World: r3wp
[DevCon2007] DevCon 2007
older newer | first last |
Anton 10-May-2007 [669] | <slam!> |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [670] | slam? |
Anton 10-May-2007 [671] | just relaying the sound of the door... |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [672x2] | Ah.........yes. |
The mic in there can get hot. | |
Anton 10-May-2007 [674] | temperature-wise ? you mean it becomes more sensitive with heat ? |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [675] | Sorry, no, a "hot mic" is a mic that swings with volume level...so when there are sharp increases in sound, it clips. |
Anton 10-May-2007 [676] | ahh |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [677x3] | A good trick is to put foam over the mic. |
http://dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=93171 | |
first post is one on a hot mic. | |
Anton 10-May-2007 [680x2] | obviously there must be a solution to this problem already, but I'm just thinking two mics, one soft, one loud, and a "compressor" box that selects the loudest signal which does not clip. |
How would foam help ? Are "loud" sounds typically biased towards the parts of the spectrum foam blocks effectively ? | |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [682] | YEs. Foam knocks of the high freqs |
Henrik 10-May-2007 [683] | I thought foam would only help against wind, popping sounds, etc. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [684x2] | Also cuts down on pink noise and static. |
http://www.dvuser.co.uk/images/img/articles/diy-boom-pole/mic.jpg | |
Henrik 10-May-2007 [686] | oh, that wouldn't work on my headset. would get hair in my mouth. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [687] | Actually, up until a few years ago (when mics got a lot better) they used to have foam covers. |
Anton 10-May-2007 [688] | So you still get a good effect with a new mic ? Do you think the devcon mic is a new one or old one ? |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [689x4] | http://hpbimg.cambrianflyingschool.co.uk/HeadsetTELEXEchelon20sm.jpg |
New mic in France | |
It is pretty good given teh room (which is all walls and windows, not much to absorb sound) | |
So the mic is hot, and the room is hot TOO! | |
Anton 10-May-2007 [693] | ok, so even a newer mic can be helped with foam in this situation. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [694x3] | A big glass room is a nightmare for sound. |
Yes, putting foam over the mic would help a little, but it would also mean that it would not work as well iat a distance. What you really want is a mic wired on the person (which has foam built in), and no mic on the room. | |
So you localize the sound and the source. | |
Henrik 10-May-2007 [697] | I think there is often a problem with the sound being too strained, as if you're holding your nose while talking or it sounds like you have a cold. Mine suffers from that, as well as not handling the pronounciation of P sounds properly. |
Anton 10-May-2007 [698] | A directional mic on the person. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [699x2] | It is actually a omni directional I think, but has a peak range of 1 meter. |
It is called a Lanier Mic | |
Anton 10-May-2007 [701x2] | Henrik, that sounds like it doesn't have a good response. Have you checked a frequency response. |
R. ok, so there's not the problem of pointing the mic to the mouth all the time. | |
Henrik 10-May-2007 [703] | anton, no I haven't. I'm unsure if some of these problems are solvable in software |
Anton 10-May-2007 [704] | I bought a really cheap mic recently - I think it was $3 - and the frequency range is abysmal. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [705x2] | Right, sound is pressure, it falls of with distance, although th edesign itself makes it somewhat directional, it is really not. |
Mics have dropped in price, just like optics for cameras...but $3 is still TOO CHEAP. Pay $50+ and you will get a good mic. I always trust Plantronics for headsets. | |
Anton 10-May-2007 [707] | the Lanier mic obviously has a tight dynamic range. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [708] | I have bougfht maybe several hundred mics and headsets over teh yers. |
Anton 10-May-2007 [709] | Plantronics - noted. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [710x4] | My headset (earbuds) are Etymontics (about $400+) |
I also have Shures (about $500+) I use them for slightly diff purposes. | |
http://www.etymotic.com/ephp/er4.aspx | |
The ER 4 are pretty good. And I like traveling with them. | |
Anton 10-May-2007 [714] | those are out of my price range for the moment, but noted for future reference. :) |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [715] | They dropped in price ($299) so you can get them now for probably $200+, which is a great deal. |
Anton 10-May-2007 [716] | I can go up to around $150 for that sort of thing. |
[unknown: 9] 10-May-2007 [717x2] | I know it is tough to make that jump, but if you care about sound, you can never go back to normal Sony or Panasonic type earburs. |
They also have a -35 dB drop, so they REALLY work well on Planes. | |
older newer | first last |