World: r3wp
[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server
older newer | first last |
GrahamC 18-Dec-2010 [9401x4] | True and that uses Apache |
This is the app I'm working on to deploy nationwide ( small nation though :) ) https://nzra.cloud-ehr.net/ | |
There's a Guest account | |
Now if a certain big pharma company goes ahead to pay for this as they have said .. I'll put "powered by Rebol" banners everywhere :) | |
nve 18-Dec-2010 [9405] | And Powered by Cheyenne banner ! |
GrahamC 18-Dec-2010 [9406] | that's already ther e... |
nve 18-Dec-2010 [9407x2] | everywhere ! |
;-) | |
Kaj 18-Dec-2010 [9409] | RSP is a template system. Magic! generates pages from REBOL dialects |
Dockimbel 19-Dec-2010 [9410] | Graham, if you're concerned about performances and scalability, I don't understand why you're considering a CGI-based solution? AFAICT, Cheyenne/RSP is the most scalable solution for running REBOL code on server-side. If a single Cheyenne instance is not enough, you can use a nginx front-end to server static content and dispatch the load over several Cheyenne instances. Our biggest online web-app has ~800 users, with several hundreds logging in each day, accessing a 400MB RDBMS with millions of records served by a single Cheyenne instance, with 8 workers (each taking 15 to 25MB of RAM) running on a 2.2Ghz DualCore CPU with 2GB of RAM. Average Cheyenne load is 2 req/s with peaks up to 100 req/s (usually caused by web scanners or attacks). The webapp is still performing well under these conditions, and we have plenty of space to improve performances when it will be required (with faster hw and more instances). Also, a key factor is optimizing webapp's code, especially for the most used RSP pages. Btw, a profiler would be a good addition to Cheyenne/RSP framework. |
Kaj 19-Dec-2010 [9411] | Cool |
nve 19-Dec-2010 [9412] | Great, I was sure that Cheyenne can do it ! |
GrahamC 19-Dec-2010 [9413x2] | Doc, it wasn't me .. it was these other guys who wanted to use this thing I'm writing where they don't have the option of installing Cheyenne. |
They also asked me to port to python and php ... lol | |
Kaj 20-Dec-2010 [9415] | One version in Python and one version in PHP? |
GrahamC 20-Dec-2010 [9416] | I guess so ... |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [9417x2] | Given this JS if ( bValid ) { var dataString = 'pain=' + pain + '&ptgl=' + gs + '&fn=' + fn + '&rapid3=' + rapid3 + '&fatigue=' + fatigue + '&ros=' + ros + '&ems=' + ems + '&patient=' + '<%=patient%>' ; //alert (dataString);return false; $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "add-rapid3.rsp", data: dataString, success: function() { // removed ... } }); return false; //$( this ).dialog( "close" ); } }, what would cause this? 28/12-23:58:37.055-[DEBUG] c: [pain "[object Object]" ptgl "[object Object]" fn "[object Object]" rapid3 "[object Object]" fatigue "[object Object]" ros "[object HTMLInputElement]" ems "[object Object]" patient "7"] where the add-rapid3.rsp is <% ; add-rapid3.rsp c: request/content ?? c exit %> |
guess my javascript is screwed somewhere ... | |
PeterWood 29-Dec-2010 [9419x3] | This is a result of not overriding the default toString() method in your pain, gs, fn, rapid3, fatigue, ros and ems objects. |
..but I'm surprised that they are trying to use objects in such a way. | |
they -> you | |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [9422] | I'm just copying code from JS samples :( |
PeterWood 29-Dec-2010 [9423x2] | If you can send me the sample, I'll try to take a look for you later on. |
... or your full code... | |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [9425x7] | ahh.. .changing this to pain.val() works |
Thanks for the clue | |
this is frustrating ... | |
This is my target script add-rapid3.rsp <% context [ d: now ; convert to gmt, and then to NZ time d: d - d/zone + localzone ?? d ; add-rapid3.rsp c: request/content ; c: [pain "3" ptgl "4" fn "2" rapid3 "5" fatigue "9" ros "6" ems "7" patient "7"] ?? c patient: select c 'patient pain: min 10 to-decimal select c 'pain fn: min 10 to-decimal select c 'fn ptgl: min 10 to-decimal select c 'ptgl ros: min 60 to-decimal select c 'ros fatigue: min 10 to-decimal select c 'fatigue ems: min 360 to-integer select c 'ems result: make object! [ patient: (patient) pain: (pain) fn: (fn) ptgl: (ptgl) ros: (ros) fatigue: (fatigue) ems: (ems) ] ?? result ] %> and the c is the dump from ?? | |
