r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Mchean
8-May-2009
[14117x2]
I have no knowledge of how the reader interprets the rss, but its 
the only feed of 20 which shows up this way, which is not very conducive 
or complementary
think i should mention it over on the r3 chat?
Henrik
8-May-2009
[14119]
I don't think there is a big chance it will be fixed by Carl right 
now. However, if you get the source and provide your own fix, it's 
likely that he would use it.
Mchean
8-May-2009
[14120]
that's what i thought, unfortunately i don't have the html knowledge. 
  I wonder is anyone using any other news readers?
Henrik
8-May-2009
[14121]
I use Safari's RSS reader and it's badly formatted there too.
Mchean
8-May-2009
[14122]
ok so he's probably aware of it
BrianH
8-May-2009
[14123]
I was going to compare the output of his feed to that of Monologue, 
and make it match. Monologue works in Google Reader.
Mchean
8-May-2009
[14124]
thanks BrianH, for my edification could you put some message about 
what was needed?
Anton
9-May-2009
[14125]
What happened to the system/user object?  I just downloaded Rebol 
3 a-51 and it's not there anymore.
BrianH
9-May-2009
[14126x2]
The system/user object was removed in the great system reorg of alpha 
46. The only setting in system/user that was of any use was system/user/home. 
That setting is likely to be put back somewhere else, probably in 
system/options with a different name.
There are going to be some more changes to system - like removing 
system/words - but most of the changes were done in alpha 46.
Anton
10-May-2009
[14128]
BrianH, thanks for the info.
Louis
11-May-2009
[14129]
ManuM, thanks!
Pekr
11-May-2009
[14130x2]
hmm, http coming as first module - working in next version ...
Brian - Carl did some change to module creation and referred to objects 
too. I know that you are after context spec changes, so just a reminder 
to watch Carl's changes :-)
BrianH
11-May-2009
[14132]
I noticed that. I'm giving it some thought - it seems like a cheap 
fix, but it might not be bad. The HTTP scheme needs some work.
BrianH
12-May-2009
[14133]
Carl, while you're here: Post the update blog for May, please! We'd 
like to know what you're up to :)
Pekr
12-May-2009
[14134x2]
BrianH: already requested earlier today on R3 Chat :-)
BrianH: maybe Carl here is visiting using new R3 based Altme GUI 
client? :-)
BrianH
12-May-2009
[14136]
I'm seconding your request :)
Carl
12-May-2009
[14137]
Will do.
Maarten
12-May-2009
[14138x2]
I recently skimmed over a *new* implementation of multiprocessing 
in Python 2.6 and 3.0. Really new. Great model - it could be how 
tasks work in R3
http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html
Sunanda
13-May-2009
[14140]
Henrik:<I can only emphasize the importance of submitting Curecode 
reports.>


If you look at some very recent bug reports (numbers 700 -- 799), 
over half of them have been resolved, often within days
    46 built and/or tested (ie fixed) 
     8 dismissed (not actual bugs)

There seems no better time to report R3 problems than now!


The rest are Reviewed, Deferred or Waiting.....So still on the action 
list.
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14141]
what happened with ordinal accessors in R3, what replaces them?
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14142]
There seems to be bunch of fixes for A54 coming. I really like the 
progress of last few months. While there is still lot's of work, 
some areas are getting fixed and being really usable ....
Sunanda
14-May-2009
[14143]
ordinal accessors still exist in R3:
    fifth [1 2 3 4 5]
    == 5

(There's a discussion in Core about them no longer working with money!. 
But that's the only case I know)
Henrik
14-May-2009
[14144]
wow, 23 fixes so far for A54, including some of my old image bugs.
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14145x2]
Ordinals still exist, but are no longer used as reflective accessors. 
Try HELP "-of".
Most of those are replacements for FIRST, SECOND or THIRD for objects, 
fuunctions and such.
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14147]
thnx brian
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14148x3]
Geez, who is Meijeru ?
That guys post tickets related to bugs on ports which are not.
And Carl seems trust him, My...
People who are not member here, should not be allowed to post tickets.

Because when they have wrong understanding, we can't change their 
mind easly
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14151]
I was exacty wondering the same. IMO there shoud be Carl, and few 
other moderators, as BrianH, Steeve, Ladislav ....
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14152]
There are moderators actually, but i don't understand why they don't 
discard these tickets.
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14153]
new blog posted regarding currency designator ...
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14154x2]
My... who need that know ?

Vectors implementation is not finished, like other things started 
previously.
*now not know
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14156]
what's the url for r3 curecode again?
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14157]
http://curecode.org/rebol3/view-tickets.rsp
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14158]
thx
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14159]
I hate money datatype - the most useless datatype ever. Pity something 
like BCD is represented by such stupid name - money!
Rebolek
14-May-2009
[14160]
no one foces you to use it
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14161]
there there pekr... dont start down that negativity path... we all 
like the new and happy pekr   ;-)
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14162x3]
I want separate BCD! type.
or float! vs decimal!
having money descriptor is of no value for general math. It does 
not do any conversions either, so there is imo very little value 
in money! (datatype :-) - just a cosmetic visual representation
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14165]
yes... decimal! should be BCD and we should have a new float! type 
which equates to current decimal


if no current R2 is going to be compatible anyways... I think this 
is a good time to fix this issue once and for all... its always been 
an issue, since core 1
Geomol
14-May-2009
[14166]
Maybe if you develop banking or other financial applications, money 
datatype could be very nice thing!? Some things are not useful for 
all of us, but very useful for a few of us. (I haven't used money 
datatype myself.)