World: r3wp
[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server
older newer | first last |
Kaj 10-May-2011 [10535] | Doc, it works, with -vvvvvv and even when I've run it as root first. It can't create all its logs then, but at least it doesn't crash. Thanks again! |
Maxim 11-May-2011 [10536] | Doc, trying to start cheyenne on win7 with UAC enabled, I get this error message: You need administrator rights to switch to Windows Services mode ! thing is I've never tried to switch to windows Service mode!!! a part from the warning popping up the rebol console, the app seems to work ok. this is with all releases I've tried, including the v142 release. |
Dockimbel 11-May-2011 [10537] | the warning popping up the rebol console Are you running it from sources? |
Maxim 11-May-2011 [10538] | yes |
Dockimbel 11-May-2011 [10539] | Looking at the sources, I've found a code path leading to this error msg where the internal /quiet refinement is not honored. Fixing that. |
Maxim 11-May-2011 [10540] | stupid question, can the source version run as a service, or only the binary one? |
Dockimbel 11-May-2011 [10541x3] | IIRC, you can run it from sources too. Instead of putting cheyenne.exe as the service target, it will put rebol.exe. |
But you might have issues with paths. | |
Max: fix released. | |
Maxim 11-May-2011 [10544] | thks. |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10545x2] | 11/5-23:48:50.843304-[HTTPd] Trying phase url-to-filename ( mod-static ) 11/5-23:48:50.843599-## Error in [uniserve] : On-received call failed with error: make object! [ code: 312 type: 'script id: 'cannot-use arg1: 'path arg2: 'none! arg3: none near: [cfg/root-dir req/in/path req/in/target] where: 'rejoin ] ! any idea what can this be? im not sure how to interpret the error message |
(and why can't we see a line number for the error, btw?) | |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10547] | Is your configuration complete? Seems like it may be missing the root dir |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10548x3] | hm... i thought i wrote a message before the previous one or rather together with it... :/ or i just imagined... possible. i was tired. |
ah, i wrote it to my collegue then forgot to write here too | |
so the issue was: i had no default vhost defined and i was accessing a non-defined vhost. but kaj, how can u read what u've just said from this error message? those args are completely fucked up too. there is a lit-word of a datatype's name but without an exclamation mark, then comes none! as lit-word, then comes none as ... i don't know for sure, as a value? | |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10551] | It says cannot use path near cfg/root-dir, so that seems to me to mean that the configuration lacks a root-dir :-) |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10552] | >> cfg: none == none >> cfg/root-dir ** Script Error: Cannot use path on none! value ** Near: cfg/root-dir like this? |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10553] | Almost. cfg is probably defined, but not the root-dir in it |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10554x2] | >> cfg: [] == [] >> cfg/root-dir ** Script Error: Invalid path value: root-dir ** Near: cfg/root-dir |
it would be like this, wouldn't it? | |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10556] | Ah, maybe cfg is completely lacking, then |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10557] | but why am i not getting such a nice and descriptive error? btw, i was trying to catch this error, but no luck: >> e: catch [cfg/root-dir] ** Script Error: Invalid path value: root-dir ** Near: cfg/root-dir >> e: try [cfg/root-dir] ** Script Error: Invalid path value: root-dir ** Near: cfg/root-dir how can i get this as an error object, do i can explore? |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10558x2] | I think you're focusing too much on the details. I never noticed all those ' and ! :-) |
If you would FORM that error, it may be a bit more like English. Or at least in R3 | |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10560] | :) i've been told im too meticulous or what |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10561] | I notice that most programmers have a tendency to loose sight of the wood for the trees |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10562] | btw, the thing above worked. 'e got its value. i was just confused by the output. didn't know that an error! is displayed like that in the console |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10563] | It's a good skill to be able to sort out details. Most people can't. But you need to start with the overview to see the meaning and decide where to focus your efforts |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10564] | i think i have a better understanding of most of the things compared to my collegues, so i usually excel in debugging and i think i thank this ability of mine being curious about such details, so i can understand things a lot deeper than the average fellows |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10565] | Probably |
onetom 11-May-2011 [10566x2] | im just fucking curious, nah. can't help w that :) |
and thx for putting me on track :) | |
Kaj 11-May-2011 [10568x3] | Me too, but it's times like these that differences with other people's brains pop up that I can't really put my finger on, either :-) |
I always considered myself detail oriented, but there's still a difference with my peers | |
By the way, I also removed my default host, but I don't get errors when I go to localhost | |
Dockimbel 12-May-2011 [10571x3] | but why am i not getting such a nice and descriptive error? Because I am so used to read disarmed errors, that I don't require pretty printing them. I guess I should change that. |
I get an error when accessing a not defined vhost, but not the same as yours (it stops on missing 'default section here). | |
(and why can't we see a line number for the error, btw?) See my answer in ~Chit Chat group. | |
onetom 12-May-2011 [10574x2] | i was running on r136 when i got this error... |
13/5-8:10:46.9889960-[HTTPd] Connection closed 13/5-8:11:31.0776360-[HTTPd] Connection closed 13/5-8:12:11.7342000-[HTTPd] Connection closed 13/5-8:12:53.2066060-[HTTPd] Connection closed 13/5-8:13:33.7584240-[HTTPd] Connection closed 13/5-8:14:41.3166000-[HTTPd] Connection closed im seeing such messages on the cheyenne console in the past few hours. any idea what can it be? is it normal to have such a message every minute? | |
Maxim 12-May-2011 [10576] | probably when the keep alive is being released. |
onetom 12-May-2011 [10577x2] | but every minute for hours? im not getting any other messages... and actually - theoretically - there is no browser window open showing anything from the site this cheyenne is supposed to serve |
are http://localhost/docs/rfq/and http://localhost/docs/rfqconsidered the same resources? | |
Maxim 12-May-2011 [10579] | http://localhost/docs/rfqredirects to http://localhost/docs/rfq/ |
onetom 12-May-2011 [10580x3] | i was not talking about any specific implementation but about the theory of URIs / URLs |
of course in the context of apache and the context of mapping a filesystem to urls, i know it's the common practice | |
but should i give different results if it's a webservice? i had a use case for this ~2days ago, but i cant recall it atm | |
Maxim 12-May-2011 [10583] | the rfc doesn't say how URIs are supposed to be analysed. its up to each server to decide such issues. |
onetom 12-May-2011 [10584] | ah, versioning: GET obj -- would return the latest version GET obj/ -- would return the list of version ids GET obj/version -- would return that specific version |
older newer | first last |