World: r3wp

I've tried everything.. now im using the  FQDN including port :82

Can you show me the URL?

Do you change the hostname dynamically in the ws URL or is it static?

static

it's in your user group

if it's static, then it can work only for the URL you've written, 
so from the server itself, the URL might be invalid

I mean, if you've used something like ws://intranet/app.rsp and ws://intranet 
is not resolved on your server, that's would be the cause of your 
issue

from the server, i cant' get a message to on-message .. but from 
the other client, I can.. only it won't reply.

Terry: just replace ws:// by http:// and test the URL from rebol 
console with a READ (from your server box)

(or from a ws-enabled browser from your server box)

hmm.. how about this.. when i close Cheyenne, the messages are sent 
back to the browser..AFTER it closes

if it works on port 80 and not 82, the issue is probably not Cheyenne-related

The port 80 vs 82 was a guess.

One of the problems is debugging this stuff in Chrome... not sure 
how to watch the traffic.. need some network sniffing tools i suppose.

doc, is curecode still under active development ?  Is there a release 
1 on the horizon?

The exact same code is working fine on another server.. move to here 
and *poof*

Is windows 7 your target platform?

I use 'em all baby.. I .. use .. them... all.

well, except for Mac

Apple had their chance back in the early 80's.. back then you had 
a choice, forfeit the downpayment on a house and buy a Mac, or get 
a clone.

Graham, curecode development is currently on hold, as all my REBOL 
related projects (except Cheyenne for bugfixing and minor improvements)

That's what I feared ...

So, is there going to be a groovy version??

Or is it Scala ?

hehe, probably not groovy, I didn't yet choose my next programming 
language...JS is currently my favorite for frontends thought.

Scala: too many java dependencies, so not for me.

I tried to install Jira .. but it no longer supports Firebird so 
I was looking for something else

I'm still wondering if I should build my own language (probably REBOL-derivated) 
or dive in a mainstream one...

Well, Jira works fine under Windows .. but Linux requires more knowledge

Well, there's Karl's clone ...

I've heard good things from Jira's users

and of course there's freebell ...

ahh.. ok.. working now

Graham, yes I know that project, but I have my own unreleased prototype 
clone kernels (at least one is more advanced than Boron or Orca)

Looks like Frank did a lot of work on Freebell ..

trying to hammer this out, i fixed the original problem, but introduced 
other bugs.

Freebell is just a proof of concept

something that runs on the JVM would be great ...

(a good working one, Frank did a good job)

this stuff needs some debugging tools

Graham: the jvm is just a target like .net or any cpu...

however, still not working from host.. prob a windows 7 hostname 
thing.

sure .. a virtual cpu

Terry, try to debug from the rebol console if possible

Graham: what's stopping me to work on such clone project is just 
the business model, hard to earn money from that...

sure .. no $ in languages .. Carl has proved that

But it's the long term security of having your own custom environment 
I guess

derivated products like an IDE could be sold, but it will be hard 
to compete with zillions of other programming languages anyway...

or we could start a bounty for rebol on the JVM :)

Doc, it's the same prob.. disconnecting at the client .. Cheyenne 
isn't even aware of the disconnection.