World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [472] | Too closed. We can use the R3 development infrastructure for R2 releases. That means here, chat, CureCode. |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [473] | Ok, just a little background info/goals: |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [474] | we can pull the data in from there then. |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [475] | 1. I would like to release this week. 2. BrianH will set the priorities. 3. I can post any code needed to fix problems. But, if you make a change, be sure to test it really well. I do not have the time to test. 4. We can release again next month, and each month after that. |
Terry 28-Dec-2009 [476] | What do you mean by "remove the restrictions on the special features in View" |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [477] | Right now it requires a license key for special features. |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [478] | That release schedule sounds good to me. That way we can triage and schedule changes. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [479] | rebcmdview ? |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [480] | Last year we sold very few View/Pro licenses (maybe 2?) People buy the SDK or Command. |
Steeve 28-Dec-2009 [481] | SSL and other protocols will come from the SDK too ? |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [482] | Is there any difference between the free View now and Pro ?? |
Terry 28-Dec-2009 [483] | Without sounding too critical, it's taken this long to make what seems to be THE most important decision in the last 10 years? (IMO) |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [484x2] | G: no diff, just license key. |
T: I agree. Sorry. | |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [486] | Sorry, I thought you released all the pro features a while ago ... |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [487x2] | S: SSL, not sure about others. |
G: did we? | |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [489x2] | That was my impression ... sound ports, library calls |
that was part of /Pro and is now free | |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [491] | Good, then mainly SSL. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [492] | The only significant thing you can do now is release SSL and OBDC free |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [493] | What is the reason to do R2 release in current time-frame, when we are supposed to be heading for R3 beta? |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [494] | Ok, on ODBC. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [495] | Encryption ports ... |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [496] | Pekr, promises made. |
Terry 28-Dec-2009 [497] | DLL access? |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [498] | Pekr, because R3's compatibility policy depends on continued support of R2. |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [499] | Terry - DLL and Shell were released long time ago. |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [500] | Believe me, I do not want to take extra time away from R3 beta, but also, I did not want to delay R2 this long. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [501] | Yes .. |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [502] | The only thing left in /Command is - fastcgi, SSL, ODBC, mySQL? |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [503] | so, just release a license ?? |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [504] | And Oracle (does anyone use that?) |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [505] | if SSL and ODBC would be released for free, it would make many folks happy ... |
Terry 28-Dec-2009 [506] | Larry Ellison? |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [507] | B: on O, yes. Odd as it seems. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [508] | simplest thing to do is just release a license ... |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [509] | BrianH, Carl ... under Windows, many DBs are just used via ODBC drivers ... |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [510] | Graham, let's do it right. |
Terry 28-Dec-2009 [511] | Of course, you could make some real headlines, and just BSD the whole thing. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [512x2] | BrianH ..doing it right might mean a wait for a long time |
Carl was also suggesting releasing a license to IOS .... | |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [514] | No it won't take long - it's just a matter of removing the license code and doing a rebuild. |
Will 28-Dec-2009 [515] | please, fix this 300ms delay ! timer [call/wait "echo 1"] 1 ; 0:00:00.301731 timer [call/wait "echo 1"] 1 ; 0:00:00.301543 |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [516] | And if it does take long, we can do it right next month and do your approach now. |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [517] | W: in windows or Linux? |
Will 28-Dec-2009 [518x2] | os x but geomol ryoed on linux I think a swell |
ryoed -> tryied | |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [520] | there might be a reason why there was such delay put into REBOL? |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [521] | W: I've posted the C source to Call a few times, but no one has ever offered any fixes. |
older newer | first last |