r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases

Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[28]
true!
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[29]
REBOL/View 2.7.2.3.1 25-Nov-2006
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[30]
same here
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[31]
me too
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[32x3]
Also, in the editor window, hitting the  'home' key produces a null 
character, and 'end' does nothing.
Nor Page Up/Down.
I guess it's early days :)
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[35x3]
I'm putting the DO/LOAD thing on the blog
done
OSX version is out
Geomol
27-Nov-2006
[38]
Nice! I'll start doing some tests with View and OSX in the next days 
hopefully.
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[39x2]
yet another build, this time with timers
my rotation zoomer finally works under OSX :-) A dream come true. 
but the colors are screwed!
ICarii
27-Nov-2006
[41x2]
do the timers exist in the win2.7.4 build or only the osx build? 
 couldn't seem to find any relevant ? timer* info..
or by timers is carl just referring to the VID based rate/time events 
rather than a Core accessible timer?
Gabriele
28-Nov-2006
[43]
face/rate. afaik that didn't work in some osx builds.
Oldes
28-Nov-2006
[44]
will be the rate finally increased?
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[45]
timers work alright. several demos in the Public/Demos directory 
use timers
Rebolek
28-Nov-2006
[46]
Oldes? do you mean under Windows? That would be great.
Oldes
28-Nov-2006
[47]
Henrik: I know, one of these is mine...but there was(is) inbuilt 
limit how fast the rate can be.
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[48x2]
looks like the windows version is at 2.7.4 now
still has the DO/LOAD bug...
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[50]
I think we started really strange route. Now we will have nice toy 
to play with, spend our time, introducing new bugs, whereas 3.0 slips 
further in the schedule, as RT has to correct bugs present with 2.7 
and its changes ...
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[51]
pekr, did you read the latest 3.0 blog entry?
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[52x2]
yes, and?
that blog was probably provoked by my earlier comment in the blog 
... at least Carl confirmed, that 2.7 will see only mostly those 
changes, which could be used as a codebase for 3.0 too ...
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[54]
I'm not sure what you mean by slipping. I wouldn't expect 3.0 to 
be usable for production work within a year anyway (I think I mentioned 
that before)
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[55]
2.7 consumes RTs time probably anyway, not sure it is worth it, because 
as we can see, we are introducing new inconsistencies/bugs
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[56x2]
so holding off 3.0 for a few weeks to get 2.7 out, gets my approval, 
particularly if some of my bugs are fixed :-)
well, it's not done yet so those inconsistencies might be ironed 
out.
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[58]
I feel the other way around - produce 2.7 instead of 2.6.3 bugfix 
release, because posponning of R3 is already planned ...
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[59x2]
I'm just glad that there will be updates to the 2.x branch
R3 can come when it's finished :-)
Anton
28-Nov-2006
[61]
I am very happy with some of the bug fixes. Anyway, it's good the 
new compiler is being tested out.
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[62x2]
Then I hope final browser plug-in will be released too ... containing 
new security model too ... etc. :-) Henrik - the thing is, that I 
did not expect R3 to come "so late"  (whatever late means here :-), 
as it was expected to come in June as alpha :-) My idea was simple 
- new architecture means lots of changes, but also changes for good 
- lots of open sourced code, probably even new security scheme, open 
sourced plug-in etc. - so those skilled could help.
I did not expect it to come in a year. If so, then of course 2.7 
still makes a lots of sense ...
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[64x2]
I'm of course expecting an R3 alpha to come out sooner than a year, 
but I wouldn't expect or rely on having a production level R3 within 
a year. If it comes sooner than that, then fine. :-)
Desktop Help window still says Copyright 2001 - 2005. Maybe it should 
be a global string in system?
Maxim
28-Nov-2006
[66]
and who is saying its delaying R3  ;-)  Carl is not alone working 
on it... maybe the ball is in someone else's hands ATM.
Gregg
28-Nov-2006
[67]
I think doing all these new builds is a good thing in at least one 
regard; if it gets RT into the habit of doing quick builds and releases, 
it will be much better when early R3 builds come out. That is, if 
it becomes habit, and the tools are there to make it easy to deploy 
new builds, we'll make much better progress testing R3.
Rebolek
28-Nov-2006
[68]
I'm just afraid this behaviour will fade out just like every promising 
thing in the past (RT Q&A thursday and so on).
Maxim
28-Nov-2006
[69]
Carl needs more indians.
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[70]
would those be little indians or big indians?
Maxim
28-Nov-2006
[71]
hahaha  we truely are geeks  ;-)
Geomol
28-Nov-2006
[72x2]
I've posted this bug in the comments to 2.7.4 OSX build, but I'll 
repeat it here, in case it's being seen here first. It's a colour 
problem, when transforming in the DRAW dialect. Code example:

i: make image! [100x100 255.0.0]
draw i [pen green line 10x10 90x90]

view layout [box effect [draw [image i transform 0 -30x-20 2 2 0x0 
image i]]]
Do you guys see the same result in this script:
do http://www.fys.ku.dk/~niclasen/rebol/test/transform.r

if you try it on Mac, Windows and Linux (or any other View version 
supporting the DRAW dialect). The circle, line and triangle should 
be lined up.
ICarii
28-Nov-2006
[74]
They are lined up here, circle then line then triangle.
Geomol
28-Nov-2006
[75x2]
ICarii, using what OS and what version of View?
In new 2.7.4 build for OSX:
>> do http://www.rebol.com/speed.r
** Script Error: query has no value
** Where: halt-view
** Near: querying: to logic! query


Is networking turned off or something? It seems, I can't run any 
script over the net with this latest 2.7 build on OSX. It works with 
old REBOL/View 1.3.2 Core 2.6.3 build.
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[77]
the bug is known.