World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [622x2] | The R2/forwards stuff is all tested ?? |
can you post a release so we can test it if not? | |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [624] | Yes, and the most recent release is already in R3 chat. The installer can be fixed in an evening at most. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [625] | for those of us not in R3 chat ... |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [626] | ...you'll be left out of 2.7.8 development. Get in there. |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [627] | As for installer, me, as a fan of copy&run principle, I would like simple option as Altme client has - on first screen, please allow "run from current location", and never ask again ... |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [628] | Pekr, that won't work with windows 7 |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [629x2] | ... I expect that when you lauch .exe on system where REBOL is not yet installed, the installation process will run, right? |
no? | |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [631] | That is the portable app method, which can't set file associations. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [632] | Nope ... |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [633] | Hmm, installers, default dirs, etc., that's kind of deep topic :-) |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [634] | Which I've already thought through. I've written installers for R2 before and other apps. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [635] | To get altme to run from the my c:\altme directory, I either have to run as admin, or, I have to write enable myself on the directory |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [636x2] | Right. That's why portable apps are usually run from USB keys with FAT filesystems. |
In the long run I would prefer to make the installer configurable and encappable, but for now a View-specific one will do. | |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [638] | So, rebol has to go to <program files>\rebol ? And it has to write in user documents somewhere? |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [639] | Graham - exactly .... but - I hate that model ... |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [640] | and when you start a rebol console .. you end up deep in user documents somewhere ... |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [641] | there might be even 3 paths - rebol app (program files), rebol cache (user profile .... bla bla \roaming\rebol), rebol data user profile\documents\rebol ... |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [642] | Pekr, it's required for secure multi-user use on Windows. Hating it won't change that. No flame wars please - we don't have the time. |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [643] | most of the time, I can guarantee you, that users feel lost, once they are supposed to navigate to their docs in file-manager ... |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [644] | File placement is easy, and mostly handled by 2.6.3 - the real trick is registry usage. |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [645] | BrianH - I am fine with whatever crap windows require. I have my most needed stuff on C:, in !mp3, !REBOL, !Foto etc. dirs. I run as an admin, so I don't care ... |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [646] | So, if a program that is being installed needs Rebol ... where should it look? |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [647] | Right. File placement is a matter of chosing the default folders of the installer, as it does now. You can change those choices. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [648] | Python seems to install to c:\python2n\ |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [649] | As in almost all cases, Python is a bad example. |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [650] | BrianH: so where can users (not admin) safely put his rebol scripts, so that rebol executalbe can write and read from such a directory? We can't do it in program files, but can we do in somewhere on C:\REBOL? |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [651] | The trick is registry usage. The folder locations can be looked up in the registry.at runtime, as long as those registry settings are in the right location of the registry. I'll have those exact locations Tuesday evening. |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [652] | ... or only user profile dirs is the right placement? |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [653x2] | c:\rebol is out ... unless you write enable |
d:\rebol is fine though :) | |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [655x2] | Pekr, it's not abot where the user can pt their user scripts, it's about the desktop files and such. File associations manage the user script issue. |
User scripts can go wherever you like. | |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [657x2] | will the installer be written in rebol? |
Or, will you use a standard installer script ? | |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [659x2] | It is already. |
It's in the SDK source. | |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [661x2] | And how then will it cope with Windows 64? |
32 bit programs can't write to the windows 64 bit registry | |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [663] | BrianH - but when user script is run, REBOL changes current dir to that of the script placement, no? And the script might require to create some file at that destination. I know that temp files will go to some deep cache dir, but what if script wants to write to the dir of the script placement? |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [664x3] | It will go in the WOW64 "Program Files (x86)" directory. |
Pekr, that is a runtime issue, not affected by the installer at all. | |
For R2, all that matters for install is the View desktop and file associations. | |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [667] | If you have the installer all sorted out .. we should move on to something else! |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [668] | yes, we should all move onto R3 :-) |
Janko 29-Dec-2009 [669] | I can only SAY WOOOW on this release, I am still a strong R2 user and this is much more than appreciated! |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [670] | Yup Graham. For me that should be a little sleep - I have to wake up again in 2 hours to go to a customer site. Pekr, stay on topic :) |
Janko 29-Dec-2009 [671] | Graham: thanks a lot for gmail related code, this was big hinge in some stuff I was planning |
older newer | first last |