World: r3wp
[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server
older newer | first last |
Henrik 7-Feb-2008 [2476x2] | After rebooting my OSX machine, Cheyenne doesn't work anymore. I didn't change anything. It starts and runs and launches its task handlers, but there is no access from a webbrowser. Does it create some kind of start up log so I can tell what's wrong? |
also it seems to launch two instances of itself. | |
btiffin 7-Feb-2008 [2478] | Firewall? non-persistent changes to ip tables can get ya. |
Henrik 7-Feb-2008 [2479] | firewall is inactive |
Graham 7-Feb-2008 [2480] | you can set the log to verbose |
Dockimbel 7-Feb-2008 [2481] | Do you launch Cheyenne with root privileges (for <1024 listen ports) ? Use this command line to debug : ./cheyenne -vvv |
Dockimbel 18-Feb-2008 [2482] | I'm planning a Cheyenne bugfix release tomorrow, if you've found some new bugs to fix, please report them in Cheyenne's bugtracker or post them here. Thanks. |
btiffin 18-Feb-2008 [2483] | Go Doc Go! Not a bug note or anything, but I'm becoming very intrigued by the potential of emedded Cheyenne. Go Doc Go! ;) |
Dockimbel 18-Feb-2008 [2484] | Did you played with the %embed-demo.r sample ? |
btiffin 18-Feb-2008 [2485] | Yep; and some. I have visions of suger plums dancing in my head. REBOL Website bundles. Transient home PC whiteboarding. Kick Cheyenne and dance with a browser, have your friends attach to the ip and then, after the fact close up shop. Zero-conf temporary web hosting, and the apps are pure REBOL scripts. Sweetness abounds. I think up new applications just about everytime I think about Cheyenne now. I was busy when you announced .9.16 so I didn't think deeply enough about it (I woohoo'ed, but thaty was it) It struck me like lightning the other day. I broke with tradition and dropped a note to Carl, I was so excited. GO DOC GO! :) |
Dockimbel 19-Feb-2008 [2486x2] | Cheyenne release v0.9.18 beta. Download at http://softinnov.org/tmp/cheyenne-r0918.zip |
This is a bugfix only release, it fix many bugs, especially the one introduced in the previous release causing an exit from the main event loop. See details in %changelog.txt. | |
Pekr 19-Feb-2008 [2488x2] | go Doc, go! :-) |
As this group might be followed by our French friends, I have one off-topic request ... if here is anyone from Paris area, I would like him to msg me privately. Our Company is opening subsidiary in Paris area, and I need to find local partner, who would eventually take care of some local IT related duties :-) | |
Dockimbel 19-Feb-2008 [2490] | Binaries for latest Cheyenne release available here : http://softinnov.org/cheyenne/blog.cgi?view=0017 |
Rod 19-Feb-2008 [2491] | Doc - think you need to check the Cheyenne blog rss setup, when I subscribed and followed a link it went 404 and pointed to the following. http://softinnov.org/article/0017.html rather than - http://softinnov.org/cheyenne/blog.cgi?view=0017 FYI, Rod. |
Dockimbel 20-Feb-2008 [2492x2] | Thanks, Rod, I'll fix that asap. |
RSS links fixed. | |
Rod 20-Feb-2008 [2494] | Looks good Doc, thanks. |
Will 12-Apr-2008 [2495] | running on great Cheyenne http://wrapr.org/ |
btiffin 13-Apr-2008 [2496] | Very nice Will. Highlighting that REBOL can do media ... proof in the pudding. |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2497] | That's great ! |
Will 13-Apr-2008 [2498x2] | Thanks 8) |
but that is mostly ajax, and load is put on the flickr api.. now for something that really use Cheyenne rsp power, check this http://beta.arounder.com/amsterdam/city_tour/van_gogh_museum_01.html click on the "read" tab, there is a little number in gray, that is page generation time, then reload the same page and check again, it use a uniserve/service memcache, also conside that it's on a multilanguage framework 8) | |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2500] | Btw, just as teaser, Cheyenne will soon have its own dedicated website with documentation and a roadmap for all planned features in future versions..among them, there's a new server-side framework providing 100% separation between HTML and processing code. Petr, you gonna love it ;-) |
Graham 13-Apr-2008 [2501x2] | will we have much of a rewrite of existing apps? |
Built in LNS server support? | |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2503] | RSP framework will stay and will be improved. The new framework "X" will be an addition, so you will always have the choice to use whatever framework suits best your needs : CGI, RSP, "X", QM, or FastCGI engines (like PHP). |
Henrik 13-Apr-2008 [2504] | dockimbel, I'm using RSP for the forum and it's working great so far. no problems. |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2505] | LNS or something similar, definitely. I would like something "lighter" if possible, than RT's LNS focused on speed and security. |
Henrik 13-Apr-2008 [2506x2] | with RSP, would there be an option to only run .rsp files and not .r? if I want to serve .rsp pages and allow downloading of .r scripts? |
i.e. when the user asks for .r files, not when another .rsp page wants to include them | |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2508x2] | Sure, It's just a matter of configuration in %httpd.cfg file. |
Just remove .r from this line : bind-extern CGI to [.cgi .r], and .r file will be served as static files. | |
Henrik 13-Apr-2008 [2510] | thanks |
amacleod 13-Apr-2008 [2511] | What is the advantage of "x" framework? What kind of stuff does it enable us to do? |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2512x3] | The main feature has been already exposed above : clean and complete separation between HTML and REBOL code. |
I would also like to add AJAX and DB abstraction layer, but I didn't yet decided what approach would fit the best with REBOL. It needs a lot of experimenting first. | |
My desire is to integrate the best features found around in other web frameworks, but in the most efficient way (simple, fast and lightweight). | |
amacleod 13-Apr-2008 [2515] | clean and complete separation between HTML and REBOL code So you are not mixing rebol code with html in one file? (like in RSP) But your building web pages using rebol code alone? Is the server acting like a serverside "plug-In"? Sorry if I sound completley novice. |
Henrik 13-Apr-2008 [2516] | hmmm... I'm building a dialect that builds HTML code, in a sense, weeding out the need for HTML code inside the rebol code. is that what "x" does? |
amacleod 13-Apr-2008 [2517] | Henrik, I like that idea. Is that what Magic! does somewhat. I know in the docs there seem to be widgets. |
Pekr 13-Apr-2008 [2518x3] | magic is not there imo |
Doc - sounds cool! | |
Henrik - what he meant was to use some other means of tagging imo. Simply no combination of REBOL and html code. That aproach ala PHP is total crap | |
amacleod 13-Apr-2008 [2521x2] | Pekr, "not there". You mean just not powerful or useful enough? |
I've tried to get it up and running (Magic!) but have never got it to work. Apachi always gives me a hard time. Since its CGI based I tried with Cheyenne but again unsuccessful. | |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2523] | The new framework will still use HTML for UI but without mixing it with REBOL code. |
BrianH 13-Apr-2008 [2524] | Doc, if you have specific complaints about LNS, please chime in - I am looking over the code now. |
Dockimbel 13-Apr-2008 [2525] | HTML templates will be static files and some advanced widgets (like those AJAX-based) may be generated dynamically. |
older newer | first last |