World: r3wp
[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins
older newer | first last |
Pekr 27-Jun-2006 [1474x2] | Yeah, you know the cure - open source. The rest hoped for RT's plan to keep the kernel, but release the rest. I wonder, why plug-in, which is completly unrelated to Rebol itself, was not released as open sourced ... |
Jaime - so what is your environment of choice for the future being? Is that a Python? | |
JaimeVargas 27-Jun-2006 [1476] | Yes not many people willing to contribute to Orca, the sad thing is that I know of at least 3 more complete clones that have not been delivered due authors wish. So Rebol is quite fragmented. And all the hopeshare goes to RT. I wish people could gather around just one code base, and work like many other comunities, but there is something here holding people back. |
Pekr 27-Jun-2006 [1477] | author wish = Carl? |
JaimeVargas 27-Jun-2006 [1478x2] | Nope different authors. |
Karl Robillard is the only one that has come out with an actual viable clone, and the only one that keeps coding in the open and sharing. | |
Pekr 27-Jun-2006 [1480x2] | ah, I don't understand them then. Why so? Maybe because they don't want hurt RT? The question is, what is hurting the situation more :-) |
If RT would deliver on their plans, that there would be no objections, but :-) Did not know there are other full clones. I knew of one, but not three of them :-) | |
JaimeVargas 27-Jun-2006 [1482] | Pekr, my development choices are: Cross Platform Stand Alone Apps -> PLT-Scheme Web Apps -> Ruby-on-Rails OSX only Apps -> Cocoa or F-Script. |
Pekr 27-Jun-2006 [1483x3] | anyway - why not to open plug-in itself? Wasn't it said, that RT will keep the kernel, and the rest, including the concole, most parts of View, will be open-sourced? |
PLT - never heard of that ... | |
Could not Ruby be used for stand alone apps too? | |
JaimeVargas 27-Jun-2006 [1486] | Who knows, just like we don't understand any of the decisions or unkept promises. (We waited how long for OSX-SDK? How long for async, etc. So many promises, so little delivered). |
Pekr 27-Jun-2006 [1487] | I wonder why Python is missing - cross platform, really cross platform, including small devices, .Net, very large community, lots of tools around, etc. |
JaimeVargas 27-Jun-2006 [1488x2] | Pekr, Ruby and stand alone yes. But packaging is not as easy as PLT-Scheme, which just gives you a single binary like rebol. |
(That ends my ranting, Orca still has a chance if anyone time please feel welcome to contribute, I sign-off from this channel now) | |
Cyphre 29-Jun-2006 [1490x5] | I just tried to install the latest plugin for FireFox. I manually removed all previous version files but the automatic installation didn't work. I managed to get it working after I downloaded the whole instalation page locally and run it from my harddisk...very strange. Does anyone have simmilar problems? (I'm running Firefox 1.5.0.4 on WinXP SP1) |
Ah, found the problem. | |
The instalation popup window is not opening when you have set options->content->always warn when trying install new plugin (this is rough translation as I'm using Czech FireFox) and you don't have added www.rebol.com in 'trusted servers' in this option dialog. | |
Maybe this could be noted on the instalation page? | |
BTW it is interesting that Flash doesn't need such settings as I was able to install Flash plugin without having the flash server in the 'allowed servers'. Maybe they are using different instalation technique? | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1495] | I think it is in the instructions. I remember doing this. |
Cyphre 29-Jun-2006 [1496] | Ah yes! You are right :) Sorry, have to read it better next time :) |
Rebolek 29-Jun-2006 [1497] | but you're still right that flash does not require this. |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1498] | Perhaps they have some special dispensation? |
Cyphre 29-Jun-2006 [1499x2] | Maybe it is because it is 'official plugin' registered on firefox site? |
I think Rebol should 'officially register' once it gets to release state. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1501] | well... that won't be a while on account of the delay |
Rebolek 29-Jun-2006 [1502] | hm :/ |
JoshM 29-Jun-2006 [1503] | Yes, good idea. We are going to look at officially registering with Mozilla.org, that will eliminate the need to modify Exceptions list in FireFox. |
Volker 29-Jun-2006 [1504] | for security: Until the plugin is fixed, could it show an own page first where it ask "do you really want to run this script?". then it would be still easy to show a demo to friends, but not for others to sneak scripts in. |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1505x4] | Regarding comment above on "... jumping around from plan to plan....": |
Sorry, but we are not. Our plan has not changed in a long time. But, what you see are pieces of the plan in development in parallel. To explain... | |
REBOL 3.0 architecture consists of 3 tiers: environments, cores, plugins. | |
Environments are modules such as: console, browser, encap... but in R3.0 also things like Apache mod, IDE, enbedded, raw I/O, and others. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1509] | What can we say? It's the perception amongst developers. |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1510] | Yes, and I understand how you can draw that conclusion. |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1511x2] | How close is R3 anyway? Is it that close to replacing R2? |
A number of us have projects based upon statements made about the plugin. | |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1513x2] | No, it is not that close to R2 for several reasons.... which is also why I look for parallel projects related to it. |
In cases where development efforts for R2 also benefit R3, then we can do them now. That is the case of the Browser. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1515] | So, doesn't it make sense then to finish the plugin as it is so close? |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1516x5] | Yes, it does makes sense to do so. |
The first step in the plugin was to simply get it running again. | |
The next step was to get it to update properly, and while at it (and waiting on me) Josh did an amazing thing by making it deal with multiple instances. | |
So, what is important now is to build a list of shortcomings (e.g. security comes to mind), and prioritize. | |
We also value any inputs and contributions that can be provided by developers. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1521x2] | So, how much effort would it be to complete the plugin? A day, week, month? |
The current status is that all the demos on rebol.net don't work ... this is not a good advert. | |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1523] | We need a short list of "items" that define "complete". Once we have that, we can work toward making that happen. |
older newer | first last |