r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3572x2]
ah, nice ... I found that Python has very nice block handling too, 
and I found some operations, which were not possible so easily in 
R2.
I hope rebcode is there already? :-) And that it was improved? And 
also that parser got some improvements, which were suggested for 
years? (not by me, but by others :-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3574]
I think the main focus will be to make a good .dll core for now with 
a VID prototype. Getting that right first will make plugins, rif 
and all that easier.
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3575]
wait, view is in the dll core?
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3576x2]
rebcode is in there, but I haven't used it.
I actually don't know :-)
Rebolek
19-Jul-2007
[3578]
no, view is exe afaik
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3579]
:-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3580]
203 bugreports listed here.
Rebolek
19-Jul-2007
[3581]
and rebcode is there same way as unicode
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3582x3]
wait, because unicode in fact is not supposed to be there, at least 
according to blog ...
but rebcode, at least in R2, was factual implementation ....
so if rebcode is there just as a wrapper = datatype to be recognised, 
but you can't actually use it, then it is not there :-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3585]
I tried a lot of the bug reports in RAMBO that crash R2 just for 
fun, and R3 handles them just fine. Of course the code has been rewritten, 
so you can't make a direct comparison, but it looks to me as Carl 
was going through RAMBO in order to avoid making those mistakes, 
or the code quality has just improved for R3.
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3586]
Henrik - it was the same with R1 vs R2 ... R1 was slow, it did not 
contain even networking, and was some 400 KB big. Then came secret 
Contra project, later released as Core 2.0, and including networking, 
it was actually some 150KB in size, much more stable and much more 
faster ...
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3587]
Rewrites are a healthy thing to do. :-)
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3588]
I don't expect R3 core being any faster, but hopefully it will be 
natively extensible, and some strange GC bugs will be gone, or at 
least debuggable ...
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3589x2]
the new trace is much more useful. you can see variable contents 
for example now.
currently the GC outputs every time it GCs, but I don't know if that 
will become a debug functionality as it's just being printed unconditionally 
on the console right now.
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3591]
hmm, it would be nice to have some debug hooks, for folks like you 
to being able to build proper debugger :-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3592]
My biggest fear is when R3 comes out... it will have so many new 
things, areas to cover, projects that will be made possible. It's 
seriously going to require at least 50 people to cover it all, and 
it will take a long time to cover it all and I think R3 will be vastly 
under utilized for the first 1-2 years, possibly longer, if people 
won't join up to fight for the cause.

It's amazing to think that this little nucleus that is R3 will make 
all that possible. I keep thinking that if PHP is a firecracker, 
Python is a handgrenade, Ruby is a box of dynamite, R3 will be a 
nuclear bomb.
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3593]
Then I like bombs :-)
Geomol
19-Jul-2007
[3594]
The champignon shape is so beautiful! ;-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3595]
yes, I always have to wear welding googles, when coding Rebol :-)
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3596x2]
But I understand what you mean. At least I think I do. Simply put 
many things are being put outside the rebol.dll and it is upon community 
to finish them. I just fear that Rebol has so bad reputation for 
its deployment inabilities, that we will not gain new ppl so easy 
...
but Bill Bucks try to help us, spreading the word, and also Syllable 
does a good job for us. Noone says bad word on Rebol on osnews, because 
if gurus from Syllable team decided to use it, then it must be a 
good langauge :-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3598]
Even R2 is not very well utilized yet. Now if Geomol was a full time 
paid developer, he could probably give us a full postscript engine, 
for example.
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3599x2]
I would like View to become new cross platform gui toolkit, as Qt 
is, GTK is, etc., and if ppl would find it easy to use, especially 
to create non-traditional UIs, then actually we will have something 
nice in hadns ... it all depends upon VID completness. I hope it 
reaches at least state of RebGUI ....
well guys, I know how to attract ppl. One article, with one web with 
rebol plug-ins, and few demos. Give me that. Show ppl apps like Deluxe 
Pain clone, and they will like it ....
Geomol
19-Jul-2007
[3601]
have to wear welding googles, when coding Rebol

That could be a good commercial, people with all different kinds 
of heavy protection equipment ... coding in REBOL. :-)
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3602x2]
Henrik - is there some nice demo already? I would eg. would like 
to see particles running on R3. Should not be difficult to port, 
and could show general speed improvement :-) Maybe you could take 
short videos of R2 and R3 versions to compare :-)
... maybe that would be good teasers for those - unlucky :-)
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3604]
Therea are no really interesting demos yet and we're not supposed 
to do benchmarks (even though we do for fun), since some debugging 
code is still present. I think also there is no hardware blitting 
yet in R3 View. R3 DRAW seems to be about as fast as R2 draw for 
now.
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3605]
and will there be one?
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3606]
I don't know when that comes.
Louis
19-Jul-2007
[3607x3]
Excitement is building! I just hope that sufficient emphasis is given 
to documentation. Documentation is almost as important as the product 
itself. If you can't figure out how to use a great product, it does 
you no good. More than anything else, documentation will determine 
whether REBOL three will take off.
Every feature without exception needed to be explained, and actual 
working examples given---scripts that demonstrate that feature in 
a clear and simple way.
needed = needs
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3610]
the new dictionary will have Wiki features and possibly a comments 
section.
Louis
19-Jul-2007
[3611]
That will help, but the docs should be modified by the coders as 
the code is modified and what it does is still fresh in their minds. 
The very scripts they use in testing a feature could become an example.
Kaj
19-Jul-2007
[3612x3]
well guys, I know how to attract ppl. One article, with one web with 
rebol plug-ins, and few demos. Give me that. Show ppl apps like Deluxe 
Pain clone, and they will like it ....
Petr, Syllable doesn't have a Czech translation yet. I would think 
Syllable should be suitable for your country. Wouldn't you like to 
do a translation? Later when we have R3, you could do some joint 
promotion
We're building localized live CDs now, so we could give you a Czech 
live CD with REBOL to promote
Graham
19-Jul-2007
[3615]
Does rugby run under R3?
Pekr
19-Jul-2007
[3616]
Kaj, thanks for the offer. Currently I am pressed for time, finishing 
some strategies in my new job. We can get back to it in few weeks 
....
Kaj
19-Jul-2007
[3617]
OK, let me know
Henrik
19-Jul-2007
[3618]
graham, I strongly doubt it.
Maarten
20-Jul-2007
[3619x2]
Me too
But, R3 has Reb services built in?
Gabriele
20-Jul-2007
[3621]
it will, not yet though. (but, we hope to have it working for release 
or shortly after)