World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3572x2] | ah, nice ... I found that Python has very nice block handling too, and I found some operations, which were not possible so easily in R2. |
I hope rebcode is there already? :-) And that it was improved? And also that parser got some improvements, which were suggested for years? (not by me, but by others :-) | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3574] | I think the main focus will be to make a good .dll core for now with a VID prototype. Getting that right first will make plugins, rif and all that easier. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3575] | wait, view is in the dll core? |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3576x2] | rebcode is in there, but I haven't used it. |
I actually don't know :-) | |
Rebolek 19-Jul-2007 [3578] | no, view is exe afaik |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3579] | :-) |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3580] | 203 bugreports listed here. |
Rebolek 19-Jul-2007 [3581] | and rebcode is there same way as unicode |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3582x3] | wait, because unicode in fact is not supposed to be there, at least according to blog ... |
but rebcode, at least in R2, was factual implementation .... | |
so if rebcode is there just as a wrapper = datatype to be recognised, but you can't actually use it, then it is not there :-) | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3585] | I tried a lot of the bug reports in RAMBO that crash R2 just for fun, and R3 handles them just fine. Of course the code has been rewritten, so you can't make a direct comparison, but it looks to me as Carl was going through RAMBO in order to avoid making those mistakes, or the code quality has just improved for R3. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3586] | Henrik - it was the same with R1 vs R2 ... R1 was slow, it did not contain even networking, and was some 400 KB big. Then came secret Contra project, later released as Core 2.0, and including networking, it was actually some 150KB in size, much more stable and much more faster ... |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3587] | Rewrites are a healthy thing to do. :-) |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3588] | I don't expect R3 core being any faster, but hopefully it will be natively extensible, and some strange GC bugs will be gone, or at least debuggable ... |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3589x2] | the new trace is much more useful. you can see variable contents for example now. |
currently the GC outputs every time it GCs, but I don't know if that will become a debug functionality as it's just being printed unconditionally on the console right now. | |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3591] | hmm, it would be nice to have some debug hooks, for folks like you to being able to build proper debugger :-) |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3592] | My biggest fear is when R3 comes out... it will have so many new things, areas to cover, projects that will be made possible. It's seriously going to require at least 50 people to cover it all, and it will take a long time to cover it all and I think R3 will be vastly under utilized for the first 1-2 years, possibly longer, if people won't join up to fight for the cause. It's amazing to think that this little nucleus that is R3 will make all that possible. I keep thinking that if PHP is a firecracker, Python is a handgrenade, Ruby is a box of dynamite, R3 will be a nuclear bomb. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3593] | Then I like bombs :-) |
Geomol 19-Jul-2007 [3594] | The champignon shape is so beautiful! ;-) |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3595] | yes, I always have to wear welding googles, when coding Rebol :-) |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3596x2] | But I understand what you mean. At least I think I do. Simply put many things are being put outside the rebol.dll and it is upon community to finish them. I just fear that Rebol has so bad reputation for its deployment inabilities, that we will not gain new ppl so easy ... |
but Bill Bucks try to help us, spreading the word, and also Syllable does a good job for us. Noone says bad word on Rebol on osnews, because if gurus from Syllable team decided to use it, then it must be a good langauge :-) | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3598] | Even R2 is not very well utilized yet. Now if Geomol was a full time paid developer, he could probably give us a full postscript engine, for example. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3599x2] | I would like View to become new cross platform gui toolkit, as Qt is, GTK is, etc., and if ppl would find it easy to use, especially to create non-traditional UIs, then actually we will have something nice in hadns ... it all depends upon VID completness. I hope it reaches at least state of RebGUI .... |
well guys, I know how to attract ppl. One article, with one web with rebol plug-ins, and few demos. Give me that. Show ppl apps like Deluxe Pain clone, and they will like it .... | |
Geomol 19-Jul-2007 [3601] | have to wear welding googles, when coding Rebol That could be a good commercial, people with all different kinds of heavy protection equipment ... coding in REBOL. :-) |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3602x2] | Henrik - is there some nice demo already? I would eg. would like to see particles running on R3. Should not be difficult to port, and could show general speed improvement :-) Maybe you could take short videos of R2 and R3 versions to compare :-) |
... maybe that would be good teasers for those - unlucky :-) | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3604] | Therea are no really interesting demos yet and we're not supposed to do benchmarks (even though we do for fun), since some debugging code is still present. I think also there is no hardware blitting yet in R3 View. R3 DRAW seems to be about as fast as R2 draw for now. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3605] | and will there be one? |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3606] | I don't know when that comes. |
Louis 19-Jul-2007 [3607x3] | Excitement is building! I just hope that sufficient emphasis is given to documentation. Documentation is almost as important as the product itself. If you can't figure out how to use a great product, it does you no good. More than anything else, documentation will determine whether REBOL three will take off. |
Every feature without exception needed to be explained, and actual working examples given---scripts that demonstrate that feature in a clear and simple way. | |
needed = needs | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3610] | the new dictionary will have Wiki features and possibly a comments section. |
Louis 19-Jul-2007 [3611] | That will help, but the docs should be modified by the coders as the code is modified and what it does is still fresh in their minds. The very scripts they use in testing a feature could become an example. |
Kaj 19-Jul-2007 [3612x3] | well guys, I know how to attract ppl. One article, with one web with rebol plug-ins, and few demos. Give me that. Show ppl apps like Deluxe Pain clone, and they will like it .... |
Petr, Syllable doesn't have a Czech translation yet. I would think Syllable should be suitable for your country. Wouldn't you like to do a translation? Later when we have R3, you could do some joint promotion | |
We're building localized live CDs now, so we could give you a Czech live CD with REBOL to promote | |
Graham 19-Jul-2007 [3615] | Does rugby run under R3? |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3616] | Kaj, thanks for the offer. Currently I am pressed for time, finishing some strategies in my new job. We can get back to it in few weeks .... |
Kaj 19-Jul-2007 [3617] | OK, let me know |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3618] | graham, I strongly doubt it. |
Maarten 20-Jul-2007 [3619x2] | Me too |
But, R3 has Reb services built in? | |
Gabriele 20-Jul-2007 [3621] | it will, not yet though. (but, we hope to have it working for release or shortly after) |
older newer | first last |