World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3222] | and it's good if they link to rebol.dll :) |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3223] | That would be good. But I also agree with your opinion, that if auto-layouter is good enough, it can actually do better job than some designers :-) |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3224] | as you say... they'll stop using ruby if they do ;) |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3225] | Gabriele - they linked already to it! They have bounties for projects and they don't hesitate to call it Rebol/View clone! It took 3rd place. Then I saw, how author was disappointed, linking to AGG, how slow it was :-) |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3226] | nothing like the real thing :) |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3227] | hmm, if View is small GUI toolkit, I wonder if there is a way, how other languages could benefit from that? :-) Tk, GTK, qt, /View :-) |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3228x2] | well... view is mainly compositor built on AGG. i don't think it's interesting for those guys. |
the interesting part is the rebol part - ie vid, the rich text dialect, the draw dialect and so on. | |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3230] | gabriele - does R3 have a multiline comment ability - or is it still single line? |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3231x3] | rebol's mulitline comments are just done with a multiline string |
eg. comment { ... } | |
or just { ... } most of the times. | |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3234] | yeah thats what i normally do but it gets messy with large code blocks that actually use multi-line strings |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3235] | usually { { { } } } works well :) |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3236x2] | lol |
point taken :) | |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3238] | otherwise, just use a editor that can comment many lines with a single keystroke :P |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3239] | was thinking mainly for when we get an IDE and want to do code block folding etc. |
Geomol 2-Jun-2007 [3240] | Good to know, the alpha is out there somewhere! That was needed, a deliver on a previous said date. I'm looking forward to see some of it in the next month or two. |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3241x2] | so, Geomol was a bad guy too :-) |
no, dunno why - wiki imo sucks ... lots of unneeded stuff around ... | |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3243x3] | that depends on who writes them... |
but... | |
you want open documentation... you have to pay the price for openness :) | |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3246] | Gabriele - re docs translation - that needs some organisation too. Imagine View doc. It is a very good doc, right? Now someone want to translate it, and he/she does so. Then someone does some tweaks/additions, changes to it. So - how translators are notified about it, to not actually need to look thru all doc for what changed? |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3247x2] | ah, mediawiki does that. |
you can get notifications for anything. | |
Cyphre 2-Jun-2007 [3249] | Hi guys..just to confirm R3 alpha is real: http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/stuff/r3-alpha-splash.jpg |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3250x2] | Cyphre - cool, but I can see some white spots there .... the engine is buggy - what are the words behind the white color? :-)) |
I would like to know more about "what" actually is a rebol executable now? How does the set-up look like? Is it some kind of rebol.exe loader, which loads rebol.dll? What about View then? Or is it packaged, so that everything is still inside of rebol.exe? | |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3252x2] | it will be packaged. |
currently we have rebhost.exe (which contains agg compositor) linking to rebol.dll | |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3254] | rebhost.exe? Weird name. Hope it will become rebol.exe, once stable and fully released :-) |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3255x2] | ah, name is just because this is the host for the dll :) ie rebol interpreted is an embeddable library... and it's always embedded into some host application |
the public release will just be rebol.exe, without external dll and so on. developers instead can download the dll, and embed it in their app, or customize the default host for their needs and so on. | |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3257] | I just wonder ... dll is just cross platform library, right? And if I understand it correctly, then in that dll there are mainly structs defined, which you have to fill-in, no? IIRC something like that was said in blog regarding getting OS time. So I wonder - is linking dll to your app sufficient to run rebol code? Or you would have to port also platform specific things? |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3258x2] | you need to add platform specific things - that is, the devices. otherwise, the rebol code would not be able to do much (no ports) |
also, the host defines some natives... eg. browse to make an example. but of course show, and same will be for call etc. | |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3260x2] | so, how would you embed rebol into Delphi for e.g.? Or provide a browser plug-in? rebol.dll from R3 is not the same as rebol.dll from R2, right? With R2, it is full-featured rebol, no? |
ok, off now ... Leaving to prepare beamer to watch Czech Rep. vs Wales Euro 2008 match :-) | |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3262] | to embed in browser you provide a browser plugin host. eg activex host for ie. |
Pekr 2-Jun-2007 [3263x2] | yes, so you have to port also the platform specific stuff. How do you that e.g., if you want link-in REBOL into your delphi app, to be able to do e.g. do-rebol("some script here")? |
it will not be enough to just link rebol.dll, no? | |
Gabriele 2-Jun-2007 [3265x2] | if you want to run any rebol script, you have to provide all the devices. but, you have the source of them already :) |
so... did any info leak? :) | |
Steeve 2-Jun-2007 [3267] | http://www.enregistrersous.com/images/2/165729353020070602221359.html |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3268] | perhaps that post was a little too subtle? ... well for me anyway ;-) |
Steeve 2-Jun-2007 [3269] | sorry, mistake |
Graham 2-Jun-2007 [3270] | one was supposed to be blue |
ICarii 2-Jun-2007 [3271] | lol |
older newer | first last |