World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [728] | That it is. We'll definitely be looking it over :) |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [729] | and Maarten also posted the same bug in 2005 http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3593& |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [730] | Henrik, if your minimal code to replicate the problem is posted somewhere we'd like to see it. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [731] | 2.7.7 release Call dockimbel: About CALL console window issue, the CreateProcess( ) win32 call has flags to hide the window. There just need to be set. In the STARTUPINFO used by CreateProcess( ), just set in dwFlags, the STARTF_USESHOWWINDOW flag and set wShowWindow to SW_HIDE. maybe add a new refinement and let the users decide when they want to see the console window ? or maybe just /show Paul: Run is not enabled Graham Is anyone concerned that shell windows opened in Encap do not contain the correct window title? Rambo #3660 ( reported march 2005 ) Brian For me, the big question is what kind of release we will be doing: - 2.7.7: Patching glaring bugs in a few natives, VID fixes, and continuing the backports and mezzanine fixes. - 2.8.0: Backporting some of the R3 native changes (function, not infrastructre), and the above. I think that the decision a long time ago was to focus on R3 as a priority, and just patch up R2 as necessary. At the very least, I would want a 2.7.7 to have a version that fixes post-2.7.6 mezzanine bugs, and 2.7 series regressions vs. 2.6.3. Henrik We also need to implement BrianH's new window resize scheme. Ashley,Anton, Brian, etc ... VID fixes Graham Fixes to prot-http to support put etc. BrianH SQL_FLOAT and SQL_REAL are converted the same way, just with different sizes. And yet SQL_REAL works and SQL_FLOAT doesn't, at least with SQL Native Client (an ODBC 3.5 driver). Perhaps that difference can point you in the right direction. Henrik view/new make face [] a: open/binary/direct/no-wait tcp://:9000 forever [wait reduce [ a 0.001]] This produces a 16 byte leak when started. And when I move the window and click in it, I get a lot of 64 byte leaks. |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [732] | A code example that doesn't need %rugby.r to replicate woult be nice, |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [733] | oops.. this was an altme bug ... I only highlighted the last paragraph!! |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [734] | Sorry, I already typed that. Thanks. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2009 [735] | BrianH, ok, Carl would know about it, so I'll discuss it with him. Regarding leak, it's in RAMBO, need to find the ID, hang on. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [736] | Henrik .. I just posted it. |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [737] | Next month we'll be migrating RAMBO to CureCode, then retiring it. It's best to continue using it for now though. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2009 [738] | Graham, where? Oddly, I can't find it now. |
Graham 29-Dec-2009 [739] | at the end of my long post |
Henrik 29-Dec-2009 [740] | Ah, there it is. I thought I had put it in RAMBO. |
BrianH 29-Dec-2009 [741] | Later, all! |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [742x2] | Bobik greets you, welcomes R2 continued support, and suggest new naming scheme - we should rename R2 to R2D2 :-) |
is there ODBC equivalent for Linux REBOL? | |
Henrik 29-Dec-2009 [744] | well now.... I just had a crash in 2.7.6. Thought that would be a little on-topic: --------------------------- REBOL Error --------------------------- REBOL Internal Error: Invalid series width 1 was 16 (type 39) Program terminated abnormally. This should never happen. Contact www.REBOL.com with details. --------------------------- OK --------------------------- |
Carl 29-Dec-2009 [745x2] | A string was a block. You will need to provide example code in order to track it down. |
Pekr, R2D2... good one. On ODBC in Linux, was problematic in the past due to no cross-distro standard lib for it. Perhaps that has changed in modern times? | |
Kaj 29-Dec-2009 [747] | There was always a de facto standard ODBC library for Linux, but as always, that doesn't mean it's installed on a system |
Carl 29-Dec-2009 [748] | Ok, thanks Kaj for clarifying it. |
Kaj 29-Dec-2009 [749x2] | That's one of the cases for producing distinct packages for different Linux and BSD systems: that you can specify dependencies |
Other than that, you'd have to include the libraries, and that is also problematic unless you link them statically | |
Robert 30-Dec-2009 [751] | Carl, the crash Henrik reports is from one of our commercial apps. So the code is somehow big. We can provide you with a version of the code, or even better it would help us, if we can get an instrumented R2 version and than provide the output. |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [752x2] | Instrumenting R2 would be a good idea, but is not likely happening in the 2.7.7 release. I'll bring it up with Carl. |
Later, I mean. He can read it now here, but we need to track these things for the long run :) | |
Carl 30-Dec-2009 [754x2] | Gab: your LOAD bug has been fixed for this release. |
Robert: Sounds like a job for REBOL Consulting? | |
Robert 30-Dec-2009 [756] | And that means? |
Carl 30-Dec-2009 [757x2] | www.rebol.com/consulting.html |
There is 1 day left for V2.7 fixes/changes. Please contact BrianH if you have any critical items for this build. You must have test code available to validate any changes. | |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [759] | I will be integrating changes starting this evening (Chicago time, starting 4 hours from now). If you want your fixes in, get them to me before I go to sleep (late) and I'll see what I can do. Code that patches memory should include a version of the function that is supposed to be the result of the patch; we're patching the source, not hotpatching the runtime. |
Graham 30-Dec-2009 [760x2] | Gab. has mentioned an updated imap protocol that might be donated ... dunno if that is still on or not. |
I guess he'll be up in 4 hours or more ... | |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [762] | If it can get to me this evening (which will be for quite a while), it can go in. Otherwise, 2.7.8 next month :) |
Graham 30-Dec-2009 [763] | what time is it for you now? |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [764] | 7:41pm. I'll be up til early morning tomorrow. |
Graham 30-Dec-2009 [765] | Hope you are leaving the installer for last ... |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [766x3] | Yes. And it looks like it might not make the cut for this version, instead doing just a simple fix to make the existing installer work again. To do a full installer revamp would require testing on every Windows platform, and I don't have time to set up all of the VMs required. |
It is likely to make in into the next version a month from now though. | |
R2 2.7.6 SDK sources posted to R3 chat in the appropriate headers. Time to integrate the backwards-compatible R2/Forward changes. | |
Graham 30-Dec-2009 [769] | If you need temporary access to windows 2008, windows 2003 servers, you can start them up in Amazon EC2 |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [770] | Thanks, that will help for next month :) |
Davide 30-Dec-2009 [771] | Brian is it possible to backport that "func" with all words as local ? I don't recall exactly ... maybe "funct" in R3 |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [772] | It's in R2/Forward already. With any luck I'll have enough time to backport the /with option too :) |
Davide 30-Dec-2009 [773] | R2/forward ? Is it a patch ? |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [774] | It's a full rewrite of a lot of the R2 mezzanines, making them less buggy and more R3 compatible. |
Davide 30-Dec-2009 [775] | but it's a separate .r file or a new rebol exe ? |
BrianH 30-Dec-2009 [776] | It's a separate .r file, but its functions can be swapped into the SDK source and a new .exe built. And that is my task for the evening: to swap in the more R2-compatible functions in R2/Forward into the mezzanine source. |
Davide 30-Dec-2009 [777] | Great ! Brian, you are our avatar |
older newer | first last |