World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Henrik 30-Nov-2008 [8451x2] | ok |
must go. I'll be back tomorrow. | |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8453] | Is there any way to get our hands on the latest Alpha build? I would like to start to plan for migration to REBOL3 of some scripts and plan for REBOL3 in current work. Especially regarding ports and series handling. |
Graham 30-Nov-2008 [8454x2] | http://www.rebol.net/builds/rebol3/alpha/rebol29904031.zip |
jan 08 | |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8456] | Is that the latest? I thought there was a bunch of port work since then? |
Graham 30-Nov-2008 [8457] | latest public version ... |
PeterWood 30-Nov-2008 [8458] | That is the latest public release, it does not include unicode support. |
Graham 30-Nov-2008 [8459] | Why do you think we have been arguing for a newer public release?? |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8460] | ok - thanks Graham. I think I already got that one. |
PeterWood 30-Nov-2008 [8461] | Carl has promised a new release in "a few hours" in his latest blog. |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8462] | cool - thanks PeterWoo |
Graham 30-Nov-2008 [8463] | hmm ... heard it all before |
PeterWood 30-Nov-2008 [8464] | To be more accurate "With luck, within the next few hours." |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8465x2] | Yeah just read that last sentence on the blog. |
Good, I may be able to make something cool for when it gets released. | |
PeterWood 30-Nov-2008 [8467] | I think it is worth remembering that it is an alpha version not a beta. It is still likely to change a lot before a beta is released. |
Graham 30-Nov-2008 [8468] | I must have been grumbling louder than I thought if he could hear me in ukiah |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8469] | Well I have to think at this point the ports would most likely be pretty much finished since ports are so fundamental to so many other things in REBOL. |
PeterWood 30-Nov-2008 [8470] | For example, somebody stated that the GUI does not yet handle unicode strings. |
[unknown: 5] 30-Nov-2008 [8471x2] | Keep Grumbling Graham! lol. |
But the lower level Unicode stuff is done I think if I recall correctly. | |
PeterWood 1-Dec-2008 [8473] | Personally, I''m doubtful of the value of a new release at this stage other than a tangible display of progress. From all that has been told in public, this release will have lots of unfinished code and no doubts lots of loose ends. |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8474] | Peter - half a piece of cake is better than none if you're ( intellectually ) starving. |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8475x2] | Actually, Paul brings up the value of a release at this point: We need R3 apps for development to continue at this stage. We are at a point where we need people to write stuff that uses what we have so far so we can shake out the bugs. To do that, we need to get what we have in the hands of more people. |
It will be an exciting time. You won't be able to assume that your code will continue to run unchanged on future builds, but your code will influence the changes made in the future, and any bugs you run into will get fixed. It should be fun :) | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8477x2] | Sounds like you're arguing for Carl to release now and not wait for his BBS script! |
Does Carl ever get cognitive dissonance? | |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8479] | I would if he were talking about DevBase (and did), but I think you are overestimating just how long it will take to write. We aren't talking about a web forum here, it is clear from the blog that he is talking about a R3 GUI client. He can knock that out in no time. |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8480x2] | 3 hours? |
Client to what? | |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8482x3] | We could write a server using the methods and code of DevBase - it wouldn't even have to run on R3 at first. |
DevBase uses the database of AltME to store its data, has a working R/S interface, runs just fine. Change the data model and you would have a forum server. Servers are really very similar. | |
It doesn't even have to have a web interface at first, and then we could write one on Cheyenne. | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8485x4] | Well, if that allows Doc to fix Cheyenne .. I'm all for that. |
I think I'd like to a BBS based in the cloud eventually. | |
S3 for message storage, SDB for message tags and indices | |
SQS for chat. | |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8489x2] | By "eventually" and "not at first", I mean after the R3 release. We are already using Cheyenne for the bug tracker, and we will be putting in bug reports to that as well on the tracker itself. Bugs don't get fixed if they don't get noticed, and they don't get noticed if the tool isn't getting used. We need users for R3, and those users are apps. |
I think we don't always realize that we are not the users on REBOL, our programs are. We just write the programs. | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8491x3] | That's silly. |
If there is no one to notice the errors ... | |
It's like saying the paint is the user of the canvas. | |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8494x2] | Naw, it's easy. Just think of the users of REBOL as being so stupid that they can't figure out how to solve any problem, but that they are the ones doing the work. The managers of our users need to be able to tell the users what to do with little understanding of how exactly our users actually do what they do. The programmers are the managers, the programs are the users. Our job is to mame it easy for the programs to do their jobs without requiring the programmers to learn so much about the internals that they are essentially doing the job of the programs. We want to reduce micromanagement. |
mame -> make | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8496] | http://www.rebol.net/wiki/RebTalk_Forum |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8497] | First client prototype (30-Nov-2008) 8.1 KB in size, and first server, 4.6 KB. Written by Carl Sassenrath. :) |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8498x3] | and very busy already data: [ ] [command-error] |
Now how to force a client update each time you change some functionality? | |
Perhaps the client should download the source each time ... | |
older newer | first last |