r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Pekr
9-Jan-2008
[5560x2]
btiffin - what about PowerShell from MS? Haven't tried yet ...
well, just downloaded PowerShell and it boots 3 - 5 secs on my Core2 
Duo, 2 GB RAM :-) It can't run executables or I don't know how - 
it seems that it extends commands for Windows admins, dunno how to 
launch externall app from that :-)
[unknown: 5]
9-Jan-2008
[5562]
Thanks BrianH.
btiffin
9-Jan-2008
[5563]
Petr;  It was the MS "Genuine Vista" info grab for the free download 
that led me to Cygwin.  :)  I dutifully registered both my copies 
of Vista, and what?  MS doesn't remember?  <swearword> 'em.  I never 
tried PowerShell.  Once I discovered rxvt I quit searching.  Kinda 
like REBOL.  My progamming language quest is over.  Now the (language) 
interest is only cursory and even though I try and check out something 
new just about everyday ... nothing competes.  Go REBOL Go!
Pekr
9-Jan-2008
[5564]
Googling, I just found out, that Cygwin allows also some other consoles. 
Poderosa allows tabs, that might be interesting running multiple 
sessions and switching between them ...
BrianH
9-Jan-2008
[5565]
I can't wait until DevBase goes public. We could definitely use some 
help with these kind of bugs.
btiffin
9-Jan-2008
[5566]
Brian;  Umm...Carl gave the nod to release the url for DevBase to 
the REBOL friendly a few days after it's initial rollout.  Has that 
changed?
Pekr
9-Jan-2008
[5567]
BrianH - you should notice Carl privately about the need to accept 
latest submissions. Well, once done, do you think we are mostly ready 
for full R3 upload? I mean - all View and host C code?
BrianH
9-Jan-2008
[5568x2]
Yeah. The security model doesn't scale right now. I have designed 
a new security model and am almost done implementing it.
The !DevBase group would be a better place for this discussion.
Kaj
9-Jan-2008
[5570]
Same here, BrianT. It's nice to come home after a journey
Micha
10-Jan-2008
[5571]
there is the better solution ?

handl: func [event /local port] [  probe  event/type


port: event/port

switch event/type [

connect [  print  [ now port/spec/host  ]
           write port [ GET %/index.html ]  false]

read [ false ]


wrote [ false]


done [   print  [ port/spec/host  length? event/port/data ]  true]

close [ close port true]
error [ close port true]


] 

]




get-fast: func [hosts /local port ][



 foreach hst hosts [
  port: make port!  to-url join http:// hst 

  port/awake: :handl
  open port

wait 0.03
 ]


]

;example

urls: [
www.rebol.com
www.rebol.net
;"www.rebol.org"
www.apple.com
;"www.oracle.com"
;"www.google.com"

]
loop 10 [get-fast urls]
btiffin
10-Jan-2008
[5572]
All;  I'm the volunteer for the new VID 3 documentation.  (And don't 
really feel that worthy, but that can't be an excuse to make it complete, 
concise and a nice read ... anyway ...)  It's only just in initial 
draft still (my bad), but it's all to save Gabriele and the rest 
of the core team time so they can get to the important bits.  


If you have anything that needs clarification, discoveries, how-to, 
complaints, well anything; please drop a note to this group, the 
btiffin user chat or please feel free to update the discussions page 
from http://rebol.net/wiki/VID_User_Guideand we'll try and keep 
some of the flotsam and jetsom noise out of Carl, Gabriele, Richard 
and Henrik's way while they finalize the REBOL 3 VID.   (And being 
a wiki, feel free to update the actual doc for that matter; keeping 
in mind that consistent style and tone is also one of the goals.).

Thanks and cheers.
[unknown: 5]
10-Jan-2008
[5573]
btiffin, I would prioritize all the new stuff at first to get everyone 
up to speed.  I know that Carl use to supply us with a changes document 
to simply update us on the changes with a new release.  That might 
suffice better to get everyone up to speed faster.
BrianH
10-Jan-2008
[5574]
Perhaps another page referenced in the Welcome section. VID3 is based 
on a different semantic model, so we shouldn't expect there to be 
a whole lot in common with VID2. It would probably be better to not 
confuse the VID3 docs with comparisons to VID2.
Rod
10-Jan-2008
[5575x2]
Brian, that is a huge bunch of work you have got in there already! 
 Will try and give a hand with the obvious things at least though 
I am less worthy than you by a good bit.
Has any Mac user tried to get the Alpha going yet, via parallels 
on an intel mac or darwine on a ppc mac?
Jean-François
10-Jan-2008
[5577]
btiffin, I was playing a bit with VID3 today and had trouble with 
Options. I think it would be good to have a listing of the Options 
available for each Style. 

