World: r3wp
[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server
older newer | first last |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [288] | Oldes: thanks for the offer of help cgi mode with remark. Anytime you want, just ping me and we can see what needs too be done to make it happen. |
Rebolek 22-Feb-2007 [289] | maxim: why do you think nobody's reading it? because your web's bandwith wasn't wasted in ten minutes and there are no ecstatic reactions? ;) |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [290] | hahaha, I don't expect to change the world... just that my announce didn't even generate one sign or having been read... so I wonder sometimes, if most of you use the custom dividers or are like me and just the "all groups" master didivers and clear them as they are filled. |
Rebolek 22-Feb-2007 [291] | actually I've read it, but have no time right now to try it. I'm still looking for some web managment so I can rework my web, but the time...that's the problem :) I'm using just "all groups" and check red groups for anything interesting :) |
Henrik 22-Feb-2007 [292] | eeks, I hope my product isn't in direct competition with maxims... :-) |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [293x2] | hehe I read about it.. I think you could generate your app within mine. |
but not the opposite. | |
Henrik 22-Feb-2007 [295x2] | that is probably true. however I may change the architecture a bit since the parser is limited to two levels and is not recursive. the pages are generated from a limited list. all I really wanted to do was to make it easy to combine blogger.r, makedoc documents, dir listings and customized html output in a pipeline. it does most of that now, but the parser is only about 80% elegant. :-) |
but I love the speed. comparing it to rapidweaver, it's crazy fast. it's webserver independent as well. | |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [297x2] | I put 0% of time on site layout, once its done. I just edit content and make the page. its like editing make doc, but in html format... also, the tags are not standard html type tags they nest directely <p! text <b! is bold <i! and italic>>> |
easier to edit, since I don't have to track the damned end tag all the time... this being said, normal html is still valid within the files... so its a 1/2 way between html and rebol code. | |
Graham 22-Feb-2007 [299] | Max, can you elaborate on using Apache ssl with Cheyenne ? |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [300x3] | I did so for my own server, which is an http web service: |
you install and setup an apache server which has ssl, reverse proxy, and redirection modules enabled. | |
then you accept the connections from the ssl port (apache silently handles the decryption) and redirect all traffic to your cheyenne server. | |
Graham 22-Feb-2007 [303] | are these automatically installed? |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [304x3] | they are all part of the standard apache distro... but you have so edit the config file to enable them |
I am not an apache expert, I had the setups done for me, but it works out :-) | |
the setups where very basic though... 4-5 lines, basically setting up the ports, and urls ... not much wizardry. | |
Graham 22-Feb-2007 [307] | Ok. I've already downloaded this vmware ssl appliance ... but good to know now. |
Maxim 22-Feb-2007 [308] | using the dynamic linking, means you don't have to understand the apache compilation part... so its pretty easy to setup. |
Terry 23-Feb-2007 [309] | Apache to run Cheyenne? Odd. |
Maxim 23-Feb-2007 [310x2] | i'd rather say apache is just a slave in this setup |
it just acts as a signal converter | |
Terry 24-Feb-2007 [312] | Ok here's a riddle.. When is a slave a master? |
Maarten 24-Feb-2007 [313] | When he reaches Zen |
Gregg 24-Feb-2007 [314] | When he's a middle manager? |
Dockimbel 25-Feb-2007 [315x2] | Graham: you should look at http://www.stunnel.org/to add SSL support to Cheyenne. |
It's a command-line tool acting as a SSL daemon frontend for any server requiring SSL decryption. | |
Graham 25-Feb-2007 [317] | I had a go .. but couldn't get it to work. |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [318] | I just intalled the windows version, it works very well. I just had to edit the stunnel.conf file to uncomment the HTTPS config options. |
Graham 26-Feb-2007 [319] | Ok, I might have to have another attempt. |
Oldes 26-Feb-2007 [320x2] | yes... must agree with Doc. It's very easy, just download the latest precompiled version (I have 4.20) install, uncomment the https as doc said and than do: stunnel.exe -install to install it as service.. and: stunnel.exe -start to start it. |
What I would like to know, is if I can use it to get https urls from Rebol, not just to encrypt my server? | |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [322] | Didn't tried that, but there's a client mode in stunnel. |
Graham 26-Feb-2007 [323x2] | Is this what you did ? http://www.stunnel.org/examples/https_windows.html |
which is what I tried last year and could not get working. | |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [325x3] | That's the hard way ! :-) |
Just download and install the precompiled version : http://www.stunnel.org/download/stunnel/win32/stunnel-4.20-installer.exe | |
Then Start => Programs => STunnel => Edit stunnel.conf : uncomment the [https] section, then save it. | |
Graham 26-Feb-2007 [328] | Wow .. so easy? |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [329] | Then STunnel => Run STunnel ...and that's all. Takes 2 mn, including the download time. |
Graham 26-Feb-2007 [330] | Ok. Definitely will try it .. why do they have a how to that's so difficult ?? |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [331] | They did a good job with stunnel's installer, fast and easy to use. |
Graham 26-Feb-2007 [332] | What bug database are you using now? |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [333] | The How-To you point us at, is only useful if you want to compile stunnel sources for the windows version instead of downloading the precompiled binary. |
Graham 26-Feb-2007 [334] | You said that Mantis was much better than Trac :) |
Dockimbel 26-Feb-2007 [335x3] | Better : sure, reliable : I'm not that sure. |
Anyway, I'm going to make a Mantis lightweight clone soon, when the new Cheyenne version will be ready. | |
That would make a good test application for the new RSP session engine. | |
older newer | first last |