r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Graham
24-May-2008
[5884x2]
Just seems to be a lack of participation in the R3 process ... and 
I'm wondering if it's because the changes are too great
If there were a way we could incorporate the changes into projects 
we are currently working on ... it just might make it easier
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5886]
I think it's because the changes are very large, yes. It's rather 
impossible to do any real GUI work as long as VID3 is sitting in 
this current state, where we're trying to figure out how VID3 should 
work and that things might change from week to week.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5887]
What's the best way to get started?
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5888]
with what part of R3?
Graham
24-May-2008
[5889x3]
There's just too much information there at present ...
playing with Vid3
I see Carl's current intention is to nail Vid3 down
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5892x2]
probably get one of last year's builds and simply toy around with 
the layout dialect. current builds have VID3 left out.
yes, there are some design issues in that style creation is too complex 
and must be simplified. Carl and Gabriele are sorting that out in 
private.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5894]
we need an dummy's guide to vid3
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5895x2]
we have one, but it's too complex :-)
well, actually I don't think it fits with the latest VID3 build
Graham
24-May-2008
[5897]
Ok, an idiot's guide then!
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5898x2]
the dialect itself is easy enough.
it's probably a good idea to study it in order to find out how faces 
can work together and such.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5900]
I suspect we are only going to find it's limitation by starting to 
build small apps and see how it scales
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5901]
it's probably mostly limited by the number of styles currently.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5902]
which build has Vid3 in it?
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5903]
the public release
Graham
24-May-2008
[5904x2]
which is where?  I'm getting circular links
http://www.rebol.com/rebol3/=> http://www.rebol.com/article/0347.html
=> http://www.rebol.com/rebol3/
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5906]
http://www.rebol.net/wiki/R3_Releases
Graham
24-May-2008
[5907]
Ok.  Thanks.
Henrik
24-May-2008
[5908]
gotta go to bed. there are some more docs about VID3 in Docbase.
Pekr
24-May-2008
[5909]
My take is VID3 will not stay way it is now ...
Graham
24-May-2008
[5910x3]
Meaning?
too complex?
Is there much point at looking at it until Carl has decided where 
it's going?
Pekr
24-May-2008
[5913]
I think not ...
btiffin
24-May-2008
[5914]
I was told to hold off on documentation for VID3 months ago; pre 
Unicode release even.  And I may not be the best tech writer for 
the task anyway; as I didn't really "get it" to a level required 
to write the good end-user docs REBOL deserves.  We'll see what happens 
in the upcoming days.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5915]
Perhaps we need a "rebgui" for R3 as well ... ie. a simplified gui
btiffin
24-May-2008
[5916]
That's what I hinted to on the blog.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5917]
though should a simple gui scale to a complex one?
btiffin
24-May-2008
[5918]
But Gabriele is a super smart REBOL coder; so I'd like to see his 
efforts rewarded. I just couldn't keep up with some of it; at least 
not quickly enough to  produce end user docs that made any sense. 
 :)
Graham
24-May-2008
[5919x3]
two development efforts don't make much sense though
Some of Gabriele's stuff does tend to be somewhat hard to use
Though that could just be a documentation problem
btiffin
24-May-2008
[5922]
I trust Carl to come up with something nifty.   VID2 is a dialect 
layer on the View engine, and I think Carl appreciated Ashley's work. 
 Much like the inventor a new paint watching an artist make a wicked 
cool painting.


Yeah, to do a proper job of documenting Gabriele's work requires 
some practice.  I try and write the user doc for his pdf maker "in 
pdf maker", and end up just confused enough to not make it work to 
a satisfactory level.  But I'll say, his work deserves to be rewarded 
more than it is currently.
Graham
24-May-2008
[5923]
building software is a constant re-engineering process
btiffin
24-May-2008
[5924x3]
I was just about to add;  then again (re reward) so does yours, Gregg's 
Sunanda's Ashley's Nenad's Oldes' John's Paul's Henrik's  Maarten's 
.... oh so many.  It's like the entire community is a bunch of under 
appreciated super stars   :)
And mainly due to the size of the user base.  We don't have enough 
hands to use (let alone even try) all the cool nifty stuff that is 
produced.
Even the user.r rebol of the year only has one official nomination 
so far.   :(
Graham
24-May-2008
[5927]
who is MIA at present ?
btiffin
24-May-2008
[5928x2]
From the nom list I'd like to see?   Doc, Paul, you, Gregg, Sunanda; 
Oldes; BrianH, oh so many that deserve a great big banner of appreciation. 
 Richard; Reichart; (a ton of the Qtask staffers) etc etc etc.
Gee; Gabriele, Ladislav (I think of ten more as soon as I quit typing) 
 :)  Petr, Henrik ...  more, many more.
Gabriele
25-May-2008
[5930]
guys, i have no problems in taking my VID out of R3 if you feel that's 
a problem. just let us know sooner rather than later.
Graham
25-May-2008
[5931]
I have not tried your VID3
btiffin
25-May-2008
[5932x2]
Gabriele;  ???  NOOO!   Sorry you read my cheerleading that way. 
 I was diss'in me not you.  It was my lame attempt to explain why 
some the VID3 docs aren't up to the snuff that they should be.   
As I've said before ... keep on writing the mondo complex stuff so 
the rest of don't have to.  :)
rest of US don't have to.