World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Henrik 9-Jun-2009 [15242] | perhaps it would be possible some day to apply specific attributes to a heading. |
Steeve 9-Jun-2009 [15243] | hm.... i don't think so, all the remaining messages are sent after each sync in the CHAT |
Henrik 9-Jun-2009 [15244] | you think it would be too many messages to get in the background? |
Steeve 9-Jun-2009 [15245x6] | i don't think Carl has changed this design drawback |
The chat protocoll doesn't know how to request a specific message from the server, all is loaded in local and the requests are performed in your client memory | |
files are the exceptions, but the tag message for a file (the link) is loaded in your local file, even if you don't download it | |
The R3 chat protocol (as it is now) is not suited for real chatting with a massive exchange of short messages between users or specific channel. Because each time you sync, all is loaded in local. | |
Same drawback as Altme | |
So more there will be traffic and users, more it will be slow and like with Altme, there will be a need to clear the database after a while | |
Henrik 9-Jun-2009 [15251] | twitter is one-way, AFAIK. no chatting. |
Steeve 9-Jun-2009 [15252x3] | Another drawabck, if an existing user launch the chat from another one place (another directory, disk, or computer), the all the database is loaded again in local |
freaking behavior, like altme | |
Yes But i'm afraid that twitter will generate a massive flow of messages after a while. And even if you dont read them, you download them after each sync | |
BrianH 9-Jun-2009 [15255] | Only if they are mirrored to chat, which they currently aren't (thankfully). |
Henrik 9-Jun-2009 [15256] | Massive is relative. A sync of 4500 messages from a scratch takes roughly 10 seconds here. I don't think it poses a big problem. |
Steeve 9-Jun-2009 [15257] | Well it's a problem for my poor connection |
Henrik 9-Jun-2009 [15258] | You do it once. After that, do you expect to receive thousands of messages per sync? |
mhinson 9-Jun-2009 [15259] | Twitter allows for "direct messages" which are not seen by everyone. Twitter can send messages to your mobile at no cost in the UK |
Henrik 9-Jun-2009 [15260] | loading http://twitter.com/rebol3here is a 14 kb webpage for 8 messages, excluding images, so it's probably 20-30 kb each time you want to read it. With the information amount we want, R3 Chat can probably deliver over 200 times more messages in the same bandwidth, assuming that each message is < 140 chars. And also R3 chat only retrieves them once. After that, they're local. Twitter loses. :-) |
BrianH 9-Jun-2009 [15261] | I guess someone needs to make a REBOL client for Twitter. |
Maxim 9-Jun-2009 [15262] | steeve, local caching is not a drawback, its a feature... it prevents the client from having to check all messages EVERY time it starts instead of just once. there should be more parameters though, I agree, giving a time frame would be good, so that it knows to forget old messages you don't care about, for example. |
BrianH 9-Jun-2009 [15263x2] | Better support for background processing would be nice too. |
Not really a problem for R3 chat, but a big problem for AltME. | |
Chris 9-Jun-2009 [15265x3] | ; Shorter Rebol3 Twitter client: |
do http://www.ross-gill.com/r/altxml.r r3tweets: load-xml/dom http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/45953552.rss foreach tweet r3tweets/get-by-tag <item> [ print "" print tweet/get <pubDate> print tweet/get <title> ] | |
That is 'Rebol3 Twitter', not 'Rebol3 client'... | |
Ladislav 10-Jun-2009 [15268] | Hi all. A percent! datatype question. What are your preferences with respect to the full IEEE754 64-bit range? 1) Current state: the whole range is used for percent, except for the fact, that LOAD and MOLD cause error when encountering results such as: 10% + 10% + 10% - 30% (not exactly zero) 2) Use the complete range and correct both LOAD and MOLD to be able to show any value from the range - this means, that the E notation, like 1E-15%, or 1E20% may be needed. 3) Change the %arithmetic limiting it to a subrange of IEEE754 (may be complicated - every operation needs bound checking and slow) |
Pekr 10-Jun-2009 [15269] | What I hated about R2 was EEE format usage, especially when you needed to mold/print into something user-friendly. If R3 has some form/format function, which will handle that, then I don't mind using IEEE notation in console. I am not able to answer 1) - would it make any possible harm to our code, its reflectivity or ability to save/load molded values and getting exactly the same results? |
Ladislav 10-Jun-2009 [15270] | LOAD MOLD - Carl took care of that (seen twitter?) |
Graham 10-Jun-2009 [15271] | heh ... must be total coincidence ... I showed how easy it was to post to twitter from Rebol, and now Carl is tweeting! But oddly, not from Rebol. |
Henrik 10-Jun-2009 [15272] | he is asking for an R3 twitter client though. |
Graham 10-Jun-2009 [15273] | and the problem is ??? |
Henrik 10-Jun-2009 [15274] | is there a problem? He's just sleeping now, so he hasn't received the solutions yet. |
Pekr 10-Jun-2009 [15275x2] | I would prefer GUI version. We should also create priority list - what should happen after the plugins are released? Release first host code, examples? Then what? Move onto parse? Unicode? (still things like collation, sorting not supported)? GUI? |
R3 could be kind of successfull on devices like my 4 days old HTC TouchPro2 :-) There is e.g. special GUI version for YouTube, wrapping the service, hence no need to go via browser. I think that we could wrap some such services, especially the ones having APIs, as Google ones. That would be good showcase for ReBrowser :-) | |
Gregg 10-Jun-2009 [15277] | My percent! preference is the same as for other decimal values: always be correct. :-) In that regard, what are the chances, and ramifications, of percent! using the new bignum internals that money! uses? Please don't make it use scientific (E) notation. |
Maxim 10-Jun-2009 [15278] | scientific notation should be banned ! ;-) |
Geomol 11-Jun-2009 [15279] | And therefore should Planck's constant always be written as: 0.000000000000000000000000000000000662606896 ;-) |
Henrik 11-Jun-2009 [15280] | maybe it makes you respect the number more :-) |
Ladislav 11-Jun-2009 [15281x4] | Please don't make it use scientific (E) notation. - so, what do you want to get from: 10% + 10% + 10% - 30% |
(in the previous version the expression caused a mold error) | |
(exactly since the E notation was banned) | |
aha, you want to use the money! datatype! yes, that is an alternative, but does not ban the E notation anyway | |
Gregg 11-Jun-2009 [15285] | I don't want to ban E notation entirely, but using it should be by choice if at all possible. It's always struck me as odd that anyone would *ever* choose FP, assuming they want correct results. :-) |
Maxim 11-Jun-2009 [15286x2] | its a question of speed... |
display and value are two different things. I understand the need for scientific notation to represent the value, only that there are no easy ways within core to deal and show the result below at a given decimal point without having to convert it to a string and always check the scientific notation in uneeded cases. | |
Claude 11-Jun-2009 [15288x2] | how much time to get a gui in rebol3 linux and other ? |
rebol3 gui for windows is not yet finished !!!! could we have an upgrade of gui demo ? | |
Maxim 11-Jun-2009 [15290] | I wouldn't rely on any kind of Gui expectations for a while in R3. AFAIK, a lot to do still. |
Claude 11-Jun-2009 [15291] | but i read in rebol.com that a gui for rebol chat will be proposed !!! normaly in february 2009 "Resume work on the R3 GUI. The primary focus needs to be on styles for lists and tables." (carryover)." |
older newer | first last |