r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5454]
I'm not interested in having this whole argument all over again. 
I asked a simple question and eventually I got my answer: since a 
few weeks, Core is delayed for another month and View for several 
more months
GiuseppeC
13-Dec-2007
[5455x2]
It happened ! Now it is already history.
It is past. It has been surely a mistake but it happened and it is 
past. Now we must move from the incidend and have a positive approach. 
A stalled discussion does not help anyone.
BrianH
13-Dec-2007
[5457]
Actually, /Core wasn't going to exist at all, but now something like 
/Core will be released as a public alpha.
GiuseppeC
13-Dec-2007
[5458x2]
GOOD ! More months means we will have a better product !
(Kaj, please remember my words: "Positive approach is the way" !
Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5460]
Please tell me how I can be more positive than building two operating 
systems and convincing everyone to integrate REBOL in them?
GiuseppeC
13-Dec-2007
[5461]
Kaj, I agree with you: you did your part on promoting Rebol and I 
respect you for your position.
Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5462]
I would really like to have some support back
BrianH
13-Dec-2007
[5463]
Check your private chat then.
GiuseppeC
13-Dec-2007
[5464x5]
I know. I want to say this to you: I have even written to Rebol Tech 
asking for a pricing on both SDK/Command and having no answer.
I could have 2 approach: start screaming everywere stating that they 
don't even care to give the users a price or understandig that there 
is something wrong behind the scenes that does need our patience 
waiting to be solved.
I am sure, you did your best but the positive approach is waiting 
to cooperate. Now it is their turn to make something. Not our.
A last word as I have flooded this groups of message. Think about 
this situation there are 2 ships, both are sinking; on the first 
ship the passengers start fighting the crew of the sinking , on the 
second the passengers cooperates with the crew to save more lifes 
as possible. Which approach will give the best results ?
Now it is time for me to sleep. Here in Italy it is 5 to 1 am. Good 
night !
Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5469]
Syllable is not sinking ;-)
GiuseppeC
13-Dec-2007
[5470]
What you mean ?
amacleod
13-Dec-2007
[5471x3]
Kaj, ths is not the proper group to ask questions about Syllable 
but I do not see a Syllable group here...
And the web site left me with a few questions
I'm downloadng the live version to give it a wirl.
Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5474]
New people here do not get into the Syllable group, as some people 
wanted it to be private
GiuseppeC
13-Dec-2007
[5475]
Ok, I have found Syllable on the internet. No more questions here. 
Good night dear collegues.
Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5476]
Giuseppe asked about my projects, though
amacleod
13-Dec-2007
[5477]
I'm an old Amiga guy and Syllable reminds me a bit of Amiga (from 
the site). I would be interested in joining that group if possible.
Kaj
13-Dec-2007
[5478x2]
I just added both of you. You can remove yourself if you want
And, it oncestarted out as an Amiga clone :-)
PeterWood
14-Dec-2007
[5480]
Louis: From what I can tell from DocBase; initially the unicode support 
will be that the Rebol source will be UTF-8 encoded. The next step 
seems to be changing string! to UTF-8 encoding.


It looks as though work hasn't yet started on the unicode! datatype.
Pekr
14-Dec-2007
[5481]
as for UTF8 - is it compatible to current +128 char extension? I 
mean e.g. czech alphabet uses special characters above 128 ASCII 
value ....
Louis
14-Dec-2007
[5482]
Peter, thanks. The progress of unicode support is vefy important 
to me.
Pekr
14-Dec-2007
[5483]
really? well, then you should know that first alpha with unicode 
support was released for testing :-)
Louis
14-Dec-2007
[5484]
That is great! :>)  Thanks for that news, Pekr.
BrianH
14-Dec-2007
[5485]
UTF-8 is a strict extention of ASCII, but ASCII is only defined between 
0 and 127. Characters 128+ are not ASCII, they are extensions, and 
their meaning depends on the codepage. The codepage of an 8-bit string 
is unknown, unless you specify it externally (or do a lot of statistical 
calculations). Strings or scripts with characters extended by a codepage 
will have to be translated by a codepage-to-utf-8 function or process 
specific to the particular codepage, ahead of time. Fortunately, 
such a process can be fast and even implemented in a byte-oriented 
language easily.
GiuseppeC
14-Dec-2007
[5486]
Other than UNICODE, will there be an UNISEX version of the interpreter 
? :-)
Pekr
14-Dec-2007
[5487x2]
what? sex? :-)
rebol is sexy already :-)
GiuseppeC
14-Dec-2007
[5489]
Sometime better than, you have more fun !
PeterWood
14-Dec-2007
[5490]
BrianH: I undertstood that UTF-8 can be multi-byte depending on the 
Unicode of the character being represented.
BrianH
14-Dec-2007
[5491x2]
Yup.
ASCII characters fit in one byte, the rest take some more. It can 
progress up to 5 bytes but those are rare.
PeterWood
14-Dec-2007
[5493]
Is my reading of Docbase correct that string! values will be UTF-8 
encoded?
BrianH
14-Dec-2007
[5494]
That is currently under discussion.
PeterWood
14-Dec-2007
[5495]
Thanks....if there is a vote please add mine to that of Louis.
Kaj
19-Dec-2007
[5496]
I'm happy to report that the preliminary Linux port of R3 alpha, 
which offers REBOL/Core functionality, runs on Syllable Server
Henrik
19-Dec-2007
[5497x2]
nice :-)
Kaj, you're welcome to document any bumps in the porting process. 
We will need it all for porting to other systems.
Kaj
19-Dec-2007
[5499x2]
I will, but I didn't do any porting yet. This is just an ad-hoc binary 
build I got
I will need the open host source code to get further
amacleod
27-Dec-2007
[5501]
Is it time for some news/update? A little tickle to stoke the excitement 
 for us on the outside.
Henrik
27-Dec-2007
[5502x2]
well, I have a new rebcore.exe file in my r3 internal release directory, 
which is different from the other internal releases. I'm not yet 
sure what that means. :-) (seriously)
I know people are cooking up some nice examples for a public release, 
but it's not ready yet.