In particular, I was trying to control the lenght of a field, alas 
without success.
Gabriele
11-Jan-2008
[5578x3]
Jean: mainly because things are not complete yet. in the end, options 
will be more consistant across styles (and they will look a bit more 
like CSS when it comes to look options).
in any case, the size of a field can be set by providing a second 
string. ideally, that would be the "mask" string (that tells what 
chars are allowed and so on), but it's currently only used as an 
example to determine the size.
for eg, if your field will hold a percentage, you could write:   
field "3%" "100%"     so that it will be appropriately sized so that 
"100%" would be visible in it without scrolling.
Henrik
11-Jan-2008
[5581x2]
REBOL 3 works fine in VMWare Fusion on an intel mac.
it is also currently the only way for me run run rebol 2 :-)
Will
11-Jan-2008
[5583]
Henrik, you mean rebol2/view right? Would it take much time for Carl 
to build an intel version for osx ?
Henrik
11-Jan-2008
[5584x3]
I imagine he's quite busy right now.
but yes, I would love a version for OSX Leopard
and yes, I meant REBOL/View :-) Core runs fine.
TomBon
11-Jan-2008
[5587]
nice alpha, any chance to get get some pre-information how to use/test 
 task!  ?   f-t: make task! [ ] [  print now/precise] ?
Pekr
11-Jan-2008
[5588x2]
I did only some small test ... I posted some short console data, 
but can't remember where :-)
>> test: make task! [wait 10 print ["Does tasking work?" newline]]
== task!
>> do test
Begin Task
== task!
>> print "Doing something else in console..."
Doing something else in console...
>> Does tasking work?

End Task

>>
TomBon
11-Jan-2008
[5590x2]
thx pekr,  will try this.
strange, wait - within the task will crash rebol
Pekr
11-Jan-2008
[5592]
really? Above code worked back in October ...
TomBon
11-Jan-2008
[5593x3]
yes, it works via console but not with vid
test: make task! [wait 10 print ["Does tasking work?" newline]]

 view [

    h2 "Task" 
    button "Start" 	[do test]
    button "Stop"  	[   ]
    button "Quit" 	[unview none]
]
without wait it works..but ok it's alpha...
Gregg
11-Jan-2008
[5596]
Confirmed.
BrianH
11-Jan-2008
[5597]
Tasks don't work very well yet. AFAIK, this will be solved after 
modules are finalized, after Unicode.
Pekr
11-Jan-2008
[5598]
new blog regarding loading, encoders/decoders - http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0109.html
btiffin
12-Jan-2008
[5599]
TomBon;  Last I heard, Carl confirmed that tasks are not yet advertised 
as ready for primetime.
Henrik
12-Jan-2008
[5600]
modules are probably a good thing to test. we have only few test 
cases for that.
TomBon
12-Jan-2008
[5601]
thx for the info btiffin.
Rod
13-Jan-2008
[5602]
Henrik, thanks for the vmware note, good to know - also the issue 
with rebol 2 on the newer macs, wasn't thinking about both sides 
of the problem.
Henrik
13-Jan-2008
[5603]
It seems to work on macs that were upgraded from Tiger without doing 
a clean install or an archive and install. Some library is being 
carried over from the Tiger install, I think.
Rod
13-Jan-2008
[5604]
Ah, I remember the issue now.  That is a pain, it does work fine 
for me in Leopard.  If you need more help tracking down what is different 
let me know, don't mind poking around for you.  I have both intel 
and ppc macs that are still on tiger that might help as well.
Henrik
13-Jan-2008
[5605x3]
well, I've tried digging out the version numbers for libraries used 
on both Leopard machines that work and Leopard machines that don't 
work and the version numbers are the same.
It's possible, although unlikely, that 10.5.2 would fix the issue, 
but I don't know.
I would imagine that REBOL isn't the only program that stopped working 
like this.
Will
13-Jan-2008
[5608]
at least not on 10.5.2 beta
TomBon
14-Jan-2008
[5609]
I know it's far away but what are the design-plans for compiling 
with the upcoming SDK3. 

Do we still compile/pack into one executable file, or one executable 
+ hostlib?

It is one !extrem! cool feature that compiled/packed rebol doesn't 
need additional files 
even own system lib's or other garbage/bloatware to run.