World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [872] | Release announcement: http://www.rebol.com/article/0447.html Simple change notes: http://www.rebol.com/docs/v2-7.html I'm trying to post the more detailed release notes in the comments of the announcement blog, but I'm getting caught by the blogger limits. One more message and I'll be done. |
Henrik 2-Jan-2010 [873] | Impressive list of changes. |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [874x2] | And incomplete - I'm waiting for it to let me post again, |
There, the list is done for this release. | |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [876x3] | Why is Carl saying he has released 2.7.7 with TLS ?? |
I use Ladislav's 'closure. Does the one in 2.7.7 supercede this now? | |
Looks like there is no easily accessible documentation for the R2/forward stuff .... | |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [879x3] | There is easily accessible documentation on the R2/Forward stuff: The R3 manual. Any differences from the R3 behavior is documented in extensive code comments in the R2/Forward source, which you can get in R3 (for now) chat, aka DevBase. |
The CLOSURE in 2.7.7 supercedes Ladislav's one, and is derived from it. Go Ladislav go! | |
I don't know much about the TLS support in R2, if any. I guess I'll find out when we migrate the old RAMBO tickets to CureCode. | |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [882x2] | Easy = web accessible. |
I suspect the TLS thing is an error .. unless he has been hiding it from us all these years! | |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [884] | The R3 manual is web accessible. R2/Forward itself is only useful to programmers, and they can and should use DevBase. |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [885] | I went to the wiki .. and searched on funct ... didn't find the docs |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [886] | OK, now that we have 2.7.7 released (even though there is more work to do, i.e. platforms and the SDK), it is time to look ahead to 2.7.8 - which is scheduled for release in one month on February 1. The primary goal of this release is to migrate to REBOL's new development infrastructure. This means: - Migrating the RAMBO database to a new CureCode project and retiring RAMBO. - Using Carl's generation code for the manual to regenerate the R2 manual, so we can start to get to work updating it. - Porting the chat client to R2 using the new functions and building a CHAT function into R2 similar to the R3 version. The R2 chat client might be limited to the ASCII character set, though support for the Latin-1 character set might be possible. Still text mode for now, though if anyone wants to write a GUI client (Henrik?) we can put it on the official RT reb site accessible from the View desktop. The server is accessed through a simple RPC protocol and is designed to be easily scriptable. It turns out that Carl already rewrote the installer for 2.7.something, but it was turned off because of a couple minor bugs that we were able to fix in 2.7.7. With any luck, only minor fixes to the registry usage will be needed and we'll be good to go. As for the rest, it's up to you. Graham seems to have a good tweak to the http protocol, and others may want to contribute their fixes. |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [887] | What's the best way of searching the wiki? |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [888] | Which one, the manual or DocBase? DocBase: http://www.rebol.net/wiki/Main_Page - the manual: http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/ |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [889] | looking at the wrong one .. .I was looking at rebol.net |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [890x4] | Right. The manual is the official docs (which need some work still), and the rebol.net wiki is for community stuff. |
If you want to contribute to R2 development, get on R3 chat. The client is R3-only for now, but the server and message store will be the same when accessed from any other R3 or R2 clients, or web clients if we really want them. | |
For simplicity people refer to it as chat, but the server and message store is really DevBase 3. CHAT is just the name of the function built into R3 (and later R2) that calls a DevBase client script from some web server. | |
I put a full list of my changed and added features in the comments here: http://www.rebol.com/cgi-bin/blog.r?view=0447#comments Once someone tells me where to put it I will put that information on the web. | |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [894x2] | You could create a hyperlink for each of your new functions to the manual pages :) |
Only take you a couple of mins to write the code to do that! | |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [896] | The next version should have support for the links to the online docs right from the R2 command line, just like R3. |
AdrianS 2-Jan-2010 [897] | will the word browser be updated with these for the next version? |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [898x2] | >> cnt == 2 >> cnt == 2 >> val: -- cnt == 2 >> val == 2 >> cnt == 1 |
what's the point of returning the prior value instead of the new value? | |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [900] | Hmm.. Kinda creepy.. but then there is word first+ and not first++ which would be logical.. |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [901] | FIRST+ was made first, a few years ago. ++ and -- were added months later. The prior vale is returned rather than the new value because it is the most useful thing to return. We're aware of the difference from C, but since postfix operations are impossible in REBOL we rather quickly remembered that C compatibility makes no difference to us whatsoever :) |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [902] | Well. those aren't as creepy as those math words in Spin. That one has gone really creative. |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [903] | Spin? |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [904x2] | It's the programming language specially made for Parallax Propeller.. It's speciality is that the bytecode-runtime fits under 2kbyte.. |
Runtime? nah. wrong word.. I shoud say bytecode.-running engine.. | |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [906] | Those are always fun :) |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [907x2] | Just a question of Rebol docs.. (at this point Rebol2 preferred), If I want to find all necessary (and possible) stuff of Serial port, where shoud I look? I woudl like to set various speeds on Serial port, also control DTR line manually.. That kind of stuff is needed on Propeller Downloader since it uses DTR to toggle microcontrollers reset line. And if possible in a way it is portable (no DLLs ?). (page 4 ) http://www.parallax.com/Portals/0/Downloads/docs/prod/prop/PropellerDatasheet-v1.2.pdf |
I know that the Source code is the most obvious place to look, but... Luckily this ain't anything I'd mandatorly need to do since there are some (allmost) ok tools for the chip, but it would be good to know where to look. | |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [909x3] | google ... http://www.rebol.com/docs/changes.html#section-6.3 |
There are two additional port fields that can't be set with a URL, but can be set in a port specification block or by manually changing them. The RTS-CTS field specifies whether hardware handshaking should be used on the port. The default is ON. To change the default, do: ser-port/rts-cts: off update ser-port | |
dunno if that means you can toggle DTR or not. | |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [912] | yep.. I noticed that page too.. And based on that one, it looks like that level of control is not at Rebol. I did that port: open thingy and then ? port ... it gives a huge list of parameters, but most of them seem to be more Ethernet/tcp related than Serial port.. |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [913] | ask Brian if it can be added to Rebol 2.7.8 :) |
BrianH 2-Jan-2010 [914] | Post the request on CureCode once we have a R2 project for it. |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [915] | definitive answer is here http://www.mail-archive.com/[rebol-list-:-rebol-:-com]/msg11178.html |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [916] | Well.. If I had money on it, (or even dream of money) I would.. But that's not the case so it can be,, Holder Kruse? sounds awfully familiar.. |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [917] | He used to work for Rebol Tech, and did the SSL implementation ... and prior to that was an Amiga networking guy |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [918] | Ah.. Now I remember.. Some (many?) years ago people were trying to reach him so that they could register his net stack and get keyocdes.. (or ask him to release it free if he's not willing to sell it anymore).. AFIK neither happened.. Luckily there are some new (PPC) native stacks available. |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [919] | Yep , that was him. |
joannak 2-Jan-2010 [920] | Btw.. he was wrong about using Xon/Xoff instead or HW handshake.. those are used even today and If I had to choose one Id' definitley go hardware. keeps the serial line pure 8.bit, and workd more reliable on multitasking PC:s... |
Graham 2-Jan-2010 [921] | Looks like we do have TLS after all ... :) |
older newer | first last |