
but that doesn't means I use it (I use chrome, opera and firefox) | |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13735] | and unless the web gets replaced by rebol, the plugin will always be more important to "the industry" I mean, to get others to use rebol in THEIR environment. which is the biggest weak spot of rebol. it is Hermetic. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13736] | Maxim web replaced by rebol yeah that's the idea brillant ^^ |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13737x3] | you can't tell a company that invested several years to start over from scratch. it has to be able to migrate without changing the habits... rebol has to sink into the other model first, then slowly, if it worth it, people will start putting rebol in the center and eventually, something like rebrowse can replace the current framework or maybe even live besides it while the migration takes place. |
I've suffered of trying to get rebol INTO companies and it never works. there is too much ground work to do, it costs a lot of money. | |
a few throw-away utilities isn't the same as building the company IT over rebol. its an entirely different ball-game. | |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13740x2] | yes we can :P YES WE CAN :P and i'm sure all of them will really like to do it ;P |
the whole IT industry -> But damn but how but ... buuuuuuuuut so many years spent doing borring things now that we discovered rebol our world have changed ! | |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13742] | R3, will allow us (finally) to merge rebol INTO other stuff, so it can become the controler for lower logic, but when that starts, people will usually start writting everything in rebol... cause its just plain productive. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13743] | like Lua .... but ppl will say but Lua already do it and it's better damn people ... |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13744x3] | Ever tried to use rebol in a company that has only .net, python, or java code? good luck. it takes weeks before you can use most of the DB stuff they have built up, because there are sooo many modules out there, and they have huge frameworks, which actually DO more stuff than rebol . rebuilding those libs is not even always possible.... |
ex integrating DirectX/OpenGL into view... nope. loading dll classes... nope... etc, etc, etc. | |
but R3 will change all that :-) | |
Henrik 29-Apr-2009 [13747] | http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0194.html SELECT/SKIP behavior discussion needed now. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13748x2] | comment posted i don't know if that will make any sens ... |
select/skip b 3 returning 20 only is an aberation ... that's not what we expect ... | |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13750x2] | It's what I expected, but I've never used SELECT/skip in R2. The R2 behavior sounds better to me. |
It sounds silly, but after 9 years there are still parts of REBOL I've never used :( | |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13752] | but the skip becomes pretty useless, as you can get the inner records of the skip. |
shadwolf 29-Apr-2009 [13753] | BrianH hum same for me ... |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13754x2] | the /skip in many functions are implied records... and the reason they are there... not getting the record as a return values... is an oxymoron IMHO |
I still discover new functions after 9 years too :-) | |
BrianH 29-Apr-2009 [13756] | Maxim, are you in favor of the R2 behavior or the current R3 behavior? Or something else? |
Maxim 29-Apr-2009 [13757] | R2 |
older newer | first last |