World: r3wp

Should we try make DirectXScript? ;-)

Of course it should have nothing to do with DirectX, but be the link 
between iPhone apps and Amiga ... or something.

call it DirectScript  :-)

Can ActiveScripting languages call DirectX? I would think so...

sanskript  in relation to zen ?  :-)

:-)

Dharma

Call it R as in R3...we'll always know what it means....


It worked for C and there was also an E script language on the Amiga

it already exists... its a statistical language

ARR, then. Pirate language.

hahaha  that would really sit in well with MIS... hahaha  


 "looks guys... we've got a process called pirate.exe"... think its 
 a hacker?
response...
No ... he'd be too stupid to use a name like that!
  

;-)

Then name it after a real (and/or legendary) pirate.....drumroll.....Alvilda
http://towim.denmasters.com/rp/alvilda/pirate.htm
(Contorted acronym available later)

Maxim - where do you come up with such info that Carl is open to 
renaming REBOL? I can't see anything like that floating around ... 
the REBOL rename is total nonsense and anyone claiming otherwise 
should take some marketing pills ...

REBOL-SIG altme group... mid-august

doh... I meant 
REBOL-SIG Qtask project

REBOL being written in capital is another nonsense spread by many 
...

If it is true, I might be out from this community. This is really 
totally non-professional aproach. REBOL's problems lay completly 
elsewhere, not  in the name itself. If Carl can't see it, noone can 
help the situation ...

Why do we come up with new names? Just search the blogs. Search R3-alpha 
altme group. Carl always teases community with similar topic, then 
I put some effort into collecting all possible names, post it several 
time to him ... just to see NO SIGLE response or decision ... this 
is really tiresome ...

not saying its a priority Pekr.  REBOL's name is something that has 
plagued it since its inception.  It doesn't look cool, many don't 
even know how to pronounce it, and to top it off, the capital letters 
is total non-sense I agree too.

Carl is aware of the other problems, but that doesn't mean we should 
ignore the marketing situation. Still, I like the name REBOL.

Its Carl which is adamant about it being spelled in uppercase.

No, it was always RT's marketing mistakes, which plagues it from 
the very beginning. The world was open and tried to look at what 
is REBOL about back then ...

If you want to know what happens after the reaname, just ask me - 
completly nothing ...

I would love we write is without caps.  its much less aggressive... 
maybe a big part of the tiresome nature of the name and even its 
association to COBOL and others is just because of that.

Rebol then? I tend to use R2 and R3 in conversation with people who 
know we are talking about Rebol...

CIO which can't read REBOL instead of COBOL is not CIO, but an idiot 
:-) Young ppl,  potentially new users, even hardly know, what the 
COBOL is ...

Of course the name might matter, but I would like us to not think 
it will cure our marketing problems?

I consider it to be a weakness of decisive capability, if your product 
changes name, because you've found something better. What does that 
not tell you about the language, if you change the name?

no one said it will *fix* marketing.  Its just something that feels 
like a splinter once you start using it.

I can only say - give us R3 beta release, full featured, give us 
Host source released after 4 years of promisses. Gives us new website, 
give us GUI, give us web-browser plugin, give us Docs, give us seminars, 
consultancy, PR activity.  And then maybe think of the rename scheme 
...

Rebol is already MUCH better.... look how the connotation to COBOL 
disapears instantly!

probably the most appropriate name would be "bind" but then Carl 
becomes Sauron  ;-)

I think I will not take part in this discussion this time. There 
was already something like 80 posts to naming VID/View or REBOL in 
the past, with no particular result. Unless someone shows me that 
we know what the strategic plan is, I regard it being a pointless 
discussion ...

you take it too seriously... ;-)  and AFAICT  dropping all caps seems 
to be the common ground that always wins... empirically that's probably 
the solution.

rEBOL

http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/r3blog.r?view=0148#comments

If you want something new, try to not think REBOL related at all 
...

I think that VIVID or inVision make for some nicer names. The trouble, 
with all possible names, is particular domains being taken already. 
You can't be easily innovative domain-name wise nowadays. We tried 
some constructed names, e.g. FireSide for browser-plugin (Fire - 
as in firefox, firebird, Side - coming from side), but even some 
such combinations are taken ...

... hence I would stay with REBOL/Rebol - it is imo a good name ...

me too

me three.  :)  I  like this name.

Slow R3 developer's time explained on Twitter - "Grapes harvested, 
winemaking begins again. Cabernet and Merlot fermentation started. 
It marks the years... and stores them in the bottle." .... hopefully 
Carl bring few bottles to DevCon :-)

Does that mean he is back behind the keyboard or not for a few more 
weeks????

dunno ... Carl is less active for more than 2 weeks. Maybe even more 
- Axing alias was typical trick of Carl, to post some less important 
blog and keep us busy :-)

That dirty  bastard...why do we keep him around at all?

We should call Bill Gates to take over the development of REBOL 4, 
no? :-)

yep... it would cost 1 billion, take twice as long as R3 to develop, 
do half of what R1does coded in javascript, and support for COBOL 
modules.


this is a direct reflection of what resulted in Bill implicating 
himself actively in vista's development process  :-)

I don't think Gates talked to programmers about how they should code 
Vista, or you think otherwise? :-)

Somehow there would also be a dog with glasses somewhere in the user 
interface.

it is said he played an "active" role in vista's development.  and 
its rumored that most of the catastrophy behind vista is directly 
related to the high-level decisions he made back and forth on everything. 
 just like it was in the good old days of windows... where every 
version would go back and forth on features, concepts and naming. 
 


obviously he didn't code anything, but decisions passed through his 
desk, and Bill is part of the old "evil" MS school and still thinks 
that way.  windows 7 was a project start from scratch, with a totally 
different mindset, closer to the user's concerns than trying to dominate 
the industry and competition.  it was out much quicker, much better, 
and addresses just about all of what vista did wrong, as most users 
are saying.  its also FASTER than its predecessor (rather than slower). 
 which is really at the opposite spectrum of vista.