World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13935x3] | CALL works correctly on Windows. The behavior you describe in ticket 757 is by design. See the comments for that ticket. |
The Mac version should work like the Windows version does. | |
I am not assuming that it does though - I can't test it. | |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13938x2] | The mac version appears to be working. At least call "ls" gives me a directory listing. |
and returns none | |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13940] | Could you post system/options from R3 on Mac? Just run R3 and type in system/options |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13941x2] | I can't paste here, as copy/paste is broken. Will be a couple of minutes... |
http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/sysops.txt | |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13943] | I look forward to AltME 3. |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13944] | I look forward to a VMWare with working copy/paste :-/ |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13945] | Does LAUNCH work for you? |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13946x2] | It launches a script alright, but am not sure what proper behavior would be for returning. |
NONE is returned, even though the script itself returns an integer. I suppose that's correct? | |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13948x2] | Yeah. CALL doesn't return a value yet. I'm waiting for the host source before I make proposals. |
Or rather, CALL retrns none. | |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13950] | LAUNCH also returns none. |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13951] | >> source launch launch: make function! [[ {Runs a script as a separate process; return immediately.} script [file! string! none!] "The name of the script" /args arg [string! block! none!] "Arguments to the script" /local exe ][ if file? script [script: to-local-file clean-path script] exe: to-local-file system/options/boot args: to-string reduce [{"} exe {" "} script {" }] if arg [append args arg] call args ]] |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13952] | oh |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13953] | I see bugs already. LAUNCH could use a revamp like LOAD. |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13954] | could you explain? |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13955] | Not correct for script = none. Might be some other tweaks too. |
Graham 6-May-2009 [13956x2] | Does R3 have a way to launch a Rebol console? |
apart from calling the R3 binary. | |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13958x2] | LAUNCH, perhaps? |
I don't get the question, sorry. Please explain what you want. | |
Graham 6-May-2009 [13960x3] | sometimes you want to start a Rebol console from an encapped application. |
but you don't want to have to need to have rebol.exe locally. | |
That can be used to debug the application with access to all the variables etc. | |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13963] | Encapping is going to be different in R3, as is the console. It is intended that a graphical console will be developed, and callable from any graphical host. Hosts will be the new encapped apps. |
Graham 6-May-2009 [13964] | a graphical console will be good. |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13965] | We want our REPL :) |
Graham 6-May-2009 [13966] | How is error handling handled? |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13967] | I suppose that restricting console access for encapped apps would involve simply not including console code? |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13968x2] | Similar to R2, though the errors start disarmed and need to be armed with DO. CAUSE-ERROR wraps this. |
Henrik, sure :) | |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13970] | I have some radical ideas for a console. Carl will hate them. :-) |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13971] | Carl doesn't have to use them - behold the power of modules. |
Henrik 6-May-2009 [13972] | That's good. Perhaps for R3/Plus |
Rebolek 6-May-2009 [13973x4] | Ah, vector! fixed, great! :) |
#460 not fixed | |
Now it's not possible to make signed/unsigned vectors using "make vector! [- 16 integer! 100]" ? Or is the syntax different? I cannot find it anywhere. | |
Ah, #460 is not fixed because maximum-of doesn't work at all. This should be first line in the 'maximum-of function: "if not skip [size: 1]" | |
Pekr 6-May-2009 [13977] | Rebolek - by testing in console - you have wrong order of arguments, try: make vector! [integer! 16 100] make vector! [unsigned integer! 16 100] ; there was change from hyphen to work "unsigned", dunno why - http://curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=350 |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13978x3] | The new syntax for unsigned vectors is to use the 'unsigned word, not the '+ word. The optional '- word for signed vectors is gone too. |
The reason why is because people didn't understand that '+ was for unsigned, and '- was forr signed. | |
Bug #460 was a FORSKIP bug, not a MAXIMUM-OF bug. FORSKIP now works with vectors, so the bug is now fixed. | |
Pekr 6-May-2009 [13981] | why + was for unsigned and not the reverse? :-) |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13982] | Are you aware of any negative unsigned numbers? :) |
Pekr 6-May-2009 [13983] | I don't work at that level of REBOL. So we now have vector! datatype mostly fixed. One thing I don't understand is, that we are heading for performance, and then we can see minimum-of and maximum-of becoming mezzanines. The other thing is - what now? What is now available at practical level? What can we do with vector! type? |
BrianH 6-May-2009 [13984] | They can be mezzanines and still be as fast because FORSKIP is now native. Making the looping functions native makes REBOL faster overall. One thing people don't get is that mezzannes can be really fast in R3. |
older newer | first last |