World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
Maxim 30-Nov-2006 [178x2] | many apps have an explicit config telling it where the fonts are... so they can be auto resolved afterwards. |
why not just have that extra parameter setup as a global word ? then it can be setup within user.r if need be. | |
Cyphre 30-Nov-2006 [180x3] | Yes, that is also possible alternative. We need to decide the final solution soon. Anyway, any useful ideas from 'Linux gurus' are appreciated. |
Geomol: I have found what is the problem with LINE-CAP...it works with ROUNDED keyword instead of ROUND. I need to check with Carl why he decided to use ROUND for LINE-JOIN and ROUNDED for LINE-CAP.... | |
(looks like a typo to me) | |
Geomol 30-Nov-2006 [183x5] | hehe :) |
Should be easy to fix, so that's good. | |
Script to test events: | |
REBOL [ Comment: { Inspired by http://www.rebol.com/how-to/feel.html } ] view/new layout [ across tabs 120 the-box: box 200x200 "Test Events Here" forest feel [ engage: func [face action event] [ ac/text: mold action show ac ty/text: mold event/type show ty of/text: mold event/offset show of co/data: event/control show co sh/data: event/shift show sh ke/text: mold event/key show ke kt/text: mold type? event/key show kt ti/text: mold event/time show ti dc/data: event/double-click show dc ] ] return lbl "action:" tab ac: info 100 return lbl "event/" return lbl "type:" tab ty: info 100 return lbl "offset:" tab of: info 100 return lbl "control:" tab co: led off return lbl "shift:" tab sh: led off return lbl "key:" tab ke: info 100 return lbl "type? key:" tab kt: info 100 return lbl "time:" tab ti: info 100 return lbl "double-click:" tab dc: led off key #"Q" [quit] ] focus the-box do-events | |
I seem to remember, that holding <ctrl>- or <shift>-key under Windows while pressing a mouse-button would be detected. Can anyone verify that? I can't get it to work under OSX. | |
Maxim 30-Nov-2006 [188x2] | yes you get an event with the /shift or /control set to true |
(I didn't test in 2.7.4) | |
Geomol 30-Nov-2006 [190x2] | Maybe it should be the apple-key, that should work as <ctrl>!? hm |
I'll post a comment about it. | |
Maxim 30-Nov-2006 [192] | I guess so. depends... we cannot handle the alt key :-( do mac keyboards have the alt key? |
Henrik 30-Nov-2006 [193] | yes |
Maxim 30-Nov-2006 [194] | ok, so I guess the ctrl and mac keys equate. I'd like to able to handle the alt keys too |
Henrik 30-Nov-2006 [195] | well, in a way they do. there is a ctrl, alt and cmd key. on PC keyboards, the ctrl key handles things that normally is assigned to the cmd key and the ctrl key. this makes it a bit confusing to copy (ctrl-c) things from a terminal on a PC keyboard, whereas the mac keyboard uses cmd-C to copy. in rebol this means that the ctrl functionality in windows should be mapped to cmd on the mac, but if this was to be done right, we'd need a /cmd refinement as well. |
Geomol 30-Nov-2006 [196x2] | Oh, the cmd-key (apple-key) will actually set event/control true, but only for key events. As it is now, I don't think, you can check for control or shift when getting a mouse event. |
Under Windows, is it possible to detect both event/control and event/shift at the same time? | |
Maxim 1-Dec-2006 [198] | yes. |
Henrik 4-Jan-2007 [199] | 2.7.5 is out |
Rebolek 5-Jan-2007 [200] | that was a long week ;) |
Henrik 19-Apr-2007 [201] | Did we lose our must-fix bug list? Was that in Graham's temporary world? |
Pekr 19-Apr-2007 [202] | I bet 3.x is out sooner than anything 2.7 related ;-) Not that I would not like you guys have it, but just hopefully, R3 does not procrastinate as much as 2.7.x, which was supposed to be out - "soon" :-) |
Henrik 19-Apr-2007 [203] | pekr, yes there is probably a little dilemma there. |
Graham 19-Apr-2007 [204] | Still on this world .. I can see it. |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [205] | wow, nice to see the bugfixes for 2.7.6 piling up in RAMBO |
Maxim 24-May-2007 [206x2] | basically not enough food to feed other indians. |
that's my POV anyways. | |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [208] | the wrong bugs being fixed though... I would have preferred looking at hard crashes rather than bugs that can be worked around. |
BrianW 24-May-2007 [209] | I have the same preference, but any sign of life is good. |
Pekr 24-May-2007 [210] | corret rebcode, so that it can be included in 3.x ... forget 2.x |
Maxim 24-May-2007 [211] | I'd really like if rebcode where included in 2.7 but had to be allowed within secure... so it would not be a security issue unless you want to use anything that you trust is ok. all it would need is support for struct and arrays. I feel like I could really optimise a lot fo my code for it. |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [212] | I generally just suffer from many deadends with hard crashes, places that are hard to work around. |
Maxim 24-May-2007 [213x2] | when using rebcode? or 2.7? so far I've had very few real problems.... even within elixir which has a lot of processing going on. |
(in 2.7) | |
Pekr 24-May-2007 [215] | My thoughts are as follows - if we request some small fixes, which can be workarounded, then let's spend RT's development in R3 area. Fix hard crashes and that's it for 2.7 release ... |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [216] | I haven't used 2.7 yet. |
Pekr 24-May-2007 [217x2] | haven't we seen enough of "coming soon"? Why 2.7 one month before R3 is out? |
I regarded 2.7 as kind of experimental release for R3 purposes ... | |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [219] | pekr, I could use stability updates. what if R3 won't be entirely stable until mid 2008? As far as we can see, the internal test period will only be 45 days. It's disheartening to tell customers that they have to deal with the crashes, because there's nothing to do about them. |
Pekr 24-May-2007 [220x3] | yes, crashes, but my impression was, that RT tried to put some experiments into 2.7 .... |
why 'switch change and all that discussion for 2.7? We waste valuable time. 2.6. was ok, it should be fixed, no new things tried .... | |
how do you feel about latest incarnation of your favorite tool, which introduced some new things? IMO it was not necessary ... | |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [223] | Well, that depends on the workload for Carl. If they have to test R3 stuff in R2.7, I'm fine with that. Besides I suspect that R2 won't be going away until at least a year from now. We simply don't know whether R3 will be stable enough in its first incarnation for production use. R2 is stable enough as long as you stay with smaller and simpler things that aren't graphics heavy. I tend to bend that rule a bit. :-) |
Pekr 24-May-2007 [224] | that sounds like nonsense to me, Henrik ;-) What you say contradict itself. |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [225] | I said that R2 is stable enough as long as you stick to small programs. I bend that rule. |
Pekr 24-May-2007 [226] | do you need some experiments in 2.7? Or just what you need is as much stable branch of 2.x generation to live for some time? |
Henrik 24-May-2007 [227] | that depends if the experiments affect stability. are the rebcode releases unusually unstable, because rebcode is included? |
older newer | first last |