r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases

BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[472]
Too closed. We can use the R3 development infrastructure for R2 releases. 
That means here, chat, CureCode.
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[473]
Ok, just a little background info/goals:
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[474]
we can pull the data in from there then.
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[475]
1. I would like to release this week.
2. BrianH will set the priorities.

3. I can post any code needed to fix problems. But, if you make a 
change, be sure to test it really well. I do not have the time to 
test.
4. We can release again next month, and each month after that.
Terry
28-Dec-2009
[476]
What do you mean by "remove the restrictions on the special features 
in View"
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[477]
Right now it requires a license key for special features.
BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[478]
That release schedule sounds good to me. That way we can triage and 
schedule changes.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[479]
rebcmdview ?
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[480]
Last year we sold very few View/Pro licenses (maybe 2?)  People buy 
the SDK or Command.
Steeve
28-Dec-2009
[481]
SSL and other protocols will come from the SDK too ?
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[482]
Is there any difference between the free View now and Pro ??
Terry
28-Dec-2009
[483]
Without sounding too critical, it's taken this long to make what 
seems to be THE most important decision in the last 10 years? (IMO)
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[484x2]
G: no diff, just license key.
T: I agree. Sorry.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[486]
Sorry, I thought you released all the pro features a while ago ...
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[487x2]
S: SSL, not sure about others.
G: did we?
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[489x2]
That was my impression ... sound ports, library calls
that was part of /Pro and is now free
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[491]
Good, then mainly SSL.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[492]
The only significant thing you can do now is release SSL and OBDC 
free
Pekr
28-Dec-2009
[493]
What is the reason to do R2 release in current time-frame, when we 
are supposed to be heading for R3 beta?
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[494]
Ok, on ODBC.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[495]
Encryption ports ...
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[496]
Pekr, promises made.
Terry
28-Dec-2009
[497]
DLL access?
BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[498]
Pekr, because R3's compatibility policy depends on continued support 
of R2.
Pekr
28-Dec-2009
[499]
Terry - DLL and Shell were released long time ago.
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[500]
Believe me, I do not want to take extra time away from R3 beta, but 
also, I did not want to delay R2 this long.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[501]
Yes ..
Pekr
28-Dec-2009
[502]
The only thing left in /Command is - fastcgi, SSL, ODBC, mySQL?
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[503]
so, just release a license ??
BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[504]
And Oracle (does anyone use that?)
Pekr
28-Dec-2009
[505]
if SSL and ODBC would be released for free, it would make many folks 
happy ...
Terry
28-Dec-2009
[506]
Larry Ellison?
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[507]
B: on O, yes. Odd as it seems.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[508]
simplest thing to do is just release a license ...
Pekr
28-Dec-2009
[509]
BrianH, Carl ... under Windows, many DBs are just used via ODBC drivers 
...
BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[510]
Graham, let's do it right.
Terry
28-Dec-2009
[511]
Of course, you could make some real headlines, and just BSD the whole 
thing.
Graham
28-Dec-2009
[512x2]
BrianH ..doing it right might mean a wait for a long time
Carl was also suggesting releasing a license to IOS ....
BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[514]
No it won't take long - it's just a matter of removing the license 
code and doing a rebuild.
Will
28-Dec-2009
[515]
please, fix this 300ms delay !
  timer [call/wait "echo 1"]
1
;   0:00:00.301731
  timer [call/wait "echo 1"]
1
;   0:00:00.301543
BrianH
28-Dec-2009
[516]
And if it does take long, we can do it right next month and do your 
approach now.
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[517]
W: in windows or Linux?
Will
28-Dec-2009
[518x2]
os x but geomol ryoed on linux I think a swell
ryoed -> tryied
Pekr
28-Dec-2009
[520]
there might be a reason why there was such delay put into REBOL?
Carl
28-Dec-2009
[521]
W: I've posted the C source to Call a few times, but no one has ever 
offered any fixes.