World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Graham 4-Oct-2007 [4554] | Carl ..or whoever is advising him, underestimates us |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4555x2] | Yeah. I understand all the arguments given. The problem is, when you open yourself for feedback, you get a lot of idiots, if I may say so. But this obscures the fact that the silent majority are reasonable humans |
For our download numbers, I'm also amazed at how little feedback we actually get, even about things that we know are broken. Often, we try to push people to report stuff we don't know yet, but they assume that they shouldn't speak up about a non-finished release | |
Mchean 4-Oct-2007 [4557] | such a depressing conversation |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4558] | It is |
Graham 4-Oct-2007 [4559] | Well, I've posted my view point as expressed here on Rebolweek blog. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4560] | Very balanced summary; thanks for that |
Oldes 4-Oct-2007 [4561] | Kaj, if you just want to create simple forms, I don't know, why you cannot use R2. I'm still developing for R2 and don't have any problem if the R3 will come a few months later. And I think, you can simply ask Gabriele to get access to R3-alpha world and help if you can. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4562] | R2 is a monolithic, closed product that doesn't integrate on a platform level. I need the R3 libraries, even if it does a lot less than R2 |
Oldes 4-Oct-2007 [4563] | Then ask Gabriele and you can help with Linux porting. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4564x2] | This is the most important strategic innovation of R3, and it's long overdue |
I did. It doesn't seem to be time yet, so the matter comes back to planning | |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4566] | Kaj - you should know that I strongly disagree with Henrik's aproach. Although I have total trust to his developer's skills, I would probably fire him as a marketing responsible person :-) |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4567] | that is because Pekr doesn't develop software from the bottom up... :-) |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4568x2] | And you should also know, that for few days, I am creating strong push to take different strategy. I already proposed it to Carl, talked privately with him. Gregg seems to agree with me too. I suggested to create CONCRETE release strategy and product feature freezing plan. I think, that psychologically, userbase will accept e.g. Christmas time with R3/Core like release = nearly R2/Core compatible product, no modules, no tasks, no unicode, but ppl could bet it would come. From that point, we could continue ... |
Yes, Henrik, I am mostly top-down guy, who mostly talks, not doing any development at all :-) | |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4570] | I think basically that's why we disagree. Really. :-) |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4571] | Hey, I always see myself alternating between phases of top-down and bottom-up planning. I guess neither of you can follow me. :-) You have my support, Petr |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4572x2] | this debate convinces me even more of my position :-) |
and why developers and salesmen do not get along well | |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4574] | See, you don't see the other side |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4575] | I don't want RT becoming another Amiga Inc. And I will not move my opinion position a milimetter. Maybe I even started to being new marketing guy for RT! For me it is like the last call. If things don't work out, I don't trust RT, REBOL, whatever related anymore. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4576] | Exactly my feeling. It's eary |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4577] | I do see the other side. The other side caused me quite a lot of trouble on some projects. I'm not going to talk about it, but suffice it to say, it had to do with prematurely released deadlines. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4578x3] | I've been there. But the other side has the same (or reverse) problems with us |
These are tech people responding to failed promises: | |
http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=18714 | |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4581] | Last time I strictly expressed my opinion on RT's not sufficient communication skills, it nearly felt as I ordered Carl to update his blog. Reichart jumped in with disagreement, only stating the group is doing good progress, and then he left this group. But once again - I will not move a millimeter! |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4582] | Kaj, it's ugly with A. Inc. I'm not even sure that real tech people are involved. They have ridiculed themselves beyond comprehension. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4583] | That's exactly the road that RT is on |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4584] | almost as much as SCO. |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4585] | If RT will listen to what I say, I can lead them thru :-) |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4586] | Don't be fooled because the few of us here are the last people remaining |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4587] | remaining? were there ever more people? |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4588x3] | I have strong faith in what I say and usually I am right, even if sometimes my suggestions might sound as too strict. |
but there is even less ppl. And I can also notice the interest is withering. | |
Where are ppl like - Steve Shireman, Doc, Cyphre, Gabriele, Ladislav? Working privately, even for REBOL related business, but they are not here. Well, Gabriele is here often, others are not. Volker, Anton? | |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4591x2] | I would let it wither. I think people will return, once R3 comes out. |
if a company produces something interesting, people will come, even if they've left it before. that's my theory. | |
Pekr 4-Oct-2007 [4593] | I would like to believe it. I really hope it is just like ppl are doing other things, and once R3 is released, they suddenly come up from various holes and that REBOL will once again become vital point of interest ... but I am scared that the momentum is vanishing ... |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4594x2] | Amiga Inc. generated quite a lot of interest before the first release of AmigaAnywhere, because of the Tao Group technology. The technology was interesting, but it was an "R2"; closed and hard to develop for, sparse documentation, etc. but impressive to look at. Today they have squandered their opportunity window, because their technology was really depending on such a window. But if they produce something new, something incredible, of course I'd be interested, and so will many other people. |
it's the same thing with REBOL. "oh, I liked the language a lot, but I couldn't do XYZ." well, if you can do XYZ now, maybe you'll be interested again. I think most people who have left REBOL saw it as something with great potential and great fun to use. They won't forget that. It'll be easy to regain momentum with these people. | |
btiffin 4-Oct-2007 [4596] | Henrik; I have to disagree again. I had a friend that saved up for years to buy a really nice BMW motorcycle. He was so excited. Then come delivery day he was told he had to wait. For two months he was told "maybe tomorrow". Then when it was delivered and I helped him load it on my truck, I could see in his eyes that he just didn't care anymore. He road that bike like it was something to be tolerated, not enjoyed. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4597] | Amiga Inc. will never do such a thing any more. I'm not exactly sure what its current purpose is, but it has one and it's not technology development |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4598] | Motorcycles are not software. |
btiffin 4-Oct-2007 [4599] | It was the disappointment of "maybe tomorrow" for too many days. It just sucked all the joy out of the experience for him...something that he never got back. |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4600] | People come back in droves all the time. Look at Apple how they lost themselves in the 90's and now are back again, more popular than ever. A Danish IT company here was widely criticized for extremely poor customer support and lost a lot of customers. They turned around and people came back. Look at Linux. Maybe you won't install Ubuntu as your main desktop this time around, but maybe in a year. It's lurking in the background and you'll make the jump to it when you want to. |
Kaj 4-Oct-2007 [4601x2] | I'm not sure if the REBOL community has contracted, but I suspect so. When I joined five years ago, there was a lot of activity, but it has mostly gone downhill since then |
There' s no publicity any more, no books for example. And it's a different world now: open source languages have taken over | |
Henrik 4-Oct-2007 [4603] | it doesn't matter in the long run. |
older newer | first last |