and I'm getting this error in trace.log 9/12-01:14:18.696-[DEBUG] c: [pain "9" ptgl "8" fn "10" rapid3 "7" fatigue "4" ros "6" ems "5" patient "7"] 29/12-01:14:18.696-[RSP] ##RSP Script Error: URL = /md/add-rapid3.rsp File = /r/pwp/www/md/add-rapid3.rsp ** Script Error : patient has no value ** Where: context ** Near: [patient] | |
crap .. need a compose | |
the only reason I created the object is that if I used 5 ?? consecutively, I get no output after the 4th ?? ... bizarred | |
Kaj 29-Dec-2010 [9432] | Can you please do this in the JavaScript group? |
MikeL 3-Jan-2011 [9433] | In the "I hope this group thinks there are no stupid questions" mode, if I get new View 2.7.8.3.1 from 1-Jan-2011, how do I run that with Cheyenne? I tried an .rsp with Funct and it flunks. So my Cheyenne version (a win exe) is not using new R2. |
BrianH 3-Jan-2011 [9434] | 2.7.7 has FUNCT too, so what you have is a 2.7.6 build. |
GrahamC 3-Jan-2011 [9435x3] | doc is not using an encapper higher than 2.7.6 |
So, you need to run the source code versions of Cheyenne | |
Or, you can include the r2/forward package in your RSP pages | |
BrianH 3-Jan-2011 [9438] | Since many of the 2.7.8 native fixes were done for Doc, perhaps he will do new encaps. |
Dockimbel 3-Jan-2011 [9439x2] | I haven't used 2.7.7 due to a few issues that made it look less stable than 2.7.6. I can't afford to use a new version with regressions. Hopefully, SDK 2.7.8 looks more polished and it runs Cheyenne flawlessly on Linux platform. If the Windows SDK is ok too, I'll upgrade my Cheyenne build chain to 2.7.8. |
MikeL: - Download Cheyenne revision 122 source package from here: http://cheyenne-server.org/download.shtml - Open a 2.7.8 console - Type: >> cd %<path-to-cheyenne-folder> >> do %cheyenne.r | |
MikeL 3-Jan-2011 [9441] | Thanks I had tried that combination a little earlier and after running in Windows Auth mode, I get "Can not open server Rconsole on port 9801" and "Can not open server Logger on port 9802" as Uniserve errors. |
GrahamC 3-Jan-2011 [9442x2] | and are those ports already open? |
Does Rebol need to be run as admin? Is your firewall blocking these ports? | |
MikeL 4-Jan-2011 [9444] | Thanks Graham. For some corporate machine, changing the firewall settings won't be an option. I ran R2 as admin and gave R2 access to everything. No change. 9801 and 9802 are not recorded as blocked for any programs on McAfee inbound or outbound events. |
Oldes 4-Jan-2011 [9445x2] | Cheyenne is working fine from sources with 2.7.8 (XP)... Check what is using the port. You can use for example PortQry util: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832919 Which can show you something like that: ... Process ID: 1376 (rebol-view-278-3-1.exe) Process doesn't appear to be a service PID Port Local IP State Remote IP:Port 1376 TCP 8080 0.0.0.0 LISTENING 0.0.0.0:22712 1376 TCP 9799 0.0.0.0 LISTENING 0.0.0.0:41163 1376 TCP 9801 0.0.0.0 LISTENING 0.0.0.0:43253 1376 TCP 9802 0.0.0.0 LISTENING 0.0.0.0:22573 1376 TCP 9803 0.0.0.0 LISTENING 0.0.0.0:40994 1376 TCP 9799 127.0.0.1 ESTABLISHED 127.0.0.1:1116 1376 TCP 9799 127.0.0.1 ESTABLISHED 127.0.0.1:1117 1376 TCP 9799 127.0.0.1 ESTABLISHED 127.0.0.1:1118 1376 TCP 9799 127.0.0.1 ESTABLISHED 127.0.0.1:1119 |
This tools is maybe better http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897437 as it has gui as well | |
Cyphre 4-Jan-2011 [9447] | You don't need any special tool for port checking in winXP...just use the console NETSTAT command. |
MikeL 4-Jan-2011 [9448] | Thanks. I am run Windows 7 and ran NetStat as Admin. Some 9799 and other ports in use but no 9801 and 9802. Trying TcpView. |
Oldes 4-Jan-2011 [9449] | Netstat does not display which process is using the port, does it? |
Cyphre 4-Jan-2011 [9450] | Oldes, use netstat /? to get all the options...I guess -o is what you need. |
older newer | first last |