r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9876]
and i have no ftp currently T_T
Henrik
21-Jan-2009
[9877]
Steeve, why does CLEAR clear the whole block?
[unknown: 5]
21-Jan-2009
[9878x2]
Don't see nothing there but ads. Steeve, if you want something quick 
you can use mediafire.com
www.mediafire.com
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9880]
because there is now way to delete one or several records currently
Henrik
21-Jan-2009
[9881]
Steeve, ah, forgot that.
[unknown: 5]
21-Jan-2009
[9882]
Try that link above - it is good.
Henrik
21-Jan-2009
[9883]
Paul, try reloading the page a few times. It worked here.
[unknown: 5]
21-Jan-2009
[9884]
I had to put on compatibility mode but got it.
Henrik
21-Jan-2009
[9885]
(but I agree those sites generally suck)
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9886]
T_T
[unknown: 5]
21-Jan-2009
[9887x2]
I'm not sure I'm doing something right as I got an error.  Let me 
look thru the script.
Oh this requires R3 - duh.  I can't try this out yet.
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9889]
uhuh T_T
[unknown: 5]
21-Jan-2009
[9890]
I'll check it out in a few months.  ;-)
Henrik
21-Jan-2009
[9891]
Steeve, so the basic limitations now are natives that don't support 
ports?
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9892x4]
it seems
you can call the actor with his full path anyway, but' it's not rebolish
the main objective it to allow programers, to switch between normal 
blocks and virtual blocks when they want without the need to rewrite 
their code
brb (shower time)
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9896x3]
Watch out: R3 currently doesn't support documentation or anything 
other than whitespace (if that) before the REBOL header. Yes, it's 
a bug. You will need to remove the docmentation from the beginning 
of the script for this to run.
Steeve, I notice that there are several comments that start with 
BUG! or MISSING! - I expect to see CureCode tickets for each of these 
:)
Unless you would prefer I write them.
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9899x2]
Brian, it's strange i can run the script as-is
Brian write them please i'm a bit lazy with that bugs.
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9901x2]
Really? That's new. I'll test that and mark the associated ticket 
as tested if so :)
That was a comment on 2 messages past.
Will
21-Jan-2009
[9903]
ot, Brian: could you have Carl build a 2.7.7 alpha/beta with all 
the work you have done? shouldn't take much time for him 8)
PeterWood
21-Jan-2009
[9904]
Steeve: When you say the data are saved as Rebol values does that 
mean they are saved as molded Rebol values?
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9905]
Will, I haven't done a lot of work for R2 lately - only Anton has, 
afaik, and we haven't even gone over his submissions yet. After the 
R3 public release happens and the next DevBase is running we can 
work on a R2 release. More backports I hope :)
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9906]
Peter, yes it's molded values.
Will
21-Jan-2009
[9907]
Thanks for the status, Brian
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9908]
Nope, still doesn't work.
>> write %blah to-binary "hello^/rebol [] print 1"
>> do %blah
** syntax error: Script is missing a REBOL header: hello

** Note: use WHY? for more about this error
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9909]
Strange again, i do my script as-is and it works...
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9910x2]
SCRIPT? still doesn't work properly, because the native FIND-SCRIPT 
it calls still doesn't work properly.
Look again: Is the script you are doing the same as the one you posted, 
including the docs at the top?
Pekr
21-Jan-2009
[9912]
I like WHY? idea so much, dunno why :-) It looks so natural/simplistic 
...
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9913x3]
y
yep Mister Biran, it's the same
* Brian, sorry
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9916]
Weird. Do you use a different LOAD than the one in R3 by default, 
or a different SCRIPT?
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9917]
ahah no, i save my scripts in ANSI format
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9918x3]
I meant the function SCRIPT? not your text encoding :)
Question for the community:

It has been a long time since REBOL 2 was first released. Is it finally 
OK to remove the ELSE native from R3?
ELSE hasn't been used since R1, and has thrown an error since the 
first R2 betas. Can we get rid of it now?
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9921x2]
yes !!!! got it !!!
REBOL [] must be in uppercase it not, it failes.
Give me a medal Brian
*if not
BrianH
21-Jan-2009
[9923]
Cool, I'll update the ticket.
Steeve
21-Jan-2009
[9924x2]
it's not a bug Brian, onl
If the user doesn''t write REBOL in uppercase, he must be fired... 
;-)