r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4934]
If rebol is going to be a dll .. won't that help there?
Pekr
11-Oct-2007
[4935x7]
Other integration is web technologies - there are here to stay .... 
I don't think we will be successfull in creating html, css output 
it rebol. Do we want to write web-browser in rebol? OTOH, even Python, 
using e.g. VxWidgets, has rather simple html support widget, not 
full browser support. So, DaveC, what kind of html integration in 
Python are you talking about?
And if we need full html support, well then, I suggest khtml webkit, 
as Mozilla is known of being difficult to wrap (unless situation 
changed from two years ago. They are supposed to have minimo or something 
like that for mobile devices)
rebol as .dll or even static lib will help much. You will be able 
to integrate e.g. to Delphi, call rebol from your other app. But 
- does JAVA use dlls? Does net use dlls? I don't know, but I doubt.
Having REBOL in JAVA would get rebol onto most mobile devices and 
nearly everywhere. OTOH - JAVA on mobile devices is restricted, not 
consistent across the platforms - just ask Cyphre for his experience. 
So, maybe, and I repeat - maybe - it will be easier to port REBOL 
to most platforms, rather than to do REBOL-in-JAVA project.
Other thing is - how you get REBOL onto cell phone? There is JAVA 
there. You are not allowed to upload other kind of apps.
Here's an example of integration - http://www.codeplex.com/Wiki/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPython
- you simply get whole .Net infrastructure available to Python.
But we have to decide on priorities. As for me, I prefer finished 
R3 with plug-ins, and then web browser plugin. I think we can break-thru 
with REBOL itself. Those kind of integrations can come later.
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4942x3]
My main interest is in building stand alone applications so I have 
less requirement for .net and java
Is use by fortune 500 companies important?   Is this needed to validate 
Rebol's existence?
I suspect not .. if the language is cool enough, hackers will use 
it .. and it will then eventually find its way there
Ashley
11-Oct-2007
[4945]
I think REBOL should work with COBOL, and should be ported to mainframes 
;)
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4946x3]
Of course it depends on how RT plan to derive their income
Is it from consulting with R3?  Or from building applications in 
R3??
frankly the sdk should be free
PeterWood
11-Oct-2007
[4949]
The Java Native Interface can be used for calling native code libraries
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4950]
putting barriers to use in an already very small developer base is 
counter productive
Pekr
11-Oct-2007
[4951]
I hope R3 has no barriers ...
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4952x5]
I mean after one buys a couple of sdks and /pro versions .. there's 
no real need to purchase any more.
It's a dead end as a source of revenue unless you have lots of new 
users
the first encap licensing scheme was very unusual
Pekr, tell us more about R3
will we be able to build networked games with 1000s of concurrent 
users ?  :)
Pekr
11-Oct-2007
[4957x2]
Dunno :-) But - why not. Surely View is not the right engine to create 
games ;-)
I mean - supporting infrastructure - networking - why not ...
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4959x2]
Gabriele wasn't able to get chord working
in R2
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4961]
shouldn't be a problem in R3.
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4962x3]
what about memory management?
is it better?  I used to get out of memory errors in encapped apps 
if I waited long enough ... days to weeks
Support for 64 bit windows?
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4965]
can't tell yet. no tests that big have been run yet. there are a 
few recycle bugs that are being fixed.
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4966x2]
my Cerebrus antispam program would eventually die from lack of memory 
... after some weeks of running
I would like to resurrect it if I can .. if memory management has 
improved.
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4968x2]
the decompress function has a memory limit option. it's been discussed 
whether it should be removed or not, but such things will be necessary 
in an embedded environment.
overall R3 uses less memory than R2
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4970]
do you know why?
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4971]
More optimized datatypes, tighter code and GOBs.
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4972]
and if you're running a non-gui app .. any difference?
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4973]
I just started an R3 console. Everytime R3 starts, it displays a 
splashscreen with rich text, a picture and two buttons in it. When 
I close it, stats returns 1276368 bytes.
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4974x2]
got a screenshot ?
of the rich text?
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4976x2]
contains secret info, can't show it. :-)
I think there is a blurred one somewhere...
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4978x2]
geez ...
secrets ...
Henrik
11-Oct-2007
[4980x3]
http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/stuff/r3-alpha-splash.jpg<-- it's pretty 
old. the new one contains clickable links.
doing something in R2 would probably require 5-6 MB memory.
something like that
Graham
11-Oct-2007
[4983]
where's the rich text?