r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server

Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5940]
No rush ...
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5941x2]
I need it to be fully operationnal for tomorrow, we're starting UAT 
for a customer app relying on it. ;-)
Correcting myself about my claim regarding CRLF not sent by REBOL 
built-in protocols : REBOL does send CRLF even if 'newline if used 
as line terminator. A conversion is applied and it becomes CRLF once 
inserted in the port. This automatic conversion (LF=>CRLF) is OS 
independent and is triggered by /lines refinement used on OPEN native 
in root-protocol/open-proto. AFAICT, this behaviour is not documented 
explicitely anywhere. I can just find a few mentions about such conversion 
here : http://www.rebol.com/docs/core23/rebolcore-12.html, but it 
looks like it's related to FTP scheme only (while in fact being the 
default for all schemes relying on OPEN-PROTO).
Maxim
20-Sep-2009
[5943x2]
yess.  I've had to battle this in the past when its not desired.
I wonder if the /lines is a recent refinement or if I just never 
noticed it.
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5945x2]
IIRC, it's here, at least, since v2.0.
here=>there
Maxim
20-Sep-2009
[5947]
darn, a single little thing goes unnoticed and this ends up causing 
so much grief!!  :-)
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5948]
bad side of working with black boxes...
Maxim
20-Sep-2009
[5949x3]
<sigh!>  I wish I'd known about /lines hehe... I had to go through 
countless hours trying to fix the headers and when doing multipart... 
god... it was horrible to fix.  ;-)
I ended working in binary mode exclusive, this way I could at least 
get precise lenghts... which didn't change halfway through the process 
 ;-)
exclusively.
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5952x2]
most rfcs of that time user crlf
Well, as soon as it is updated ... I'll be ready to test the MTA.
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5954]
SVN r21 :


FEAT: log verbosity handling refactored, now more consistent across 
modules

FIX: email.r lib doesn't interfere anymore with other Rebol built-in 
schemes
FIX: bug in multipart/form-data decoding in RSP.r
FIX: email.rsp demo script now handles attached file correctly
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5955x2]
wow that was quick!
and the windows 7 issue?
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5957x4]
Couldn't access my Win7 box, so could test it. I'll be able to do 
that only tomorrow.
If you're still having issues with the MTA, please active maximum 
log level : -vvvvv and send me the output on private channel or by 
email.
so could (not) test it...
Did encapping solved your DNS lock up issue on Win7?
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5961x3]
Yes... but now the new encapped version won't run.
Hmm... will do another svn up
try source version...
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5964x2]
Testing from fresh checkout : error popping up at start
Fixed in SVN r22, please update.
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5966]
win-get-dns: does [ return 208.67.222.222 ]
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5967]
So, you have to hardcod the DNS server IP address?
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5968x7]
to run as source ...
ending progress: [error [compkarori-:-gmail-:-com] {421 4.4.5 Server busy, 
try again later. 8si31346080pzk.8^M }]
sending ..
let me try my own dns
nope... not working.  just says pending.
oh ... ok.  got something back!  :(
someone doesn't like me ... ...sending progress: [error [compkarori-:-gmail-:-com] 
{421-4.7.0 [203.97.98.9] Our system has detected an unusual amount 
of unsolicited^M }]
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5975]
421 code might be used for greylisting...
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5976]
Ok, sent to myself .. and worked.
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5977]
After reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting, I'm think 
that I really need to support that feature.
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5978x4]
ie. my own domain .. so it looks like gmail now has greylisting
BTW, in Chrome the attachfield does not show up.
Doesn't like me using 209.85.222.8 ( read dns://gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 
)
just get pending ...
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5982]
I see the name of attached file once pick up using Chrome 3.0/Vista.
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5983x2]
oh .. so you need to select a file first to see the field?
Interesting .. didn't know Chrome was that smart.
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5985]
I'm in transition from IE8 to Chrome...still lacking some features 
of the google bar (which doesn't yet exists for Chrome!).
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5986x2]
can we log the entire smtp transaction so that we can see what the 
issues are?
I've only managed to send 1/10 emails so far.
Dockimbel
20-Sep-2009
[5988]
it would need some additional log/info lines in MTA.r to follow the 
whole exchange. If you have wireshark installed, it will be quicker.
Graham
20-Sep-2009
[5989]
ok.  I'll fire up wireshark.  But my users won't be able to do that.