World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Gabriele 5-Jun-2007 [3396x3] | someone may trust a document signed by me, someone else will need an official document from some state authority. |
trust is generally based on chains | |
i trust you because someone else i already trust trustes you. | |
Pekr 5-Jun-2007 [3399] | in order to be able to verify certificate, you need to verify it against the root certificate of CA. So if RT becomes CA for its developers, it would be better for them to be able to verify, who asks for certificate. E.g. visit devcon in private, for Carl to be sure who you are :-) |
Gabriele 5-Jun-2007 [3400] | basically, since you are running rebol.exe, you are trusting rt already. |
Pekr 5-Jun-2007 [3401] | yes, rebol.exe could do damage in the extent of my OS user priviledges. |
Gabriele 5-Jun-2007 [3402] | so, if rt can identify me (eg in person at devcon like you say) and tell you via certificate that a script is really from me (identification + authentication), you can then trust the script if you trust me |
Pekr 5-Jun-2007 [3403x2] | hmm, host executable is open sourced, right? Who will be officila provider of such exe? |
yes | |
Gabriele 5-Jun-2007 [3405x2] | who's the official provider of linux? :) |
rt will provide an official one | |
Pekr 5-Jun-2007 [3407x3] | but easier for RT to verify you is to accept some certificate, than to travel to devcon :-) |
ah, linux ... so true .... you have to take some risk .... | |
Simply if I find some R3 distro with modified host environment, so better I am sure where it comes from, right? | |
Gabriele 5-Jun-2007 [3410x4] | what i mean is, the tech side of things is in rebol. the non-tech side is a different matter altogether. |
right :) | |
same thing if you find any exe anywhere. | |
if someone sends you rebhost.exe via email... well... i would not run that ;) | |
Pekr 5-Jun-2007 [3414] | that is why I think we should think about signatures (which is just a hash) and certificates in a bigger picture - mainly when we think about SDK apps or browser plug-in apps with lowered security level ... the truth is, it does not need to come with initial release, but should not be forgotten about. |
Gabriele 6-Jun-2007 [3415] | looks like R3 with 1000 animated gobs on 1000x700 window is at least 2x faster than R2 with 1000 animated faces on 1000x700 window. (someone has reported 5x) |
Henrik 6-Jun-2007 [3416] | wow, this will be good :-) |
Pekr 8-Jun-2007 [3417x3] | guys, any other spoiler for us unlucky? :-) |
what about porting Particles demo for e.g.? Or any other clever measurement gui stuff? | |
there was some simple script measuring FPS (refresh rate), it would be curious to see how AGG compositing helped us. | |
Anton 12-Jun-2007 [3420] | I'm gobsmacked ! :) |
Pekr 12-Jun-2007 [3421x3] | what does it mean? :-) |
ah, gob, so some relation to gobs? | |
that probably mean at least one thing - you are part of early testing group. So, now off to private chat and prepare for being investigated :-) | |
Anton 12-Jun-2007 [3424] | http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=gobsmacked |
Pekr 12-Jun-2007 [3425] | So does it mean something like "positively surprised"? :-) |
Anton 12-Jun-2007 [3426] | Yes, in this context, "gob" is someone's mouth, and smacking is raising your hand suddenly to your mouth, as you would do when surprised. |
Maxim 12-Jun-2007 [3427] | funny find anton :-) |
Tomc 12-Jun-2007 [3428] | kibble yer gob -> eat |
DaveC 15-Jun-2007 [3429x2] | Today is the day for the public beat IIRC. How is it going guys? Hope you're not too stressed. Big thanks for your efforts to date. |
beat = beta | |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [3431x4] | it is not :-) |
but we can beat guys, that is for sure. Hey, Gabriele, is new VID prototype already in the works? :-) | |
1.July is the first extended developer's release. 15.July is public beta .... | |
today is 15 June :-) | |
DaveC 15-Jun-2007 [3435] | What's a month between friends? |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [3436x2] | :-) |
yes, it is half a time between the first and second developer's release - so, guys, give us unlucky some spoilers :-) | |
DaveC 15-Jun-2007 [3438] | Yes a nice screenshot of the new VID please. Anything, please..now...I begging you :-) |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [3439] | I better keep my mouth shut up, or I will be excluded even from second release :-)) |
Henrik 15-Jun-2007 [3440] | http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/stuff/r3-alpha-splash.jpg:-P |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [3441] | that is old! :-) |
Rebolek 15-Jun-2007 [3442x2] | OK, I can tell you one big secret. |
The version now says V2.99.1.3.1 instead of V2.90.20.3.1 | |
Henrik 15-Jun-2007 [3444] | nooo! :-) |
Rebolek 15-Jun-2007 [3445] | Satisfied? ;) |
older newer | first last |