World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8501] | DevBase does that (though it caches locally in the R2 version). |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8502x2] | My vidwiki client downloaded a new layout for each page .... |
ie. emulating what browser clients did ( sort of ) | |
BrianH 1-Dec-2008 [8504x2] | You would only need to download a changed version. This looks like a good job for a REBOL browser reblet. |
Using it already, though it has some bugs to work out. These are R3 bugs which then get fixed :) | |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8506] | OK, if Carl wants to make a release now, then it will be without my skin (untested, not merged), so enjoy the colors. :-) |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8507] | Has he made a general release??? |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8508x2] | I don't think so, but he did say "a few hours". |
(I would translate that to "about 2 weeks") :-) | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8510] | We've already done the translation! |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8511] | iicari, I have a working solution from DideC now.Thanks for helping. |
ICarii 1-Dec-2008 [8512x2] | :) |
generic calendar module for R2 / R3 use can be found at http://rebol.mustard.co.nz/calendar.r - this assumes a minimal amount of data necessary to build a monthly calendar with optional first-day-of-weeks (rather than REBOLs default Monday..) | |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8514] | quite small. I will look into it. Thanks. |
PeterWood 1-Dec-2008 [8515] | Has the functionality that resided in the system object in R2 been moved to its new home in R3 yet? |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8516x2] | Now, there is in fact a part of the R3 GUI I want to release for testing and that is the color conversion functions. |
PeterWood, the system object is still there it seems. | |
PeterWood 1-Dec-2008 [8518] | So is this no longer valid? http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0020.html |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8519x5] | I think the existence of the system object is tightly coupled with modules which Carl has not been working on yet. BrianH knows more about it than me. |
I'm moving the color test discussion to r3-alpha. | |
Conclusion of test: Color conversion functions require latest alpha. :-) | |
But for those interested in reading the source code: http://www.hmkdesign.dk/rebol/r3/g-color.r | |
My webserver is now running again (temporarily on a laptop) | |
Sunanda 1-Dec-2008 [8524] | One step forward -- a demo/teaser for the REbtalk forum: http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0157.html |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8525] | Doesn't look like a way to choose unread threads |
Pekr 1-Dec-2008 [8526] | Now what is that once again? It once again looks as missorganised effort. Give me a break, please. This one is really not going to be better than Atlme, far from that. I thought, that when we were talking about REBOL forum, we were not talking REBOL based GUI? |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8527] | Hopefully someone will quickly write a browser client |
Pekr 1-Dec-2008 [8528] | If we want to have something cool, we should not aim anything less than IOS NG, based upon rebservices. As for me, I regard this client being only usefull for testing purposes, but I refuse to think in feature set it offers. |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8529] | Well, at least we found a couple of bugs that need to be fixed anyway, so the effort wasn't entirely wasted. |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8530] | Please post the source ... so we can write a Rebol plugin client |
Maarten 1-Dec-2008 [8531x3] | Carl makes R3 usable the only way you can... create a test application that has enough real world charateristics to be representative of real life work being done in R3. Look closer, you see: - server - async web network client - GUI - local and remote data storage and so on. |
Nothing as goof as a real user | |
*goof=good | |
Oldes 1-Dec-2008 [8534] | Pekr, do you really think that you may write complex apps without making simple one first? |
Pekr 1-Dec-2008 [8535] | No, but you could come up with any app. This plan to use it as a basis for the discussion is pretty much FLAWED. If used, it will distract us from altme, as well as it WILL NOT cover what the group was asking for - having the web forum. |
Oldes 1-Dec-2008 [8536x2] | I don't think this can be used for a web forum (with heavy trafic), but it's useful to find out what needs to be changed in the R3 design. That's the reason why Carl limit's access to releases. He does not want to confuse too many people as the design changes too fast. I guess, I'm not in the same group as Henrik. |
For me it would be enough, if unicode is already possible in the text areas of the new GUI. | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8538] | What's worse ... using php ( as we already do with mediawiki ), or your own BBS that can't handle loads? |
Pekr 1-Dec-2008 [8539x3] | Carl states in the blog, that he is considering to use it for developer's discussions, and I don't agree to that, unless I can see, that the plan is really well though out. It will not be forum, it will be still worse than altme, it will not be searchable, etc. |
If we state that it is some kind of typical communication test-bed, then I am ok with it. But then it belongs to trashcan. | |
then = after it fulfills its testing purposes | |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8542] | So, we still lack a forum for the new users |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8543] | Carl is seeking a solution to HIS communication needs. Not the USERS' communication needs. It seems to be a common pattern: That he starts developing something himself, because his needs are misunderstood. |
Oldes 1-Dec-2008 [8544] | I would not call it trashcan, but "how to" category |
Pekr 1-Dec-2008 [8545] | Henrik - wake me up, when after 3 months or half a year we found ourselves with another unfinished system, semi functional ... |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8546] | Bye, Pekr. :-) |
Oldes 1-Dec-2008 [8547] | O r you don't want to see how to make simple server/client in R3/ |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8548] | Pekr, BTW, my server is running again, in case you missed it. |
Graham 1-Dec-2008 [8549] | People spend years writing highly functional BBSs for communications |
Henrik 1-Dec-2008 [8550] | There you can see the container style in action. |
older newer | first last |