r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server

Graham
29-Nov-2008
[3452]
It's the version from your site.
Dockimbel
30-Nov-2008
[3453x3]
Here's my latest beta version encapped for Linux libc6 : http://cheyenne-server.org/tmp/cheyenne.tar.gz
Try it, but watch out for webapps sandboxing.
Archive just re-released with several minor fixes. Here's the changelog 
for all fixes in this new beta 0.9.19 : 

	o RSP: fixed an issue with DB cached queries synchronization.
	

 o RSP: after a request, response's buffer is now correctly reset 
 to the default buffer.
	  

 o Mod-static: fixed badly formed redirection URL when parameters 
 are present (thanks to Will).
	

 o Bug fixed in request internal forwarding clean-up code (thanks 
 to Will).
	

 o RSP: fixed an issue with localization directories having the same 
 path in different webapps (thanks to Will).
Source package is available at : http://cheyenne-server.org/tmp/cheyenne-r0919.zip
DideC
1-Dec-2008
[3456]
No encapped version ?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3457]
see two messages above
DideC
1-Dec-2008
[3458]
I mean, Windows one, not linux.
Dockimbel
1-Dec-2008
[3459x2]
It's just a test release for users having online servers having some 
troubles with RSP. This release doesn't fix anything specifically 
related to that (maybe fix #2 may help?), it's for these users to 
upgrade their servers to the latest release (some are still running 
on 0.9.18).
The "RSP stop responding" issue is a complex issue. It doesn't seem 
related to a simple bug in RSP, it looks like it's caused by some 
user script errors that aren't caught correctly by the RSP engine. 
There's some holes in error logging in RSP, I'll work on that to 
improve the logging system in RSP asap.


I've experienced the "RSP stop responding" issue with 0.9.18, but 
never with the latest version. Will reported me that this issue occured 
several times for him recently with 0.9.19, but it seemed related 
to user script error (?).
DideC
1-Dec-2008
[3461]
OK
You said "15-november" :

Okay, my READ-IO emulation has been removed in the last version. 
I've replaced it with a safe 'cgi-read-io function. I plan to put 
it back soon, I think I know how to make it work reliably now.


I need a cheyenne.exe with this done. Is there one somewhere or do 
you need to build it ?
Dockimbel
1-Dec-2008
[3462]
Did you tried by just replacing the READ-IO occurences in your CGI 
with CGI-READ-IO to see if that fixes the problem ?
DideC
1-Dec-2008
[3463]
Ah, didn't understand that it was me that must put CGI-READ-IO in 
my script !
Dockimbel
1-Dec-2008
[3464]
That was one of the options, the other is me writing a good READ-IO 
emulation for CGI (that won't happen soon...lack of time).
Ashley
1-Dec-2008
[3465]
Assuming my ISP is running Linux, what do I have to get them to do 
to be able to run Cheyenne? (if this is all doc'ed, just point me 
to the URL ... thanks).
AdrianS
1-Dec-2008
[3466]
don't many ISPs allow you to get a full VM configured as you like?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3467x3]
Ashley .. most ISPs won't allow you to run a daemon
but all you need is the cheyenne distro, and rebol.
You can setup your own vm for $20 / month on slicehost.com
AdrianS
1-Dec-2008
[3470]
Are you using them Graham?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3471x2]
No ... I'm not,  But they're cheaper than my current host which I 
have had for 16 years now!
So, I'm looking to change.
Henrik
1-Dec-2008
[3473]
any good words about them?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3474x2]
They get very good reviews
on tech forums
Henrik
1-Dec-2008
[3476]
interesting
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3477]
They were recently bought out by rackspace ... so we will see if 
that changes anything.
Henrik
1-Dec-2008
[3478]
I would like to hear more if someone gets to use Cheyenne on them. 
(as I deeply miss a high bandwidth, high uptime Cheyenne host).
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3479x2]
maybe if we all contribute a few $$ each , we can get a slice we 
can all share for REbol scripts
have Cheyenne ... and each person runs their own vhosts
AdrianS
1-Dec-2008
[3481]
I'd chip in
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3482x3]
That will stress doc out!! LOL
I'm up for $20
We can now run it for 2 months!
Henrik
1-Dec-2008
[3485]
Did Carl see it when it was discussed to change host?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3486x4]
Richard offered a free host .. so it was not discussed.  however 
Richard has now gone awol
If I can get 12 people .. viz. a year .. I'll start the process of 
ordering a slice.
I'm going to suggest ubuntun server as the OS.
Ubuntu
Henrik
1-Dec-2008
[3490]
At that price, it seems like a steal. The question down the road 
is, who is stealing from who. :-)
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3491x2]
Well, we could use EC2 ... but that's $70/month
we would have to have someone who is very intimate wth Cheyenne to 
run the Cheyenne side.
Ashley
1-Dec-2008
[3493]
All my stuff is hosted on http://www.webarama.com.au/and they've 
been pretty amenable to my other requests. Is it just a case of getting 
them to "install" REBOL for me much as Perl is? If so, which version 
of REBOL do I need? Can I get away with /base?
AdrianS
1-Dec-2008
[3494]
what about a DB?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3495]
core ... and just place it in /bin directory
AdrianS
1-Dec-2008
[3496]
the $20 slice includes just 256MB of RAM
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3497]
256mb is heaps
AdrianS
1-Dec-2008
[3498]
for DB too?
Graham
1-Dec-2008
[3499x3]
sure ...
we can easily apt-get mysql
what were you thinking of running?