World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Geomol 14-May-2009 [14166] | Maybe if you develop banking or other financial applications, money datatype could be very nice thing!? Some things are not useful for all of us, but very useful for a few of us. (I haven't used money datatype myself.) |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14167x2] | pekr, have you argued with Carl over this? |
if the issue is code maintenance, I think its not a good reason not to fix this. | |
Henrik 14-May-2009 [14169] | I haven't used it, since the readability of the currency string is not good. However if you drop the datatype, parsing dialects with money as numbers would be a little harder. |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14170x2] | money is usefull, just that it doesn't replace a real BCD type. |
which decimal! should be IMHO | |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14172] | I posted a comment with an idea, but i'm afraid there would be too much drawbacks in the core. It's hopeless... |
Sunanda 14-May-2009 [14173] | Steeve: <Geez, who is Meijeru ?> Someone who posts the bugs he finds ..... And gets them attended to. Not someone who thinks bug posting is ineffective :-) |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14174] | oh so mean... i post bugs too |
Pekr 14-May-2009 [14175] | Sunanda - let's be sure, that he is not as "useful" as Dr. Bacon on wiki - while he reorganised it, he also completly ruined what was already avaiable ... |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14176] | Excellent ! Sunanada, see the results i got when i post some tickets http://curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=793&cursor=20 Instead of correcting the bugs, Carl shoose to discard the features i use. T_T |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14177] | that was a strange reaction on Carl's part, but I think its consistent with how R3 is being developped.... do not let incomplete features creep in releases. |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14178] | but it will never come back... T_T |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14179x2] | R2 "incompleteness" in one of the major reasons why many initially love the language, but after they try to build a "serious" app, they discover that some things need to be fixed. |
he actually said something much better... "we need to add native image manipulation functions" :-) | |
Sunanda 14-May-2009 [14181] | I've also seen useful bits of R2 (in my opinion) be discarded as part of the R3 vision. These things happen :-) |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14182] | for me, R3 is a real attempt at delivering a finished product. probably the first time since rebol's creation. |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14183] | i made a script with R3 which vectorizes simple images (initialyy to build vectorial fonts usable with the draw dialect) I used a lot bitwise operators like OR and XOR on that images as a prefiltering process. I can put in the te trash my work now. |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14184] | you can talk to carl about the fact that you need them, in r3 chat. I'm there yet but if you explain that you're doing worthwhile stuff, he might just put them back... until the better funcs are put in place... |
Oldes 14-May-2009 [14185] | Steeve, cannot you just get the RGBA raw data and do the math on it instead of image directly? Also is your script available. I have own script for making vectorial fonts from bitmap but it works on black and white tracing (in rebcode) |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14186] | bah... to be honest, i can do the job using another tricks, it will be less elegant... |
Henrik 14-May-2009 [14187] | Steeve, Carl knows exactly how to step on your toes, eh? :-) |
Oldes 14-May-2009 [14188] | or we will get "few powerful natives to manipulate image data directly".:-) |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14189] | maybe your will be a case to put that higher in priority ;-) |
Oldes 14-May-2009 [14190] | the question is when:-/ |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14191x2] | Oldes i used XOR operator on black and white images of letters to extract the contours |
i can extract the contours with the graphic engine too, but then it's polluted with smouth corrections. | |
BrianH 14-May-2009 [14193x2] | Steeve, did you catch where Carl said that those features would be better added as native functions, than as misdefined operators? |
Never mind, that was already mentioned :) | |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14195] | For my revenge i posted a puzzle |
BrianH 14-May-2009 [14196] | Geez, who is Meijeru ? I like Meijeru, someone who makes bug reports that we can fix or dismiss. Even the dismissed tickets serve as documentation. Thanks for commenting on some of those, Steeve - you put it better than I could. Meijeru reminds me of Steeve, circa 3 months ago :) |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14197] | hehehe |
Pekr 14-May-2009 [14198] | BrianH: it is a strange situation - we are giving up on some "polymorphism", and replacing it with more functions to get the same reflectivity. No more first, second, third, etc. working on multiply types, but instead using values-of, words-of, etc. |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14199] | the best testers are always those that don't know what they are doing. |
Pekr 14-May-2009 [14200] | I don't understand, why XOR and OR should be removed from functioning upon image datatype? |
BrianH 14-May-2009 [14201x2] | We got a lot of port! bugs fixed - and tickets usefully documented through their dismissal - thanks to Steeve. |
Polymorphism only makes sense when the concepts correspond. What we are removing is false polymorphism. | |
Pekr 14-May-2009 [14203] | Brian, Steeve mentioned that not all of vector bugs are fixed, is that correct? It would be probably good to fix them, no? :-) (well, if vectors have any role in new rebin/plugin/dll interface) |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14204] | To be honest it's not frankly bugs but wishs |
BrianH 14-May-2009 [14205] | All of the vector bugs that were reported before the great vector rewrite are fixed. The new stuff, not yet. |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14206] | like scalar math operations on vectors |
BrianH 14-May-2009 [14207] | There's a bug too, with mold of vectors. |
Maxim 14-May-2009 [14208] | are there any matrix operations for vectors? |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14209] | in your dreams Maxim, only in your dreams... |
BrianH 14-May-2009 [14210x2] | Not yet. We're waiting to add that until we implement multidimensional vectors. |
Same with Steeve's scalar math request. | |
Pekr 14-May-2009 [14212x2] | multivectors? I am curious about its semantics ... |
I can't feel there is any intention to add such feature for 3.0 :-) | |
Steeve 14-May-2009 [14214] | can't or can ? |
Pekr 14-May-2009 [14215] | can't. It is not on R3.0 list of features, IIRC. |
older newer | first last |