r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Maxim
29-Apr-2009
[13867x2]
you have been talking about the actual /skip parameter value, and 
all along I was talking about the effect of using /skip which causes 
the function to go outside of bounds of the series based on the skip 
size... 

doh!   hahahaha
I was so off, I could have landed in ireland, while trying to go 
to the corner store!  ;-)
BrianH
29-Apr-2009
[13869x2]
No, I got that about your example. The behavior you describe was 
deliberately chosen.
The behavior that Henrik is concerned with is /skip lengths < 1. 
MOVE was designed to just up that to one, DWIM.
Maxim
29-Apr-2009
[13871x4]
but *I* didn't get your point  ;-)

/skip size < 1 should effectively just be bound to 1


as long as its explicitely documented.   there is no real use in 
/skip < 1
and I understand that adding too much verification to series handling 
code really slows the whole a lot.
cause its exponential in the long run.  1 % becomes 1.5 then 2.  
the slowdown rate accelerates as mezz code uses other mezz code.
its like when I discovered that using 'RETURN was slowing down some 
code I had by more than 20%!

is 'RETURN any faster in R3, btw?
BrianH
29-Apr-2009
[13875]
The problem is that DIFFERENCE/skip < 1 generates an error, and every 
other function /skip < 1 hangs. So the question is whether they should 
*all* be changed to act like MOVE (silently DWIM), or all be changed 
to act like DIFFERENCE (generate an error).
Maxim
29-Apr-2009
[13876]
tough call, but if it can't lead to data corruption, I'd say the 
later.
BrianH
29-Apr-2009
[13877]
No, RETURN, EXIT, BREAK, CONTINUE and error throws are just as slow 
in R3. It's the setjmp/longjmp exception frame overhead.
Henrik
30-Apr-2009
[13878x2]
Finally some simple thread reading ability in Chat:

3928

lr will display all messages related to that thread.

j will jump to the previous message in the thread.
Correction. lr lists all messages previous to the current one, not 
all messages.
Sunanda
1-May-2009
[13880]
It's10 years (to the month)  from this slashdotting:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/05/14/1921231


If REBOL3 got slashdotted, what are the huge milestones that should 
show up as progress?
Pekr
1-May-2009
[13881]
There's no R3 yet. In few months, maybe. There is many usefull changes 
in it compared to R2, R3 fixes everything we wished for for so long. 
I don't understand what you mean by "milestone" here ...
Mchean
1-May-2009
[13882]
wow 10 years
Henrik
2-May-2009
[13883]
Progress milestones:

Single graphics engine
VID3.4
Unicode
Tasks
Modules
Built-in chat system
Built-in open source management

Completely redesigned ports (fully documented and ready to use, you 
protocol writers)

When finished:


Fixing almost every deficiency that R2 has through 10 years of use 
by expert developers.
Gabriele
2-May-2009
[13884]
I hope you never put "built-in chat system" as a milestone on Slashdot...
Henrik
2-May-2009
[13885x5]
so which other language has a direct hotline to the main developer 
in the console?
But... it doesn't matter. The Slashdot crowd will laugh at anything 
thrown at them. Then there will be a few comments from developers. 
Then there will be comments like "but it's just like LISP or Scheme". 
It will be ridiculed no matter how well we do.
In general, it is a much better idea to do marketing on ReBrowse. 
People will understand what it is. The right people will want to 
learn how it's built.
The DRAW documentation has been overwritten in Docbase with an empty 
page. Document name collision?
http://www.rebol.net/wiki/Draw
BrianH
2-May-2009
[13890]
Don't put tasks on the list - they are due for a redesign. Otherwise, 
cool :)
Pekr
2-May-2009
[13891x4]
Gabriele - why not? The chat system is more powerfull than that of 
AltME, and I find AltME usefull, although it has its limitations. 
Once we create GUI for it, it will allow for some nice simple IM 
stuff. Why do you think SlashDot ppl would have problem with it?
Btw - who cares of SlahDots at all? I don't visit if for so long 
already. Those ppl are real idiots ...
BrianH: what are your plans on task related stuff? Do you mean reworking 
highere level, or even low level? So far R3 uses threads, no? Are 
we after Eiffel model?
Found this presentation - http://www.cse.yorku.ca/~eiffel/cs_eiffel/scoop_slides/Concurrency.ppt
Izkata
2-May-2009
[13895]
At least don't call it a "chat system" without the description "direct 
hotline to the main developer", as that line would stand out and 
make people think it's a joke
BrianH
2-May-2009
[13896x3]
So far, R3 tasks don't work properly and should be considered a placeholder. 
We can't do a proper task model until there are changes to the basic 
semantics of REBOL. Fortunately most of those changes were done in 
the last month.
Main developers. Carl isn't the only one working on R3. Good to emphasize 
that too.
Pekr, the concurrency model to beat nowadays in the Erlang model, 
not Eiffel.
Henrik
2-May-2009
[13899]
Perhaps thorough wiki-based documentation should be mentioned as 
well.
Will
3-May-2009
[13900]
could this be helpful in R3? http://www.gearman.org/doku.php
BrianH
4-May-2009
[13901x2]
Steeve, apparently Carl is working on vector! for the next release. 
Enjoy :)
Ladislav, I implemented your proposed changes to FUNCTOR, then enhanced 
them. New versions posted to DevBase. Enjoy :)
amacleod
4-May-2009
[13903]
Any specs on MakeDoc3...
i do not see anything in the Wiki about it..
BrianH
4-May-2009
[13904]
Well, it appears that Carl has handled *all* of the vector! bugs 
today. It looks like another good release is coming this week.
Henrik
5-May-2009
[13905]
and almost all skip bugs too
BrianH
5-May-2009
[13906]
Except MOVE/skip - I did that one :)
Henrik
5-May-2009
[13907]
we are generally ending up with error for skip < 1?
Pekr
5-May-2009
[13908x2]
How do you know? CureCode reports?
Is Vector really so important? I am just asking, as I don't precisely 
understand, what is the datatype good for, except one note from Carl, 
when I requested some better binary conversions, so that he said 
that it should be available via the cector! type.
Maxim
5-May-2009
[13910]
for one, arrays of tightly-packed values we can use in external calls 
directly... like matrix transformations.
BrianH
5-May-2009
[13911x2]
It's good for speed and memory saving, and better binary conversions. 
Once we have vectors, we will have less people complaining about 
the lack of rebcode, except for the people who never take good enough 
for an answer :(
And yes, Carl marks the native changes as done in CureCode the moment 
he gets a working build. I mark mezzanine changes as pending as soon 
as they are submitted to DevBase, then as build when they are released.
Henrik
5-May-2009
[13913]
Perhaps vector is a requirement for rebin.
BrianH
5-May-2009
[13914]
Sorry, Carl marks them as "built", even before they are released. 
A release usally comes within a day of that.
Maxim
5-May-2009
[13915x2]
this also means we should be able to use STL  in rebol   :-)
so we can do array transformations in REAL TIME for things like polygons 
and 3d objects  :-)