World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Terry 17-Sep-2008 [7004] | It was the lack of easy acess to S3 that caused me to finally bail from Rebol. And it's still getting discussed..in PHP you can drop in a S3 class and be up and running in 5 minutes. Face it, a language with no community is no language. And by community, I mean > 10000 daily users. The shame is, Rebol is a great language. Personally, I blame the license... the world changed, and failing to change with it is obscurity doom. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2008 [7005] | It's much more than the license, but RT is not unwilling to change. Apart from the core license, R3 fixes all other uptake issues. It's just unfortunate that it came to be a package deal that's hard to finish |
BrianH 17-Sep-2008 [7006x2] | Maarten is working on S3 support. |
As he said above. | |
Ashley 18-Sep-2008 [7008] | Face it, a language with no community is no language I wouldn't judge REBOL's adoption rate purely by the number of people who regularly post in this world. I receive a lot of email from folks using stuff I've written in their day-to-day jobs and they don't post here or to the mail list ... I've even spoken to a few startups who are going into business primarily on the strength of REBOL and "time to market". Whether a "killer app" will ever be REBOL-based is the big question ... |
Graham 18-Sep-2008 [7009] | I don't think we need x number of users to validate our own choices in using Rebol. |
Henrik 18-Sep-2008 [7010] | I'm not using REBOL based on its number of users. Never was. |
Ashley 18-Sep-2008 [7011] | I think Carl will find other things to do in life if interest falls below a certain level. |
shadwolf 18-Sep-2008 [7012x13] | i don't think so ... |
carl does rebol more for fun than for profits and since he gets fun and new ideas he want to build in rebol there is no way rebol dies ... | |
do amiga PCs stopped interresting people the day the company closed ? | |
not at all you still now in day have fan of it that tweak it for educational purpose or research | |
and rebol is intemporal like all languages. But yes we can say it's unknown and that's in my opinion a pitty. | |
What solutions we have to make rebol better known ? hum .... vast question and many ways to answer it | |
better known means more visibility more people claiming they use rebol because it's the best and nothing else ... | |
but quite franckly for the end user what ever the language is until the software he use feets his needs ... | |
now you have several scripting languages and most of them are a "success" because of their easy interoperability like lau or VB script... | |
or python | |
and some other are succes because of their specialisation like PHP wich outside a web server can't exist | |
and some other because simply you don't have accès to the source code like java (yes I know ....) | |
but the least we can say it that Carl is not so wrong in his vision because the need to extrapolate the hardware and the software is a more and more a need in software making industry those20 past years you get a lot of scripting languages created | |
amacleod 18-Sep-2008 [7025] | With out the community we have here I would not get too far with REBOL. Most of the apps I try to make can not be done out of the box without a lot of expertise and code add-ons that I get from you guys. For a novice reboler the community is essential...there really is no other source. |
Maarten 18-Sep-2008 [7026] | REBOL won't die. Consider that a statement. |
btiffin 18-Sep-2008 [7027] | Hear hear! hear, all ye good people, hear what this brilliant and eloquent speaker has to say! |
Graham 18-Sep-2008 [7028x2] | Carl is making very good progress on the new VID system .. expect a new blog very soon. |
It's going to be a much more scaleable vector driven system | |
Henrik 18-Sep-2008 [7030] | There was a large amount of work spent on simplification. More than originally anticipated. |
Graham 18-Sep-2008 [7031] | I'm all for simplification as it increases the number of potential users |
Terry 19-Sep-2008 [7032] | The world has moved on. The browser is THE client, everything is moving into the cloud, and will continue to do so, and apps need to be mobile (read work on iPhone). |
Robert 19-Sep-2008 [7033] | Terry, I'm still convinced that the whole "the browser is the client" thing will implode. It's just the wrong concept. You just have to many parts, protocols, plug-ins, versions, etc. involved to get it ever secure and reliable. |
Terry 19-Sep-2008 [7034x3] | I think the only reason it won't implode is the size of the user base.. millions, if not billions, are spent working around any issues. It will evolve. |
I picked up a 3G to replace my 1st gen iphone today.. screw Rebol.. give me Cocoa. | |
And I don't even own a Mac. | |
Pekr 19-Sep-2008 [7037x3] | Terry - then explain me, why everybody tries to move away from browser with their RIA? Flash/Flex, Silverlight, etc.? |
Screw REBOL, give me Cocoa ... nice ... so where is my Cocoa for Windows? :-) | |
The mobile market is even more crowded. WinMobile 6.1, Symbian, iPhone (OS-X ?), Android, OpenMoko (various linux mini OS variants) | |
Terry 19-Sep-2008 [7040] | I don't think they're tyring to move away from the browser so much as trying to bring the desktop towards the browser... probably just because they can.. and I don't believe those technologies will get much traction.. especially compared to the browser. |
Pekr 19-Sep-2008 [7041] | You are the second one who said "because they can" ... interesting :-) |
Terry 19-Sep-2008 [7042x2] | My question is this.. "What is the end game?" Is everything going to be a little RIA? I doubt it. A clunky browser? Probably not. |
Where wil it be in 10, 25, 100 years? | |
Pekr 19-Sep-2008 [7044x2] | Do you know the answer? |
I said it xy years ago, that it will happen. Nowadays browser is considered being "universal app container" ... the strange thing is, that while it provides crap speed (even with AJAX) compared to native apps, ppl are forgivable here. But - in order for browser to keep its chances, we need to keep the standards. Looking at W3C and all its MLs, I wonder how cross platform, cross browser support goes. There are technologies for multimedia like SMIL, etc., SVG - crappy supported. | |
Terry 19-Sep-2008 [7046] | Some things are timeless. - Everything is data. - Software is a solution to a problem, or some form of entertainment. |
Pekr 19-Sep-2008 [7047] | And now we can see Google trying to keep their own agenda - moving ppl to Gears ... which has nothing in common with standards - it is linking ppl to use their services .... and off-line app support? There are some first tries, but that is it - just only tries - no standard for off-line apps. We recently collapsed our CRM system, because thinking that today's world is fully on-line, is wishfull thinking. So we are developing off-line plus sync ... |
Terry 19-Sep-2008 [7048x4] | Storage was once an huge issue.. not anymore. internet transfer rate was once a huge issue.. not anymore. Always on connectivity will fall as well. |
Personally, I think it boils down to 'solutions' rather than technologies. My wife couldn't care less how the photos get from here to Australia. | |
To much emphasis here is spent of technology .. and very little on solutions... like S3 support, API mashups blah blah blah. | |
The greatest killer app the world has ever seen could very well be built using Rebol, which would generate a massive following overnight. However, the killer app itself will be about an idea.. not something special Rebol offers, or any other language for that matter. When it boils down, all languages are pretty much the same. It becomes a religious thing and a preference. There's a strong tendency in this biz for developers to stick with what they know, even if the alternative is 'better' (whatever that means) | |
Pekr 19-Sep-2008 [7052x2] | We should probably move to advocacy group .... |
As for REBOL3, I can't see bigger impact than some custom app development, or even some killer app. | |
older newer | first last |