World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4934] | If rebol is going to be a dll .. won't that help there? |
Pekr 11-Oct-2007 [4935x7] | Other integration is web technologies - there are here to stay .... I don't think we will be successfull in creating html, css output it rebol. Do we want to write web-browser in rebol? OTOH, even Python, using e.g. VxWidgets, has rather simple html support widget, not full browser support. So, DaveC, what kind of html integration in Python are you talking about? |
And if we need full html support, well then, I suggest khtml webkit, as Mozilla is known of being difficult to wrap (unless situation changed from two years ago. They are supposed to have minimo or something like that for mobile devices) | |
rebol as .dll or even static lib will help much. You will be able to integrate e.g. to Delphi, call rebol from your other app. But - does JAVA use dlls? Does net use dlls? I don't know, but I doubt. | |
Having REBOL in JAVA would get rebol onto most mobile devices and nearly everywhere. OTOH - JAVA on mobile devices is restricted, not consistent across the platforms - just ask Cyphre for his experience. So, maybe, and I repeat - maybe - it will be easier to port REBOL to most platforms, rather than to do REBOL-in-JAVA project. | |
Other thing is - how you get REBOL onto cell phone? There is JAVA there. You are not allowed to upload other kind of apps. | |
Here's an example of integration - http://www.codeplex.com/Wiki/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPython - you simply get whole .Net infrastructure available to Python. | |
But we have to decide on priorities. As for me, I prefer finished R3 with plug-ins, and then web browser plugin. I think we can break-thru with REBOL itself. Those kind of integrations can come later. | |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4942x3] | My main interest is in building stand alone applications so I have less requirement for .net and java |
Is use by fortune 500 companies important? Is this needed to validate Rebol's existence? | |
I suspect not .. if the language is cool enough, hackers will use it .. and it will then eventually find its way there | |
Ashley 11-Oct-2007 [4945] | I think REBOL should work with COBOL, and should be ported to mainframes ;) |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4946x3] | Of course it depends on how RT plan to derive their income |
Is it from consulting with R3? Or from building applications in R3?? | |
frankly the sdk should be free | |
PeterWood 11-Oct-2007 [4949] | The Java Native Interface can be used for calling native code libraries |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4950] | putting barriers to use in an already very small developer base is counter productive |
Pekr 11-Oct-2007 [4951] | I hope R3 has no barriers ... |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4952x5] | I mean after one buys a couple of sdks and /pro versions .. there's no real need to purchase any more. |
It's a dead end as a source of revenue unless you have lots of new users | |
the first encap licensing scheme was very unusual | |
Pekr, tell us more about R3 | |
will we be able to build networked games with 1000s of concurrent users ? :) | |
Pekr 11-Oct-2007 [4957x2] | Dunno :-) But - why not. Surely View is not the right engine to create games ;-) |
I mean - supporting infrastructure - networking - why not ... | |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4959x2] | Gabriele wasn't able to get chord working |
in R2 | |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4961] | shouldn't be a problem in R3. |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4962x3] | what about memory management? |
is it better? I used to get out of memory errors in encapped apps if I waited long enough ... days to weeks | |
Support for 64 bit windows? | |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4965] | can't tell yet. no tests that big have been run yet. there are a few recycle bugs that are being fixed. |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4966x2] | my Cerebrus antispam program would eventually die from lack of memory ... after some weeks of running |
I would like to resurrect it if I can .. if memory management has improved. | |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4968x2] | the decompress function has a memory limit option. it's been discussed whether it should be removed or not, but such things will be necessary in an embedded environment. |
overall R3 uses less memory than R2 | |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4970] | do you know why? |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4971] | More optimized datatypes, tighter code and GOBs. |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4972] | and if you're running a non-gui app .. any difference? |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4973] | I just started an R3 console. Everytime R3 starts, it displays a splashscreen with rich text, a picture and two buttons in it. When I close it, stats returns 1276368 bytes. |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4974x2] | got a screenshot ? |
of the rich text? | |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4976x2] | contains secret info, can't show it. :-) |
I think there is a blurred one somewhere... | |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4978x2] | geez ... |
secrets ... | |
Henrik 11-Oct-2007 [4980x3] | http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/stuff/r3-alpha-splash.jpg<-- it's pretty old. the new one contains clickable links. |
doing something in R2 would probably require 5-6 MB memory. | |
something like that | |
Graham 11-Oct-2007 [4983] | where's the rich text? |
older newer | first last |