World: r3wp

was this talk prepared?

i'll ask max ;)

Refresh worked, audio cuts in and out.

We know Max never finishes anything

not even presentations?

;)

yeah ... I think this is going to never finish

Is the link to teh video feed ON the website?  As in here somewhere? 
 http://devcon2007.rebdocproj.org/index.html

Ah, I see it, in the Sessions page.

yep

Says LIFE as opposed to LIVE.

Carl said he'll discuss R3 licensing/pricing later.. let's hope for 
some fresh air in this area, or I'm afraid R3 will become a specialty 
application for a very narrow user base, with a specific agenda.
3:20 a.m. here.. signing off.. enjoy the rest of the conference.

Goodnight, Terry.

I was actually looking forward to your presentation Reichart... too 
bad for the tech issues.

I am bit concerned if View becomes proprietary.

terry, i exclude that's the case. but we'll see :)

Other than only seeing Maxims ASS, this video is great.  I think 
we can make money for the fetish market that likes French Canadian 
Geek Porn.

that smiley is promising Gab.. l8tr

I'm riding my bicycle with some friends in about 4 hours...at a place 
that two days ago all burned.  We lost something like 300 hectacres.

Los Angeles lost a HUGE resource, Grifith Park burned to the ground.

That sounds terrible.

http://www.laist.com/archives/2007/05/09/fires_bring_us_closer_together.php

Was amazing to see teh entire skyline on fire

back... anything about when new info is released on the web on R3?

Gabriele - in what way is AltME a virtual OS?

henrik - i'll ask soon. i think that carl already has all the files 
online.

Henrik - I expect Carl's notes be revealed with his next speach ....

pekr: details are not given yet.

Gabriele - so only the core.dll becomes closed source? What about 
View? All open sourced?

afaik, yes.

240 kb kernel... is this completely barebones and is this bigger 
or smaller than R2?

The idea is to open source a lot, and just keep the low level stuff 
closed, but RT will post something official.

so now Ruby can finally have their View clone? :-) They will take 
rebol.dll, create one function "do-rebol", and voila :-)

it is the dll only, so it's like R2 Core without the OS dependent 
parts

the actual license on code has not been announced.

Henrik - good question. I would like to know, if there is finally 
only one executable, so e.g. View is loadable module/component? Or 
what is the situation. I don't understand the architecture. I can 
imagine new SDK, where you can decide, what you put inside, but there 
are parts like View, external language plug-ins, etc.

so it's hard to say if other languages can take advantage of our 
code (they're probably not smart enough anyway ;)

:-)

one executable - that would be AltMe 3. but developers will have 
more (ie you can have your own exe you compile yourself)

Why not? rebol.dll was already out there on the net with plug-in. 
Jaime posted interface - you could pass it a string with rebol code, 
no?

some components are internal, some external plugins

Gabriele - this is actually good, you know? First Ruby guys will 
think they got View for Ruby, next they will realise, they don't 
actually need Ruby, to just start and use Rebol, so they will drop 
Ruby :-)

I'm a bit confused that REBOL/View == AltME now, so does it mean 
that GUI development is moved away from RT?

Henrik -- Maxim has mentioned your styles for Glayout several times, 
and demoed them.

Said he was up at 04:00 last night, and it took him 20minutes to 
integrate your styles into Glayout.

petr, sure, apps would benefit to have rebol in, but would another 
language do? i don't know. maybe.

(I may have missed this) how many people are in that room?

sunanda, cool :-)

27

How many "dont" speak English?"

all French? ;-)