World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Pekr 1-Jun-2009 [14778x2] | So - when can we expect first plugin? :-) |
btw - does plugin mean that I have to have the file separate? Or will bundling to one exe be possible? | |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14780x4] | Plugins can be internalized... so yes, a single exe is supported. |
There are a few simple init levels in the host. | |
In fact, it may even be possible to provide your own R boot image. But, maybe that should be special feature... SDK or something. | |
(The boot image is the fundamental r boot code bundled into the exe.... evalutes native, action, and other boot funcs.) | |
Pekr 1-Jun-2009 [14784] | Ah, good to hear ... it once again starts to sound like MagmaOS/Wildman is still a long term plan :-) |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14785] | Regarding plugin timeline: last week. :-( But, so many other "problems" popped up, was not possible to make it. |
Pekr 1-Jun-2009 [14786x2] | well ... but the OS of future is .... JavaScript :-) |
Problems regarding plugin architecture? | |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14788] | No, other things... servers, ISP, DSL, kids, DTV, chicken, wine, etc. |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14789] | Carl, cold you put out the June plan blog a little earlier this time? It would help with prioritization of tickets, something that was skipped recently because we didn't quuite know what was going on... |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14790x3] | Infrastructure. |
Water. | |
Water ** 3. | |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14793] | Wine is infrastructure, yes :) |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14794] | B: yes, ok, earlier. |
Pekr 1-Jun-2009 [14795] | yes, earlier, so that AInc. can properly plan on AmigaOS 6 announcement :-) |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14796] | Well, Pekr, you recognize what is happening, no? |
Pekr 1-Jun-2009 [14797] | Not sure what you mean? Building a future? :-) |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14798x2] | As the world moves to Javascript... they return to the same model they had before, "code is not really data".... and it's like nothing really changed. |
They are going in big circles with only small improvements in their fundamental computing model. | |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14800] | Doc and I decided that the "block" severity would refer to bugs that are stopping development, or the fixing of other bugs. There is only one bug with that severity now: DO/next. The system/user/home replacement is almost there too. |
Pekr 1-Jun-2009 [14801x2] | Carl - but HW enhancements help them to survive and define the "standard" |
What is worse (for us) is, that Silverlight and Flash are taking ahead of View (although Silverlight is not all that easy to code for). The JavaFX (JAVA in general) starts being failure for me (in userland level) | |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14803x2] | B: on block, good. On DO/next... fastest would be a do-next, maybe private (not exported.) Problem is DO is heavily "loaded". |
P: well, really we should not compare ourselves to those.... at least not yet. That makes it easier for us right now. | |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14805] | If you just implement the native portion of DO/next, the intrinsic portion is easy. DO is pretty overloaded though. |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14806x3] | Things come and go. Big systems get bigger... and eventually, they fall over. That is true of all systems... .companies... governments. |
B: let me take a break and see if I can get it to you somehow. Maybe a special A55.1 build for you to try. | |
I have also been working with Ladislav on many math fixes... which he wants to test out. | |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14809] | If you undo the DO string break, that would be worth it too. |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14810] | But, is there a solution to the bug it causes? |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14811] | It is not thhe cause of the bug. Read the ticket again - I found out the real bug and fixed the ticket at least a day before alpha 55. |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14812x2] | Maybe we need DO string! to error out with a message: "old fashioned char-based coding is not allowed." |
Ok, I missed it -- or it was not clear to me. | |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14814x2] | DO of file causes the same bug. |
DO of string not working is a worse buug than CATCH/quit messing up a TRY block. | |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14816x2] | Yes, but there's DO file! and there is DO string! And one is good and healthy, the other nasty and perlish. |
Anyway, will do. | |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14818] | Yes, and both disable TRY because the real problem is CATCH/quit. |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14819] | CATCH/quit is rather special. |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14820] | I was a little surprised that it cased the problem. I thought catch-or-try blocks were nested, their contexts stacked. |
Carl 1-Jun-2009 [14821] | CATCH and TRY are actually quite different mechanisms. The problem is how best to combine them. They both have advantages. |
BrianH 1-Jun-2009 [14822] | The TYPE? THROW or RETURN issue was interesting. I'm not sure how important it is to fix, but it was an interesting insight into how those two functions work in R3. Apparently they don't throw until their return values are evaluated? |
shadwolf 1-Jun-2009 [14823x3] | OMG CAAAAAAAAARL !!! the real CAAAAAAAAARL !!! OOOOOOOOOO MY GOD ^^ |
welcome back in rebol3 world Carl nice to see you here ^^ | |
pekr nope the os futur is rebol 3 :P | |
Ladislav 2-Jun-2009 [14826] | TomC: what is your favourite RANDOM for R3? |
Janko 2-Jun-2009 [14827] | Each time I see someone mention Erlang model I want to post my last "actor-ish" rebol samples I made like 3 weeks ago and still haven't found time to post .. it's nothing special, but it can give a little feeling and future ideas how it would look in rebol |
older newer | first last |