r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

BrianH
22-Jun-2009
[15684x2]
Ladislav, just checked your SAME? criticisms from the wiki against 
R3, and only the date! transitivity thing still applies.
Struct! is not implemented, nor is denomination in money!. Closed 
ports are not errors and decimals are fixed. Unset and error are 
still not values. The only thing left is the date! zones and the 
type-ignorant any-word comparisons.
Ladislav
22-Jun-2009
[15686]
how about my last comment to r3blog?
BrianH
22-Jun-2009
[15687]
I hadn't noticed the new blog post. Replied there.
Ladislav
22-Jun-2009
[15688]
yet another posted
BrianH
22-Jun-2009
[15689]
SAME? meaning same bits should include the type flags too - otherwise 
same bits is meaningless or cooincidental.
Pekr
23-Jun-2009
[15690x2]
Maxim, now you can defend your copy deep on object issue - http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0212.html
BrainH: btw - Meijeru's identity confirmed - http://users.telenet.be/rwmeijer/
, he now mentions REBOL - http://users.telenet.be/rwmeijer/proglang/
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15692x2]
Cool - we need as much help as we can get. I'm glad he participates 
in the chat too, and his testing has been very helpful.
One more mystery person to go: Peta, are you out there? :)
Oldes
23-Jun-2009
[15694]
It's not another (secret) Pekr's name? :)
Sunanda
23-Jun-2009
[15695]
The bug fixes just keep coming -- Alpha 59 out barely a day after 
A58:

http://www.rebol.net/wiki/R3_Releases#View.exe_2.100.59_23-June-2009


Curecode #961 was fixed in less than 24 hours....That must be a record!
Maarten
23-Jun-2009
[15696x2]
Notice Meijeru's daytime work... must be a fruitful hobby.
I think I ran into him before (may be virtually), I remember him 
as a very kind and nice person.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15698x3]
pekr: well, I did add new posts, but I think everyone MUST participate. 
 this is such a core issue, it can make / break many systems out 
there.
in my case, it breaks every single API I have.
that is unless you consider a 100x (thats 10000%) increase in RAM 
usage and script slowdown acceptable.
Carl
23-Jun-2009
[15701]
http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0213.html- A60 special release.
Sunanda
23-Jun-2009
[15702]
The link in the blog does not work [has /rebol3/ not /r3/ ]

This link does work:
http://www.rebol.com/r3/downloads/r3-a60.exe
Ladislav
23-Jun-2009
[15703]
http://www.rebol.org/art-display-article.r?article=w24v- porting 
INCLUDE to R3
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15704]
brian I would like your comments on the deep object copy issue ( 
http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0212.html)
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15705]
I have been trying to think think it through - there are advantages 
and disadvantages to either way. It is harder to undo a copy than 
not...
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15706]
exactly, which is why I think we should not be bound by one or the 
other .... 

did you see my posts... I provide some alternatives.
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15707]
I'm still thinking. I'll comment after I narrow down this parse bug.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15708x2]
Plus all that binding takes MASSIVE amounts of time for nothing.
(and ram too)
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15710]
Either way you need constructor code. The real question is balance.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15711x2]
IMO we need choice.  this is such a fundamental part of data management 
that we cannot let the compiler decide.


would you code in C if all structure copies behaved this way?  if 
this where the case an OS would probably need 1TB of RAM to run.
allowing COPY on objects makes much more sense to me.
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15713]
I added a fairly comprehensive comment, with tests. I had to generate 
3 CureCode tickets as a result :(
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15714x2]
what is the replacement for first context []  in R3  I can't remember 
the function's name
the why? in R3 is a fabulous idea!
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15716]
WORDS-OF, but the 'self word is not included.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15717]
no self ...   COOL  :-)
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15718]
And the returned words are bound to the object.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15719x2]
oh that is cool.
I see unbind is now part of R3  :-D
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15721]
WORDS-OF works on any-object!, any-function! and map! too, though 
it's only bound to any-object!.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15722]
I could see the binding to map being usefull, it might be impossible 
due to the inner implementation of map
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15723]
I'm trying to backport UNBIND to R2, but it's really tricky.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15724]
I've tried several times... I usually end up doing:     load mold 
myblock
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15725x2]
You can't bind to a map! because the keys are handled differently, 
with the keys going away when assigned none.
You can't bind to something that might go away :)
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15727]
yep  :-)   I guess asking for a word in a map which isn't there returns 
none  ?
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15728x2]
Yup :)
Most of map!'s behavior was my idea.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15730x2]
it makes me think of the array type in AREXX  ;-)
are only words supported in map! or are other types usable for the 
key?
BrianH
23-Jun-2009
[15732]
Other types too, but not all other types.
Maxim
23-Jun-2009
[15733]
so scalars, pairs, tuples, strings, words at least?