World: r3wp
[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server
older newer | first last |
Maxim 17-Apr-2011 [9796] | or then... what is "this case" I'm obviously missing something here :-) |
Dockimbel 17-Apr-2011 [9797x2] | nope, see the piratepad link from onetom, we were talking about relocating the whole Cheyenne working folder. |
Dinner time here... | |
Maxim 17-Apr-2011 [9799] | ahh. k. |
onetom 17-Apr-2011 [9800x5] | were we talking about such things? really? :D |
this mod-userdir name is a bit misleading, i think. i was expecting some handler for the /~user/ pathes and the ability to automatically fire up workers with the right ownership based on the owner of the directory it's serving from | |
however, since the source version runs again with /core, i can hack whatever i want now | |
i just need the logs go out of the way in a binary version | |
in the binary versions | |
Maxim 17-Apr-2011 [9805x2] | Doc, is it safe to do this: req/in: make req/in [ data: value ] within any/all of the module phases? |
safe in the sense that some code in uniserve/cheyenne might have an absolute reference to the req/in... and this could break the chain of command.. | |
Dockimbel 17-Apr-2011 [9807] | I think that it is safe, but you should test if Cheyenne still works correctly after such change anyway (too bad we don't have unit tests for checking in such case...;-)). |
onetom 17-Apr-2011 [9808x7] | hm... i miss the "restful" routing layer :) |
i would like to have rebol files with an object in them -- like asd.r qwe.r -- returned as json via the path /asd and /qwe | |
i was thinking making a webapp which returns on-page-end the to-json context load rejoin [%. request/parsed/file %.r] | |
but i get a 404 in an earlier step, i guess | |
i have a couple of ideas how to hack this, but what would be the "correct" way? | |
capturing 404 doesn't work because it won't know the url of the original request | |
hmm.. now how can i write a module for the binary version of cheyenne? can i? | |
Kaj 17-Apr-2011 [9815x2] | I think the original URL should be in the INTERNAL_REFERER header. At least that's how I'm using it in my situation |
That's with the (REBOL) CGI interface. I don't know if there's an easier way in RSP | |
GrahamC 18-Apr-2011 [9817] | I made a start on a mod-rest but can't access it at present .. looks like the server has changed ip address behind nat |
onetom 18-Apr-2011 [9818] | how can i disable the caching of .rsp files? |
Dockimbel 18-Apr-2011 [9819] | You can't. Why would you need that? |
onetom 18-Apr-2011 [9820x9] | because im modifying the rsp source and i don't want to reload the server every time |
sometimes it seems it can detect the file change, sometimes it doesn't.. is cheyenne checking the modification date of the source file | |
? | |
ok, now, i have a more interesting problem | |
the POSTed and the QUERY-STRING seems to be concatenated in the request/content | |
i value the intent of handling the variables in these 2 places in a uniform way, but concatenating them at the raw level doesn't make much sense | |
this is my rsp: <% print to-string request/content %> | |
and this is the http request: curl -d '{"a": 1, "b": 2}' http://localhost:8080/?test | |
i wouldn't be happy to start a separate webserver just for a dumb rebol-json gateway | |
Dockimbel 18-Apr-2011 [9829x4] | Cheyenne is checking the modification date and reloads the source if the timestamp changed. |
json.rsp: <% print to-string request/content %> >> probe read/custom http://localhost/json.rsp[POST {{"a": 1, "b": 2}}] connecting to: localhost {{"a": 1, "b": 2}} | |
concatenating them at the raw level doesn't make much sense ?? Cheyenne doesn't do. | |
<Cheyenne doesn't do that.> | |
Endo 18-Apr-2011 [9833] | I think onetom uses POST and GET at the same time. |
Dockimbel 18-Apr-2011 [9834] | >> probe read/custom http://localhost/json.rsp?test[POST {{"a": 1, "b": 2}}] connecting to: localhost {{"a": 1, "b": 2}test} Ok, I see the issue now. |
onetom 18-Apr-2011 [9835] | wow, thx |
Dockimbel 18-Apr-2011 [9836] | Also, the "concatenation" is done by your TO-STRING in your RSP, you should use MOLD instead to print REBOL blocks. |
onetom 18-Apr-2011 [9837x4] | in the trace logs i saw #{7B2261223A20312C202262223A20327D} as the value of the content field |
ah, that's the parsed/content | |
File = ./to-json.r ** Script Error : body-of has no value | |
i can use third instead of course but why is it not defined? | |
Dockimbel 18-Apr-2011 [9841] | What REBOL version are you using? |
onetom 18-Apr-2011 [9842x2] | onetom ~/p/ob/jsondb $ cheyenne --version 0.9.20.125 |
so i guess im not using an external rebol exe, since i have bind RSP to [ .r ] in my httpd.cfg | |
Dockimbel 18-Apr-2011 [9844x2] | Right, Cheyenne is processing .r with such config. |
Can you <% print system/version %> ? | |
older newer | first last |