r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server

Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[288]
Oldes: thanks for the offer of help cgi mode with remark.  Anytime 
you want, just ping me and we can see what needs too be done to make 
it happen.
Rebolek
22-Feb-2007
[289]
maxim: why do you think nobody's reading it? because your web's bandwith 
wasn't wasted in ten minutes and there are no ecstatic reactions? 
;)
Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[290]
hahaha, I don't expect to change the world... just that my announce 
didn't even generate one sign or having been read... so I wonder 
sometimes, if most of you use the custom dividers or are like me 
and just the "all groups" master didivers and clear them as they 
 are filled.
Rebolek
22-Feb-2007
[291]
actually I've read it, but have no time right now to try it. I'm 
still looking for some web managment so I can rework my web, but 
the time...that's the problem :) I'm using just "all groups" and 
check red groups for anything interesting :)
Henrik
22-Feb-2007
[292]
eeks, I hope my product isn't in direct competition with maxims... 
:-)
Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[293x2]
hehe I read about it.. I think you could generate your app within 
mine.
but not the opposite.
Henrik
22-Feb-2007
[295x2]
that is probably true. however I may change the architecture a bit 
since the parser is limited to two levels and is not recursive. the 
pages are generated from a limited list. all I really wanted to do 
was to make it easy to combine blogger.r, makedoc documents, dir 
listings and customized html output in a pipeline. it does most of 
that now, but the parser is only about 80% elegant. :-)
but I love the speed. comparing it to rapidweaver, it's crazy fast. 
it's webserver independent as well.
Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[297x2]
I put 0% of time on site layout, once its done.  I just edit content 
and make the page.  its like editing make doc, but in html format... 
also, the tags are not standard html type tags  they nest directely 
 <p! text <b! is bold <i! and italic>>>
easier to edit, since I don't have to track the damned end tag all 
the time... this being said, normal html is still valid within the 
files... so its a 1/2 way between html and rebol code.
Graham
22-Feb-2007
[299]
Max, can you elaborate on using Apache ssl with Cheyenne ?
Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[300x3]
I did so for my own server, which is an http web service:
you install and setup an apache server which has ssl, reverse proxy, 
and redirection modules enabled.
then you accept the connections from the ssl port (apache silently 
handles the decryption) and redirect all traffic to your cheyenne 
server.
Graham
22-Feb-2007
[303]
are these automatically installed?
Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[304x3]
they are all part of the standard apache distro... but you have so 
edit the config file to enable them
I am not an apache expert, I had the setups done for me, but it works 
out  :-)
the setups where very basic though... 4-5 lines, basically setting 
up the ports, and urls ... not much wizardry.
Graham
22-Feb-2007
[307]
Ok.  I've already downloaded this vmware ssl appliance ... but good 
to know now.
Maxim
22-Feb-2007
[308]
using the dynamic linking, means you don't have to understand the 
apache compilation part... so its pretty easy to setup.
Terry
23-Feb-2007
[309]
Apache to run Cheyenne? Odd.
Maxim
23-Feb-2007
[310x2]
i'd rather say apache is just a slave in this setup
it just acts as a signal converter
Terry
24-Feb-2007
[312]
Ok here's a riddle..  When is a slave a master?
Maarten
24-Feb-2007
[313]
When he reaches Zen
Gregg
24-Feb-2007
[314]
When he's a middle manager?
Dockimbel
25-Feb-2007
[315x2]
Graham: you should look at http://www.stunnel.org/to add SSL support 
to Cheyenne.
It's a command-line tool acting as a SSL daemon frontend for any 
server requiring SSL decryption.
Graham
25-Feb-2007
[317]
I had a go .. but couldn't get it to work.
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[318]
I just intalled the windows version, it works very well. I just had 
to edit the stunnel.conf file to uncomment the HTTPS config options.
Graham
26-Feb-2007
[319]
Ok, I might have to have another attempt.
Oldes
26-Feb-2007
[320x2]
yes... must agree with Doc. It's very easy, just download the latest 
precompiled version (I have 4.20) install, uncomment the https as 
doc said and than do:
      stunnel.exe -install
to install it as service.. and:
      stunnel.exe -start
to start it.
What I would like to know, is if I can use it to get https urls from 
Rebol, not just to encrypt my server?
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[322]
Didn't tried that, but there's a client mode in stunnel.
Graham
26-Feb-2007
[323x2]
Is this what you did ?  http://www.stunnel.org/examples/https_windows.html
which is what I tried last year and could not get working.
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[325x3]
That's the hard way ! :-)
Just download and install the precompiled version : http://www.stunnel.org/download/stunnel/win32/stunnel-4.20-installer.exe
Then Start => Programs => STunnel => Edit stunnel.conf : uncomment 
the [https] section, then save it.
Graham
26-Feb-2007
[328]
Wow .. so easy?
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[329]
Then STunnel => Run STunnel ...and that's all. Takes 2 mn, including 
the download time.
Graham
26-Feb-2007
[330]
Ok. Definitely will try it .. why do they have a how to that's so 
difficult ??
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[331]
They did a good job with stunnel's installer, fast and easy to use.
Graham
26-Feb-2007
[332]
What bug database are you using now?
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[333]
The How-To you point us at, is only useful if you want to compile 
stunnel sources for the windows version instead of downloading the 
precompiled binary.
Graham
26-Feb-2007
[334]
You said that Mantis was much better than Trac :)
Dockimbel
26-Feb-2007
[335x3]
Better : sure, reliable : I'm not that sure.
Anyway, I'm going to make a Mantis lightweight clone soon, when the 
new Cheyenne version will be ready.
That would make a good test application for the new RSP session engine.