World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
Steeve 28-Dec-2009 [522] | yes i think so |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [523] | Well, it is quite possible that fixes got lost-in-reply. |
Will 28-Dec-2009 [524] | BrianH please? 8-) |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [525] | People need to nag me more if they contribute a fix, and it gets lost. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [526x2] | BrianH .. a public license means that everyone gets ssl, odbc, oracle, encryption today without waiting for a new build. |
I don't know though if such a license would also be usable for the SDK ... which Carl may not want to do . | |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [528] | P: there is no reason for such a delay. But, then, the code is not at all simple. If you've ever seen it, you would vomit. (PS: I did not write it.) |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [529] | :-) I do remember - over 1200 lines of code ... but at least "it works", and in R3 'call is almost unusable ... |
Will 28-Dec-2009 [530] | 300 ms is a lot of time in response time when using call/wait or call/output in a Cheyenne rsp. Please fix it! |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [531] | So, BrianH, have you summarized the priorities in r2-beta yet ? :) |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [532] | Is RAMBO still active? Many bugs probably there. I wonder if over the time (depends on how long we want to continue to maintain R2 family of products) we should port it to CureCode? |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [533] | Will, that "echo" calls a cmd.exe internal command on Windows. Might that be part of the delay? |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [534] | I agree with Graham - R2 is so wide field, that we should move the project to R2-beta world, which is already well established ... |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [535] | Give me a little time to go over them, I should have a list by this evening. I'm at work today. |
Will 28-Dec-2009 [536] | timer [call/wait "print 1"] 1 ; 0:00:00.301498 |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [537] | >> timer [call/wait "print 1"] 0:00:00.031 |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [538] | >> t1: now/precise call/wait "print 1" t2: now/precise print difference t2 t1 0:00:00.082 |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [539] | Using R2Beta should be fine for this week, but we need to switch over to using the R3 development infrastructure before the release next month. We won't have the time and effort available for monthly releases if we can't share resources. The rapid releases of R3 are only possible because of the R3 development infrastructure. |
Will 28-Dec-2009 [540] | humm.. than the beahaviour is on nix only |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [541x2] | release this week .... |
is point #1 | |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [543] | Yep. |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [544x2] | Yes. And fixing the installer is one of the top priorities for this release. |
It hasn't worked at all for the 2.7 series, and worked incorrectly before then. | |
Henrik 28-Dec-2009 [546] | I see a consistent 0.1 second delay in Snow Leopard. |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [547] | B: Yep. Not a good thing for new users. |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [548] | What about VID? IIRC, you, Anton, Henrik, were working on some resizing or fixes? I just hope we will not make View incompatible with existing scripts in the last generation of R2 productline? |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [549x2] | fedora>> timer [call/wait "echo 1"] 1 0:00:00.304267 |
PS: need a better error msg for: ** User Error: Bad face in screen pane! (happens when opening view via ssh - due to non X envr.) | |
BrianH 28-Dec-2009 [551x2] | Pekr, not in this release. We don't have the time to test such things. Once we switch to the community development infrastructure this can be done much easier. |
Must run now, work beckons, be back later. | |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [553] | So, what's the verdict? Wait first for a new build or a public license code release? |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [554] | Graham - wait for the debate to reapper in 2012 :-) |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [555] | I would hope R2 is no longer in use in 2012 ... |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [556] | It will be a build. Even if just a few changes. Must go. BBL. |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [557] | 2.7.7 release Call dockimbel: About CALL console window issue, the CreateProcess( ) win32 call has flags to hide the window. There just need to be set. In the STARTUPINFO used by CreateProcess( ), just set in dwFlags, the STARTF_USESHOWWINDOW flag and set wShowWindow to SW_HIDE. maybe add a new refinement and let the users decide when they want to see the console window ? or maybe just /show Paul: Run is not enabled Graham Is anyone concerned that shell windows opened in Encap do not contain the correct window title? Rambo #3660 ( reported march 2005 ) Brian For me, the big question is what kind of release we will be doing: - 2.7.7: Patching glaring bugs in a few natives, VID fixes, and continuing the backports and mezzanine fixes. - 2.8.0: Backporting some of the R3 native changes (function, not infrastructre), and the above. I think that the decision a long time ago was to focus on R3 as a priority, and just patch up R2 as necessary. At the very least, I would want a 2.7.7 to have a version that fixes post-2.7.6 mezzanine bugs, and 2.7 series regressions vs. 2.6.3. Henrik We also need to implement BrianH's new window resize scheme. Ashley,Anton, Brian, etc ... VID fixes Graham Fixes to prot-http to support put etc. BrianH SQL_FLOAT and SQL_REAL are converted the same way, just with different sizes. And yet SQL_REAL works and SQL_FLOAT doesn't, at least with SQL Native Client (an ODBC 3.5 driver). Perhaps that difference can point you in the right direction. Henrik view/new make face [] a: open/binary/direct/no-wait tcp://:9000 forever [wait reduce [ a 0.001]] This produces a 16 byte leak when started. And when I move the window and click in it, I get a lot of 64 byte leaks. |
Carl 28-Dec-2009 [558x3] | Will: in 2.7.7.4.2: >> timer [call/wait "echo 1"] 1 0:00:00.037984 |
This is from a change I made in the timeout period of the io pipe handler. | |
However, I am unsure of the general impact it may have. It causes the io pipes to be polled 10x faster than before... which may not be a good thing. | |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [561] | Multitouch support in View ... |
Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [562] | :-) |
joannak 28-Dec-2009 [563] | Adding SSL to Vid is among the things I'd like to see. Does not need to be fast (C-code), but nowdays many sites don't allow email/ftp:s without some kind of TLS or similar.. (Not my specialty, please don't ask me to implement) :) |
amacleod 28-Dec-2009 [564x2] | SSL would allow google mail use...I believe??? |
I think someone has google mail working with rebol command | |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [566x2] | It is me |
And hotmail .. which is also ssl | |
amacleod 28-Dec-2009 [568x2] | ofcourse |
Opening up use of google mail would be big for me.. | |
Graham 28-Dec-2009 [570] | don't you have the sdk?? |
amacleod 28-Dec-2009 [571] | yes |
older newer | first last |