r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Geomol
14-May-2009
[14166]
Maybe if you develop banking or other financial applications, money 
datatype could be very nice thing!? Some things are not useful for 
all of us, but very useful for a few of us. (I haven't used money 
datatype myself.)
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14167x2]
pekr, have you argued with Carl over this?
if the issue is code maintenance, I think its not a good reason not 
to fix this.
Henrik
14-May-2009
[14169]
I haven't used it, since the readability of the currency string is 
not good. However if you drop the datatype, parsing dialects with 
money as numbers would be a little harder.
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14170x2]
money is usefull, just that it doesn't replace a real BCD type.
which decimal! should be IMHO
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14172]
I posted a comment with an idea, but i'm afraid there would be too 
much drawbacks in the core. It's hopeless...
Sunanda
14-May-2009
[14173]
Steeve: <Geez, who is Meijeru ?>

Someone who posts the bugs he finds ..... And gets them attended 
to.
Not someone who thinks bug posting is ineffective :-)
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14174]
oh so mean... i post bugs too
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14175]
Sunanda - let's be sure, that he is not as "useful" as Dr. Bacon 
on wiki - while he reorganised it, he also completly ruined what 
was already avaiable ...
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14176]
Excellent ! 
Sunanada, see the results i got when i post some tickets 
http://curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=793&cursor=20


Instead of correcting the bugs, Carl shoose to discard the features 
i use.
T_T
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14177]
that was a strange reaction on Carl's part, but I think its consistent 
with how R3 is being developped.... do not let incomplete features 
creep in releases.
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14178]
but it will never come back... T_T
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14179x2]
R2 "incompleteness" in one of the major reasons why many initially 
love the language, but after they try to build a "serious" app, they 
discover that some things need to be fixed.
he actually said something much better... "we need to add native 
image manipulation functions"   :-)
Sunanda
14-May-2009
[14181]
I've also seen useful bits of R2 (in my opinion) be discarded as 
part of the R3 vision.
These things happen :-)
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14182]
for me, R3 is a real attempt at delivering a finished product.  probably 
the first time since rebol's creation.
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14183]
i made a script with R3 which vectorizes simple images (initialyy 
to build vectorial fonts usable with the draw dialect) 

I used a lot bitwise operators like OR and XOR on that images as 
a prefiltering process.
I can put in the te trash my work now.
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14184]
you can talk to carl about the fact that you need them, in r3 chat. 
 I'm there yet but if you explain that you're doing worthwhile stuff, 
he might just  put them back... until the better funcs are put in 
place...
Oldes
14-May-2009
[14185]
Steeve, cannot you just get the RGBA raw data and do the math on 
it instead of image directly? Also is your script available. I have 
own script for making vectorial fonts from bitmap but it works on 
black and white tracing (in rebcode)
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14186]
bah... to be honest, i can do the job using another tricks, it will 
be less elegant...
Henrik
14-May-2009
[14187]
Steeve, Carl knows exactly how to step on your toes, eh? :-)
Oldes
14-May-2009
[14188]
or we will get "few powerful natives to manipulate image data directly".:-)
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14189]
maybe your will be a case to put that higher in priority  ;-)
Oldes
14-May-2009
[14190]
the question is when:-/
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14191x2]
Oldes i used XOR operator on black and white images of letters to 
extract the contours
i can extract the contours with the graphic engine too, but then 
it's polluted with smouth corrections.
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14193x2]
Steeve, did you catch where Carl said that those features would be 
better added as native functions, than as misdefined operators?
Never mind, that was already mentioned :)
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14195]
For my revenge i posted a puzzle
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14196]
Geez, who is Meijeru ?

I like Meijeru, someone who makes bug reports that we can fix or 
dismiss. Even the dismissed tickets serve as documentation. Thanks 
for commenting on some of those, Steeve - you put it better than 
I could. Meijeru reminds me of Steeve, circa 3 months ago :)
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14197]
hehehe
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14198]
BrianH: it is a strange situation - we are giving up on some "polymorphism", 
and replacing it with more functions to get the same reflectivity. 
No more first, second, third, etc. working on multiply types, but 
instead using values-of, words-of, etc.
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14199]
the best testers are always those that don't know what they are doing.
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14200]
I don't understand, why XOR and OR should be removed from functioning 
upon image datatype?
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14201x2]
We got a lot of port! bugs fixed - and tickets usefully documented 
through their dismissal - thanks to Steeve.
Polymorphism only makes sense when the concepts correspond. What 
we are removing is false polymorphism.
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14203]
Brian, Steeve mentioned that not all of vector bugs are fixed, is 
that correct? It would be probably good to fix them, no? :-) (well, 
if vectors have any role in new rebin/plugin/dll interface)
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14204]
To be honest it's not frankly bugs but wishs
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14205]
All of the vector bugs that were reported before the great vector 
rewrite are fixed. The new stuff, not yet.
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14206]
like scalar math operations on vectors
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14207]
There's a bug too, with mold of vectors.
Maxim
14-May-2009
[14208]
are there any matrix operations for vectors?
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14209]
in your dreams Maxim, only in your dreams...
BrianH
14-May-2009
[14210x2]
Not yet. We're waiting to add that until we implement multidimensional 
vectors.
Same with Steeve's scalar math request.
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14212x2]
multivectors? I am curious about its semantics ...
I can't feel there is any intention to add such feature for 3.0 :-)
Steeve
14-May-2009
[14214]
can't or can ?
Pekr
14-May-2009
[14215]
can't. It is not on R3.0 list of features, IIRC.