World: r3wp

But for those interested in reading the source code:

http://www.hmkdesign.dk/rebol/r3/g-color.r

My webserver is now running again (temporarily on a laptop)

One step forward -- a demo/teaser for the REbtalk forum:
http://www.rebol.net/r3blogs/0157.html

Doesn't look like a way to choose unread threads

Now what is that once again? It once again looks as missorganised 
effort. Give me a break, please. This one is really not going to 
be better than Atlme, far from that. I thought, that when we were 
talking about REBOL forum, we were not talking REBOL based GUI?

Hopefully someone will quickly write a browser client

If we want to have something cool, we should not aim anything less 
than IOS NG, based upon rebservices. As for me, I regard this client 
being only usefull for testing purposes, but I refuse to think in 
feature set it offers.

Well, at least we found a couple of bugs that need to be fixed anyway, 
so the effort wasn't entirely wasted.

Please post the source ... so we can write a Rebol plugin client

Carl makes R3 usable the only way you can... create a test application 
that has enough real world charateristics to be representative of 
real life work being done in R3.

Look closer, you see:
- server
- async web network client 
- GUI
- local and remote data storage

 and so on.

Nothing as goof as a real user

*goof=good

Pekr, do you really think that you may write complex apps without 
making simple one first?

No, but you could come up with any app. This plan to use it as a 
basis for the discussion is pretty much FLAWED. If used, it will 
distract us from altme, as well as it WILL NOT cover what the group 
was asking for - having the web forum.

I don't think this can be used for a web forum (with heavy trafic), 
but it's useful to find out what needs to be changed in the R3 design. 
That's the reason why Carl limit's access to releases. He does not 
want to confuse too many people as the design changes too fast. I 
guess, I'm not in the same group as Henrik.

For me it would be enough, if unicode is already possible in the 
text areas of the new GUI.

What's worse ... using php ( as we already do with mediawiki ), or 
your own BBS that can't handle loads?

Carl states in the blog, that he is considering to use it for developer's 
discussions, and I don't agree to that, unless I can see, that the 
plan is really well though out. It will not be forum, it will be 
still worse than altme, it will not be searchable, etc.

If we state that it is some kind of typical communication test-bed, 
then I am ok with it. But then it belongs to trashcan.

then = after it fulfills its testing purposes

So, we still lack a forum for the new users

Carl is seeking a solution to HIS communication needs. Not the USERS' 
communication needs. It seems to be a common pattern: That he starts 
developing something himself, because his needs are misunderstood.

I would not call it trashcan, but "how to" category

Henrik - wake me up, when after 3 months or half a year we found 
ourselves with another unfinished system, semi functional ...

Bye, Pekr. :-)

O r you don't want to see how to make simple server/client in R3/

Pekr, BTW, my server is running again, in case you missed it.

People spend years writing highly functional BBSs for communications

There you can see the container style in action.

Oldes - OK, you might be correct - for the andvanced users. As a 
"how to" 10KB of code might be too large :-)

The whole idea is confused and misplaced

Henrik - I am at home for 1 hours, being away in Prague - our company 
is running tender for the new website ...

Pekr, ok

If it's a test bed ... then don't call it a developers forum.

We talk too much even without BBS:) I'm rather going into a cave;-)

If it's a developer's forum ... it's grossly underpowered

If someone is going to spend weeks on improving it .. seems misplaced 
effort.

Henrik - somehow some screenshots show GUI being a bit distracting, 
not nicely placed elements ...

Pekr, alignment comes later

which one shows container?

It's everywhere. :-)

but fields and lists in particular use them.

is there also going to be an r3 release today as well or is the forum 
reblet all we're going to get?

the forum reblet needs r3

http://www.forummatrix.org/compare/Advanced-Electron-Forum%2BBeehive-Forum%2BdnfBB%2BE-Blah%2BJForum%2BmvnForum%2BmwForum%2BMyBB%2BNextBBS%2BPhorum%2BSMF%2BUnclassified-NewsBoard%2BVanilla%2BViscacha%2BXMB

and?

myBB looks good

Syntax highlighting must be done with a plugin

AdrianS, the forum reblet requires the latest R3 release.

(internal release, that is)