World: r3wp

Is it Lotus Notes, you're talking about?

dir

ls

funny. dos in other window. oops.

PDFs are more "sexy" yes, but this is really only about the brains 
and brawns required to send graphical data directly from rebol to 
a printer in a proper way.

Well, at IBM  it depends on whom you're dealing with. We have worked 
with the guys at the Watson labs and they are very progressive. The 
people in the field that we know, however, are all Word/Excel/PowerPoint 
. And they love their Lotus Notes.

Found a way to print images in windows: >mspaint /p file.bmp

Grats! :)

mspaint stays hidden. works nicely!

If only mspaint could be like Canvas!

Henrik, I think, supporting PS is a good thing! (TM) And we can still 
have PDF for those, who likes that. Has anyone done some work on 
PS in REBOL so far? Any scripts anywhere?

james, :-) :-)

I saw that MS Paint is receiving a technological upgrade in Vista: 
The palette has been moved from the bottom of the window to the top.

LOL

Wow!

Now that MS Innovation!

:D

When it can display a Workbench screen then I'll be impressed.

it will be interesting to see how rebol will run under it

Or will they have R#?

(bad joke, but I wouldn't be surprised)

Henrick print PS files only works if the printer has PS support. 
Not every printer has this, and Apple move NextStep from PS to PDF 
because the PS rendering engine of Adobe is expensive. So PS printing 
will only work for PS printers. I think that is sort of ok, but not 
sure everyone has a PS printer.

Not to discourage you. I think PDF is more universal and the PDF 
viewer can print to any printer, inkjets and lasers.

Also OSX can print PDFs directly, it can even render directly to 
any media, because it includes a PDF render in the OS.

In other platforms this is not that easy. You need that PDF renderer 
in the middle to be able to print ot inkjets.

I get lots of end-users (typically on Windows) asking me about PDF, 
with zero enquiries on PS. I'd go so far as to say that very few 
non-technical folks have even heard of PS these days.

I lean toward PDF too, but the dialect is not much fun to use, it 
can take a long time to load, and you have to preview it before printing, 
not too mention versioning issues. Thats why I had been looking for 
a BMP printing solution. I was considering using PS for printing 
only images directly to printers, which would still be nice--mainly 
for non-win OS's. I think this would be much easier to impliment. 
I dont know squat about post script, but it could potentially be 
just a hack.

you can use ghostscript to print pdf too afaik.

As I said in the pdf maker group ... postscript is a much easier 
thing to do than pdf.  I could then do high resolution graphs in 
postscript, and then use ghostscript or other utilities view and 
print.  Conversion to pdf is another possibility.

This is the unix way - lots of utilities to massage a format from 
one to another .. and not necessarily have the one product that acts 
as a swiss army knife.

printing to html and then printing to printer is just not good enough 
for many things.

this is a simple guide to postscript .. I read this the other day, 
and was programming in postscript the next.

http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/programming/postscript/postscript.html

Graham - either give me native rebol post script viewer, or forget 
it. I will not install ghost script - being there, done that. Because 
- today, in corporate sphere, there are two output interfaces - browser, 
or PDF Reader - noone will install anything else. I do agree that 
to get things right using html/css in cross browser manner may be 
pretty difficult task, but imo that postscript should be somehow 
- hidden?

Pekr, this discussion is not for you.

It's for those of us who want high quality printed output.

ah, how is that?

So, I suggest you just ignore this group.

I just state obvious, working for company with 3000 plus pcs, seeing 
trends from companies as SAP and IBM. If that is not relevant indication 
for you, then well ...

ok, I live this group, as I don't understand your arogancy

Nope .. it's not relevant to me.

live=leave

but maybe then it is not to Ashley even - reading what he thinks 
:-)

I have no wish to defend my desire to see a postscript emitter.  
I only wish to see it done by people who have a mutual interest. 
 If you don't think it is of interest, please do not post negative 
comments.

Here's a first attempt at drawing postscript and then converting 
to pdf ... http://www.compkarori.com/emr/growth.pdf

why negative. It is because you read is as a negative. My reaction 
translates to - if PS is good thing to have, then let's have it, 
but then it would be good to have native rebol ps viewer (in AGG) 
or there will be a trouble, if such a thing is dependant upon external 
viewer. And that is my experience here and I can guarantee you, that 
in terms of our big corp it would be a problem. But enough, do what 
you think is best ...

This might be of interest to Robert and Jaime who have new babies 
!

If I get time, I'll see if I can create a web service that turns 
growth data into CDC chart.

Both PostScript and PDF ref. manuals are found on www.adobe.com. 
I took a quick look and found out, that PDF is mainly a document 
format incl. things as hypertext links and logical structure information 
for document interchange. Postscript's primary application is to 
describe the appearance of text, graphical shapes, and sampled images 
on printed and displayed pages. It makes good sense producing PostScript 
from REBOL to enhance printing abilities, and if it's much easier 
than pdf (as Graham points out), there is good probability of success. 
And supporting PostScript doesn't exclude pdf. We can have both, 
and it's two different things with different goals.

Thank you.