r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins

JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1426x2]
I don't want to fragment this group, but one project I am working 
on now is the Console....so if you have any ideas for console improvements 
in R3.0 please let me know in private chat.
(Win32 Console to clarify)
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1428]
how about a group for that? there are a few things I'd like to see.
Graham
27-Jun-2006
[1429]
Wish things that were started could be finished ...
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1430]
but if there is many things started? :-)
Graham
27-Jun-2006
[1431x2]
this jumping around from one plan to another is very unsettling ...
we make plans based upon RT's announcements ...
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1433]
Well, as for plug-in, it is a pity, as last release has few things 
broken, fixing which would allow others to proceed ...
Graham
27-Jun-2006
[1434]
How can anyone plan anything ??
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1435]
According to the blog, now is the time Carl is supposed to be in 
France for several weeks? We will have to wait anyway ....
Graham
27-Jun-2006
[1436]
It destroys the inertia that was here .. people lose interest.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1437x2]
there are too few people working on the various parts
but it would be logical to finish R3 first and then focus on the 
other things afterwards. what's the use of the plugin if it needs 
to be reimplemented for R3?
Graham
27-Jun-2006
[1439x3]
because R3 is distant future
and plugin is now...
bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1442]
well, sort-of-now :-)
Graham
27-Jun-2006
[1443x2]
we don't know what bugs R3 will introduce
many of us will stick to R2 unti we see how stable R3 is ...
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1445]
right, but it would be easier if there was someone other than JoshM 
to keep the plugin fire going.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1446]
Graham may be right, unless R3 shows sometimes in two months or so. 
It is already one month late anyway, blog is filled mainly with rhetoric 
questions, to which decision is never announced .... so it is kind 
of worrying ;-)
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1447x2]
I need the plugin badly for some commercial projects and they can't 
go anywhere without a production ready plugin. But we all know that 
REBOL development tends to go in the "ohh... shiny" direction. :-)
we are comforted with the notion that everything will fall into place 
once R3 comes out.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1449x2]
hmm, I think Carl is responsible though, not Josh .....
but maybe Josh could beta-release here without Carl's permission? 
So no on the web, but here? I bet there is just few bugs remaining, 
which prevent from plug-in usage ...
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1451]
JoshM, don't want to ruin anything, but you could tell Carl that 
there were objections to this shift :-)
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1452]
it seems you guys had something in concrete planning for the plug-in, 
right?
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1453]
I had something in mind that would be used by thousands of customers 
potentially. I've been waiting for almost two years to implement 
it. That has to be implemented by someone else in AJAX now.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1454x3]
hmm, that is bad ...
but maybe that is how RT works with community? :-)
it still does not seem to work - communication is lacking ... Carl 
isolated himself (although it is understandable, he wants to fully 
concentrate), but although Gabriele tries to be helpfull, RT QA channel 
does not work. I bet Carl did not know about your plans, so the fault 
is on both sides ...
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1457]
it would just work a lot better if there were more people assigned 
to easier tasks and something that would be officially recognized. 
does RT themselves have to maintain docs and site? why do I have 
to wait 2 months to see a typo in a document fixed when I could do 
this myself?
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1458]
that is kind of general communication problem, and Gabriele should 
discuss it with Carl once he is back. Carl announced he want more 
involvement of community, yet the channels are closed from RT's side 
.....
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1459x2]
we are for example still lacking proper documentation for VID. there 
are still many secrets in it. A knowledgable person could write it, 
some one else could proof read it and make suggestions about documentation 
flow and Carl could comment on it and have the final say. But if 
I know Carl right, he's very hands-on, wants to do it himself. :-)
I talk about docs, because, at least I document my products...
JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1461]
I appreciate your comments....first off, I will forward them to Carl.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1462]
joshM, it's not your fault. you are doing a heck of a job.
JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1463x3]
Regarding the temporary hold on plugin development  -- you'll have 
to talk to him. But, I can tell you, that we want to make both the 
plugin and REBOL 3 as great as possible. In this case, there are 
some crucial things in REBOL 3 that we need to improve and those 
take priority.
But, regarding your needs for the plugin now.....I'm sure we can 
get some of these crucial bugs fixed.
The Win2k issue is serious...I didn't realize it was completely broken. 
We'll take a look at that. The only thing is that Carl is in France 
and I can't release w/o him, so it will probably have to wait untill 
he gets back in 3 weeks.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1466]
that's ok for me. I don't need it tomorrow, but it would be nice 
to develop my concepts for demoing in a few months time.
JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1467]
In the meantime, if you have any other crucial breaking bugs, please 
post them. (also, regarding stability: please try the plugin on a 
fresh, clean system first, because old plugin versions can sometimes 
mess things up).
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1468x2]
Graham: "How can anyone plan anything ??"

Henrik: "I had something in mind... I've been waiting for almost 
two years to implement ..."
Pekr: "that is kind of general communication problem..."

JoshM: "Regarding the temporary hold on plugin development  -- you'll 
have to talk to him"


Those are  reasons  why I move towards Orca, and I now moving towards 
other languages, until Orca is mature, you can't bet your future 
on Rebol, because over and over again things stay the same with little 
glimpses of hope that comes from small announcements, but not real 
change.
How amazing it is that Rebol has lost ground an oportunities, and 
every other language is developing and making progress at an incredible 
pace.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1470x2]
jaimevargas, well I sure hope that Orca will deliver
because it _will_ _most_ _certainly_ deliver, won't it? :-)
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1472]
I am not sure Orca will deliver, as Rebol lost momentum already, 
and unless Orca attracts new developers (which is imo unlikely), 
it is a tough problem. I wonder Kaj bets on Orca for Syllable.
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1473]
Until there is a change in RT in rebol polices rebol is going to 
lose market and mind share, and it risk being completely isolated, 
like it happen to Apple before to OSX, or scheme before PLT, or Smalltalk 
before seaside, or Ruby before rails. We need a push for real.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1474x2]
Yeah, you know the cure - open source. The rest hoped for RT's plan 
to keep the kernel, but release the rest. I wonder, why plug-in, 
which is completly unrelated to Rebol itself, was not released as 
open sourced ...
Jaime - so what is your environment of choice for the future being? 
Is that a Python?