World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
Maxim 27-Nov-2006 [28] | true! |
Chris 27-Nov-2006 [29] | REBOL/View 2.7.2.3.1 25-Nov-2006 |
Henrik 27-Nov-2006 [30] | same here |
Maxim 27-Nov-2006 [31] | me too |
Chris 27-Nov-2006 [32x3] | Also, in the editor window, hitting the 'home' key produces a null character, and 'end' does nothing. |
Nor Page Up/Down. | |
I guess it's early days :) | |
Henrik 27-Nov-2006 [35x3] | I'm putting the DO/LOAD thing on the blog |
done | |
OSX version is out | |
Geomol 27-Nov-2006 [38] | Nice! I'll start doing some tests with View and OSX in the next days hopefully. |
Henrik 27-Nov-2006 [39x2] | yet another build, this time with timers |
my rotation zoomer finally works under OSX :-) A dream come true. but the colors are screwed! | |
ICarii 27-Nov-2006 [41x2] | do the timers exist in the win2.7.4 build or only the osx build? couldn't seem to find any relevant ? timer* info.. |
or by timers is carl just referring to the VID based rate/time events rather than a Core accessible timer? | |
Gabriele 28-Nov-2006 [43] | face/rate. afaik that didn't work in some osx builds. |
Oldes 28-Nov-2006 [44] | will be the rate finally increased? |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [45] | timers work alright. several demos in the Public/Demos directory use timers |
Rebolek 28-Nov-2006 [46] | Oldes? do you mean under Windows? That would be great. |
Oldes 28-Nov-2006 [47] | Henrik: I know, one of these is mine...but there was(is) inbuilt limit how fast the rate can be. |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [48x2] | looks like the windows version is at 2.7.4 now |
still has the DO/LOAD bug... | |
Pekr 28-Nov-2006 [50] | I think we started really strange route. Now we will have nice toy to play with, spend our time, introducing new bugs, whereas 3.0 slips further in the schedule, as RT has to correct bugs present with 2.7 and its changes ... |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [51] | pekr, did you read the latest 3.0 blog entry? |
Pekr 28-Nov-2006 [52x2] | yes, and? |
that blog was probably provoked by my earlier comment in the blog ... at least Carl confirmed, that 2.7 will see only mostly those changes, which could be used as a codebase for 3.0 too ... | |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [54] | I'm not sure what you mean by slipping. I wouldn't expect 3.0 to be usable for production work within a year anyway (I think I mentioned that before) |
Pekr 28-Nov-2006 [55] | 2.7 consumes RTs time probably anyway, not sure it is worth it, because as we can see, we are introducing new inconsistencies/bugs |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [56x2] | so holding off 3.0 for a few weeks to get 2.7 out, gets my approval, particularly if some of my bugs are fixed :-) |
well, it's not done yet so those inconsistencies might be ironed out. | |
Pekr 28-Nov-2006 [58] | I feel the other way around - produce 2.7 instead of 2.6.3 bugfix release, because posponning of R3 is already planned ... |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [59x2] | I'm just glad that there will be updates to the 2.x branch |
R3 can come when it's finished :-) | |
Anton 28-Nov-2006 [61] | I am very happy with some of the bug fixes. Anyway, it's good the new compiler is being tested out. |
Pekr 28-Nov-2006 [62x2] | Then I hope final browser plug-in will be released too ... containing new security model too ... etc. :-) Henrik - the thing is, that I did not expect R3 to come "so late" (whatever late means here :-), as it was expected to come in June as alpha :-) My idea was simple - new architecture means lots of changes, but also changes for good - lots of open sourced code, probably even new security scheme, open sourced plug-in etc. - so those skilled could help. |
I did not expect it to come in a year. If so, then of course 2.7 still makes a lots of sense ... | |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [64x2] | I'm of course expecting an R3 alpha to come out sooner than a year, but I wouldn't expect or rely on having a production level R3 within a year. If it comes sooner than that, then fine. :-) |
Desktop Help window still says Copyright 2001 - 2005. Maybe it should be a global string in system? | |
Maxim 28-Nov-2006 [66] | and who is saying its delaying R3 ;-) Carl is not alone working on it... maybe the ball is in someone else's hands ATM. |
Gregg 28-Nov-2006 [67] | I think doing all these new builds is a good thing in at least one regard; if it gets RT into the habit of doing quick builds and releases, it will be much better when early R3 builds come out. That is, if it becomes habit, and the tools are there to make it easy to deploy new builds, we'll make much better progress testing R3. |
Rebolek 28-Nov-2006 [68] | I'm just afraid this behaviour will fade out just like every promising thing in the past (RT Q&A thursday and so on). |
Maxim 28-Nov-2006 [69] | Carl needs more indians. |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [70] | would those be little indians or big indians? |
Maxim 28-Nov-2006 [71] | hahaha we truely are geeks ;-) |
Geomol 28-Nov-2006 [72x2] | I've posted this bug in the comments to 2.7.4 OSX build, but I'll repeat it here, in case it's being seen here first. It's a colour problem, when transforming in the DRAW dialect. Code example: i: make image! [100x100 255.0.0] draw i [pen green line 10x10 90x90] view layout [box effect [draw [image i transform 0 -30x-20 2 2 0x0 image i]]] |
Do you guys see the same result in this script: do http://www.fys.ku.dk/~niclasen/rebol/test/transform.r if you try it on Mac, Windows and Linux (or any other View version supporting the DRAW dialect). The circle, line and triangle should be lined up. | |
ICarii 28-Nov-2006 [74] | They are lined up here, circle then line then triangle. |
Geomol 28-Nov-2006 [75x2] | ICarii, using what OS and what version of View? |
In new 2.7.4 build for OSX: >> do http://www.rebol.com/speed.r ** Script Error: query has no value ** Where: halt-view ** Near: querying: to logic! query Is networking turned off or something? It seems, I can't run any script over the net with this latest 2.7 build on OSX. It works with old REBOL/View 1.3.2 Core 2.6.3 build. | |
Henrik 28-Nov-2006 [77] | the bug is known. |
older newer | first last |