r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16917x2]
posted a note about it in R3 chat... just to see his reaction  :-)
a: [x y]
b: 'a
:b: [22 33]
== x: 22
== y: 33
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16919]
probably a flame :)
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16920]
hehe
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16921x3]
Geomol, I wrote MAP-EACH and APPLY functions for R2/Forward - both 
required code generation by the function.
Pekr, your disdain of install and user directories will fail on systems 
that are locked down for corporate or public use - too insecure.
Steeve, Maxim, you guys are hilarious :)
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16924]
not deliberate
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16925x2]
The compliment stands :)
A path is not a string in memory, btw. It's more like a block.
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16927]
well, i only said that without knowing the true truth, only to gain 
a victory against Maxim
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16928]
HAHAHA
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16929]
The string parsing is done at LOAD time. Keep fighting :)
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16930]
spoken like a true french would...

if you can't beat him... lie!    ;-p
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16931]
Usually it works
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16932]
(for the record... I'm french speaking too :-)
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16933]
So you would know :)
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16934]
(ithough,  was right on the specific evaluation scheme)
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16935]
americans exaggerate, we just invent stuff... its more fun... hehehe 
 but we all lie  !  ;-D
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16936]
Yeah, it's still parsed, but it's block-parsed instead of string-parsed.
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16937]
so it's a mid-lie
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16938]
half a truth is no truth AT ALL !!!!
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16939]
I prefer to think that I deduce and induce, rather than lie :)
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16940x2]
assuming is just lying with a good case!
;-)
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16942]
As long as you track (and preferably state) your assumptions, it's 
not even lying at all.
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16943]
right... that's just boring .... hahaha
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16944]
it was just imprecision.
I too simplified to be sure that Maxim got it
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16945]
All right, you foreigners, tell me what you think of http://curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=1212
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16946]
i never use ALIAS
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16947x2]
(just being silly about the foreigners stuff, but the ticket is serious)
Where's Jerry when you need him?
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16949]
In a decade of REBOLing, Ive tried to use it exactly twice, and ended 
up having problems, so I created global words instead and forgot 
about it.
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16950]
Guys, what are you coding with R3 currently ?
BrianH
21-Aug-2009
[16951x2]
I've been mostly writing R3 itself. The projects I want to work on 
require capabilities that R2 don't have, and R3 didn't - until recently.
I've been trying to get R3 in shape to use for my projects, and it's 
been paying off recently (extensions, command!).
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16953]
Actually, there is too much evolutions, i can't focus on a specific 
project
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16954x2]
Haven't used R3 for anything serious yet.


but now that extensions are upon us, the OpenGL integration will 
allow me to use R3 for a *VERY* serious project.  still need Carl 
to fix the make/copy issue before I can convert most of my cool stuff 
over to R3 (like liquid and globs).

I hope extensions will be in the linux and mac ports shortly.
R2 still pays the bills and works very well for me.
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16956]
OpenGL integration is a too big project for me, i lost my motivation 
after some days
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16957]
Its working on my system  :-)


when A80 is out, depending on what he will have added to the API, 
I will try to port a simple OpenGL game to REBOL  :-)
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16958]
well, i have some fun coding a proxy for R3 since some days, but 
I reach my limit attention
Maxim
21-Aug-2009
[16959]
porting relavance to REBOL is also another big project of mine, probably 
will start in under a month  :-)
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16960]
another one RDBMS
Kaj
21-Aug-2009
[16961]
It's not Relational, is it?
Steeve
21-Aug-2009
[16962x4]
ADBMS, sorry
Assoiative, relational... 

To my mind, there is no difference, it's just the query language 
which is different
*associative
At the end is always the same problem.
To have fast indexation algorithms
Henrik
21-Aug-2009
[16966]
I don't code R3 things yet. Too many moving targets.