World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3596x2] | But I understand what you mean. At least I think I do. Simply put many things are being put outside the rebol.dll and it is upon community to finish them. I just fear that Rebol has so bad reputation for its deployment inabilities, that we will not gain new ppl so easy ... |
but Bill Bucks try to help us, spreading the word, and also Syllable does a good job for us. Noone says bad word on Rebol on osnews, because if gurus from Syllable team decided to use it, then it must be a good langauge :-) | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3598] | Even R2 is not very well utilized yet. Now if Geomol was a full time paid developer, he could probably give us a full postscript engine, for example. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3599x2] | I would like View to become new cross platform gui toolkit, as Qt is, GTK is, etc., and if ppl would find it easy to use, especially to create non-traditional UIs, then actually we will have something nice in hadns ... it all depends upon VID completness. I hope it reaches at least state of RebGUI .... |
well guys, I know how to attract ppl. One article, with one web with rebol plug-ins, and few demos. Give me that. Show ppl apps like Deluxe Pain clone, and they will like it .... | |
Geomol 19-Jul-2007 [3601] | have to wear welding googles, when coding Rebol That could be a good commercial, people with all different kinds of heavy protection equipment ... coding in REBOL. :-) |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3602x2] | Henrik - is there some nice demo already? I would eg. would like to see particles running on R3. Should not be difficult to port, and could show general speed improvement :-) Maybe you could take short videos of R2 and R3 versions to compare :-) |
... maybe that would be good teasers for those - unlucky :-) | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3604] | Therea are no really interesting demos yet and we're not supposed to do benchmarks (even though we do for fun), since some debugging code is still present. I think also there is no hardware blitting yet in R3 View. R3 DRAW seems to be about as fast as R2 draw for now. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3605] | and will there be one? |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3606] | I don't know when that comes. |
Louis 19-Jul-2007 [3607x3] | Excitement is building! I just hope that sufficient emphasis is given to documentation. Documentation is almost as important as the product itself. If you can't figure out how to use a great product, it does you no good. More than anything else, documentation will determine whether REBOL three will take off. |
Every feature without exception needed to be explained, and actual working examples given---scripts that demonstrate that feature in a clear and simple way. | |
needed = needs | |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3610] | the new dictionary will have Wiki features and possibly a comments section. |
Louis 19-Jul-2007 [3611] | That will help, but the docs should be modified by the coders as the code is modified and what it does is still fresh in their minds. The very scripts they use in testing a feature could become an example. |
Kaj 19-Jul-2007 [3612x3] | well guys, I know how to attract ppl. One article, with one web with rebol plug-ins, and few demos. Give me that. Show ppl apps like Deluxe Pain clone, and they will like it .... |
Petr, Syllable doesn't have a Czech translation yet. I would think Syllable should be suitable for your country. Wouldn't you like to do a translation? Later when we have R3, you could do some joint promotion | |
We're building localized live CDs now, so we could give you a Czech live CD with REBOL to promote | |
Graham 19-Jul-2007 [3615] | Does rugby run under R3? |
Pekr 19-Jul-2007 [3616] | Kaj, thanks for the offer. Currently I am pressed for time, finishing some strategies in my new job. We can get back to it in few weeks .... |
Kaj 19-Jul-2007 [3617] | OK, let me know |
Henrik 19-Jul-2007 [3618] | graham, I strongly doubt it. |
Maarten 20-Jul-2007 [3619x2] | Me too |
But, R3 has Reb services built in? | |
Gabriele 20-Jul-2007 [3621] | it will, not yet though. (but, we hope to have it working for release or shortly after) |
Geomol 24-Jul-2007 [3622] | Would it be a good idea, if functions like ADD could take second argument as a block, so it could add up many values? Example: >> add 1 [2 3 4 5] == 15 It's the same kind of functionality as JOIN, which can take second argument as a block to join many values. |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3623x2] | there is a method to do that in R3 already. :-) |
ah, wait, I'm wrong. I thought you meant, adding 1 to each specific number in the b lock. | |
Geomol 24-Jul-2007 [3625x2] | I see! My example were maybe not the best, because I'm not thinking of INC. Another example: >> x: 4 >> add x [1 2 3 5] == 15 |
Thinking a little further, what if I want to add all the values in a block. With my suggested ADD function, I could do: >> blk: [1 2 3 4 5] >> add blk/1 next blk == 15 But that's clumsy. With JOIN, we also have REJOIN. So if we have this new version of ADD, should we also have a READD? (Bad name!) Example: >> blk: [1 2 3 4 5] >> readd blk == 15 | |
Pekr 24-Jul-2007 [3627] | So, one week to official R3 release? Should we start count-down? :-) |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3628] | I... don't know if I would do that :-) |
Pekr 24-Jul-2007 [3629x3] | you mean we should not bet on that date? :-) |
But sooner or later it has to come out, no? :-) | |
Well, I am willing to wait, but not endlessly, let's say 7.9. is fine with me, I am 35 :-) | |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3632x2] | I don't think it's realistic. |
some people are very quiet right now, so I guess they are working intensely on stuff for the next alpha. | |
Pekr 24-Jul-2007 [3634] | why would Gabriele mention that date here? After all - it will be public alpha, not beta, no? |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3635] | I don't know why it was mentioned. I would personally not mention any dates until we are fairly sure that there is about 1 week of work left. |
Pekr 24-Jul-2007 [3636] | well, it all depends when you want to release. I think that for R3 to be feature complete, and I mean all those plug-ins, rif, rebin, unicode, it will take another year to be there .... |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3637] | mentioning dates only makes me feel bad that we could not make it to that date. :-) |
Geomol 24-Jul-2007 [3638] | Pekr, the "couple of weeks delay" was for the beta, according to Carl's blog. |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3639] | yes, there'll be a ton of work after the beta release. I hope that people will come together in the right groups to extend R3 to its full capacity. |
Pekr 24-Jul-2007 [3640] | the most difficult part will to attract new developers, being able to extend native (C level) code base ... |
Geomol 24-Jul-2007 [3641x2] | I think, we should read it as: at of 6-Jul-2007, the beta was delayed a couple of weeks. I have a feeling, there is being hard work going on, but it could be delayed yet more. We'll have to wait and see. |
Personally I like the things in there to be robust better than having tons of features. | |
Henrik 24-Jul-2007 [3643] | Geomol, yes, people are working very hard. I wouldn't consider the delays as anything to worry about if the dates were not published. There are no setbacks or things that have failed or strong disagreements or detours into "ohh, shiny!" land. :-) It just needs to take the time it needs to be finished. |
Pekr 24-Jul-2007 [3644] | I don't mind about dealys either, as much as R3 is as cool as I think it is going to be ... |
Geomol 24-Jul-2007 [3645] | Maybe we should send a message to Carl, that he'll receive a present, when R3 is out? As a carrot! ;-) |
older newer | first last |