World: r3wp

and vid ??

our killer app lays initially in plugin, and showing world few presentation, 
easy of gui creation, and some real service wrapping, doing a tour 
comparind sources. Wrap OSnews.com, when you post article there. 
Wrap gmail, or later on their Wave, and show the code difference, 
compare sizes, compare speed. And at the end of presentation do a 
bundle - show stand-alone app called gmail, not needing browser ...

I remember how we once tried to do similar stuff, just for the excercise 
purposes, wrapping SlashDot. There were 2-3 versions of GUI wrappers 
available.

I can show you my HTC mobile Youtube wrapper. An end up, much better 
organisation of space on cell phone, than going to browser.

And you constantly forget one thing - ppl are caught by eye candy, 
you can't fight it. Do the design right, and you might attract ppl 
more easily then you think.

I asked you for a candidate vid application ...

I don't understand, what is the fear about - noone is distracting 
Carl from Core work, by View/VID requests. Carl will be back to gui, 
once he feels Core is stable ...

And I just answered you above - can you read?

For me VID2 does not exist anymore ...

I mean existing ...

VID is now 8 years old now??

I talk about where to get in the future, why to look in the past? 
Because if you want to look into past, you might as well name all 
past RT's mistakes. And I say - why? R3 is the new start. It is REBOL 
which should have been here from the very beginning ...

... and? who cares ...

It was not pushed thru the right marketing channels ...

1) it was one of the first RIAs back in the time, where world did 
not even know, what the RIA is - typical Amiga syndrome - concept, 
which was not embraced back at that time 2) then it slept for way 
too long, allowing Runtime Revolution, Curl, Adobe Air, Silverlight 
to take the place.

So now is the time to add ourselves to the above family ...

Name me another tiny, streamlined browser plugin platform apart from 
Silverlight and Flash ... I have one for you - VID3.

Simply put -let ppl choose, where they want to go. Even today, request/question 
about browser plugin appeared on ML. Some ppl are interested, and 
that is important ....

I thought it was you who asked the question :)

Remember - somewhere in April GUI development was postponed. One 
of the reasons being me asking Carl to listen to the majority, which 
here requested Core work being done first.

No, it was Tim Johnson, he incorrectly understood, what Extensions 
mean, even if they were renemed from plugins to extensions, to avoid 
exactly such kind of confusion :-)

I was quite keen on the plugin .. I wrote a chat client, and a fax 
editor to run under the plugin.

but it was just one more unfinished product.

I think that in the end, browser-plugin will be opensourced. It is 
just small dll wrapper around NS plugin api (for all browsers except 
the MS ;-). I just remember, that we requested the ability to have 
multiple instances in one page, proper installation/update mechanism, 
and mainly - security. I still can't imagine, how it can be done 
in R3. BrianH surely keep an eye on security aspects, e.g. I doubt 
plugin will allow REBOL extensions, which might not be liked by ppl 
like Max :-)

Plug-in is our connection to the browser world. It makes ppl feel 
there is zero deployment needed, althought there is now certain propaganda 
going, which tries to dismiss even plugins ...

it should be the primary delivery mechanism

Max - in R3 Chat you requested user types and set/get function accessors. 
I am not good in internals, but aren't such set/get functions the 
same as 'action types?

Alright, new task: I have a linode server for various purposes. One 
more will now be to offer REBOL 3 in a webshell, similar to this 
one:

http://tryruby.sophrinix.com/


I'm going to need some help with that and I hope it won't collide 
with the Cheyenne already running there.

Yes ... but we have some work to do here too. What about right mouse 
menu? Silverlight has there one item only - Silverligh. Flash has 
its own menu. Do we go similar route? E.g. JAVA install icon into 
Control Panel section. There has to be place, where you configure 
your plugin itself ...

tinkerbell?

I tried the date/time cgi on Apache under Windows - 500 internal 
server error.

Peter - have you checked, that e.g. R2 works? I mean - that generally 
CGI is working for you? Just asking :-)

Henrik - what is your request specifically about?

Yes, I did Pekr. The same script runs using R2.5.6 under Apache on 
Windows

Henrik, have you purchased a Linode server for your stuff now?

Graham, yes, have had one for a few months.

$20/month?

Pekr, well, we have to figure out to extend the R3 console to javascript 
and basically do a console in a browser. It could be a big job.

Graham, yes.

I think Frank did a Rebol in Java which was accessible in a browser 
.. or something

I think that defeats the purpose, by using Java.

Haha, now I know where your request comes from. Carl joking around 
Ruby console :-) http://www.rebol.com/article/0427.html

Henrik, I think that Pekr is thinking of a browser alternative rather 
than a one to one replacement. 


Perhaps it would be difficult to use an extension to embed one of 
Mozilla's monkeys in R3.

Freebell .. that's what it was called.

PeterWood - I am not thinking at all - I just throw wild ideas here 
and there :-)

Some requirements:


1. It would have to be a real console, so we can't simply send CGI 
jobs and close REBOL again.
2. There would have to be a way to spawn and kill consoles.

3. REBOL 3 will have to live up to its ability to limit itself memory 
wise. CPU hogging, we can't do much about. My Linode only has 384 
MB RAM right now.

4. The Ruby console can respond to various input and display help 
text related to what you are typing. This can be used to create tutorials.

5. I have a Cheyenne on my Linode. It either has to use it or not 
collide with it, if we don't use it. Can Cheyenne use a special R3 
process?

6. Managing the console output will obviously need to be done with 
AJAX.

7. Syntax highlighting seems a little superfluous right now, so the 
target right now would be a basic console.

8. In case this is too much on my Linode, I'd like to remove the 
console again. Then perhaps it would be better at that point to invest 
in a dedicated Linode server. :-)

rebol doesn't need 384 mb to run

not as one process, but 10-20 users simultaenously? 100 users?

call "rm *"

Well, we don't want access to that. R3 will have to live up to that 
as well. Good one.