World: r3wp
[Games] talk about using REBOL for games
older newer | first last |
xavier 7-Apr-2011 [652] | cool demo oldes |
Oldes 8-Apr-2011 [653] | that's not a demo, it's just a small free (if you want) game. And we are Amanita.. we eat muchrooms;-) |
Endo 8-Apr-2011 [654x2] | That is fantastic! |
still playing :) | |
GrahamC 8-Apr-2011 [656] | I just saw a flame thing ... killed it |
Endo 8-Apr-2011 [657] | just finished.. really fun! it just wow! |
Janko 9-Apr-2011 [658] | I finished it also .. great interactive music/game thing! I love it.. |
Reichart 9-Apr-2011 [659] | Cool, but....................... I must be too old to understand what I was doing.... :( |
Maxim 11-Apr-2011 [660] | its pointless cool, but cool nonetheless. In art it would have been an interactive multi-media project. the fact that its looped re-inforces this even more. |
Maxim 12-Apr-2011 [661x3] | anyone here play GT5.... I'm so pissed off by this game. everytime I play I get aggravated. If anyone here is a game designer this is the game to study about how *not* to build a game. |
from the stupid menu and useless extra screens (which are slow to load, pointless, irritate and can't be turned off), to the cosmically idiotic AI which repeatedly slams your car if you dare get into the driving line until it eventually drives you out of the road wtf?... funny that they don't bounce out... did the authors forget the basic laws of physics... the same force is applied to both objects in a collision. I mean like come one. even GT3, 15 years ago, was more fun and actually felt a lot more real in many things. the braking is ridiculous and many times, cars just spin out of control completely randomly. NASCAR racing is totally bullshit. | |
actually, the GT5 preview game is more fun, hands down, in *every* aspect, except it doesn't have online play. | |
Robert 27-Jul-2011 [664] | Oldes, machinarium is on place 28th in the German OSX App-Store of most bought applications. Great stuff! |
PatrickP61 2-Aug-2011 [665] | To mark the end of the Shuttle program, I want to share this link to one of the best simulators ever. http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ |
Endo 12-Aug-2011 [666] | Reichart: I'm playing "IGoWin" from David Fotland which has good AI (or my "AI" is not good :) ). It is not an online game but you can test yourself with computer. As I heard it plays dan level. http://www.smart-games.com/igowin.exe |
Ladislav 12-Aug-2011 [667x2] | Just tried it, and it does not look like a dan level at all |
It is worse than 9 kyu | |
GrahamC 12-Aug-2011 [669x3] | If you want to play online ... then http://www.playok.com/is an interesting site. I think it's mainly populated by eastern europeans though as they chat in russian and other languages from that region |
I can't comment on the Go levels as I haven't visited that group ... | |
https://plus.google.com/stream/circles/p7f75634d89318aef Games API coming soon to G+ | |
Izkata 13-Aug-2011 [672] | For playing online, http://www.gokgs.com/applet.jspis another place I've been in the past |
Gabriele 13-Aug-2011 [673] | I think that good AI on Go is an unsolved problem still. |
Endo 13-Aug-2011 [674] | Ladislav: Yes I thought that it is not dan level. I'm not good on Go but I mostly win until 2-4 kyu on IGoWin. Gabriele: Many Go player says that you should not play with a computer, instead, play a human. Or start with a higher handicap. Its AI is much more difficult than Chess. |
Reichart 14-Aug-2011 [675] | Endo, that was perfect.! Thank you, it is good enough to "play with" to teach a person the basic play. I was hoping for online version of EXACTLY this. The two online versions appear to be free of A.I. unless I'm missing something. They are lobbies where you can jump into a game with someone. good A.I. is not important to me, just good enough to confirm basic rules, attempt to win, etc. You know, something that could replace any president of any country, that type of thing ~ |
Ladislav 14-Aug-2011 [676] | If you want to try more alternatives, Reichart, then there is the gnugo program, which may be worth a try as well. |
Reichart 14-Aug-2011 [677] | Is there is sig advantage of it over iGoWin? |
Kaj 14-Aug-2011 [678] | Free Software :-) |
Endo 14-Aug-2011 [679] | IGoWin is also free. |
Kaj 14-Aug-2011 [680] | Ah, no, it's not Free |
Endo 14-Aug-2011 [681] | Not free?? I played it for a long time :) |
Kaj 14-Aug-2011 [682] | So? There is no source code and you are forbidden from modifying it |
Endo 14-Aug-2011 [683x2] | oh you mean it is not open source. |
it is freeware but not open source. which is fine with me :) | |
Kaj 14-Aug-2011 [685] | No, I meant what I wrote: Free Software |
Ladislav 14-Aug-2011 [686] | As far as I can tell, iGoWin does not support standard goban dimensions? |
Reichart 14-Aug-2011 [687x3] | Kaj, nothing like a big cup full of hot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation in the morning, eh? You might cut Endo a little slack (and the rest of us) since "free software" can mean several things. No? Endo, So I can beat the game in a few seoncds now, so I assume I'm doing something wrong LOL. As it stands, when you start the game is gives black 5, and white 1. And it is not a 19x19 board. Perhaps this is part of being the "free" version (as in $ LOL)? To win al lone needs to do is draw a single line across the board with the most territory on your side. Done, you won. |
to win all one needs to do | |
... yup, now that I have won a few games, it is offering to sell me the upgrade :) | |
Kaj 14-Aug-2011 [690x3] | Free Software is equally well defined as Freeware and Open Source, so I don't see why I couldn't use the term if Endo is using those: |
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html | |
Anyway, I was just offering an answer to your question | |
Endo 15-Aug-2011 [693x2] | Reichart: computer level stars at 25. kyu, so in first a few games it is so easy to win. after several games when your rank is under 10 it is getting a bit difficult. But if you are a good Go player it may not be difficult for you (as I'm not a good one, I stuck at 2. kyu :) ) But it never offered me an upgrade?? Oh and yes, it is mosly for beginners as its dimension is not 19x19. |
Kaj: I didn't know that the definition of Free Software as you say. I thought that Free Software and Open Source is two different things. Not covering each other. But still I think that Freeware is different: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeware Not to be confused with Free software. -wikipedia So I should say that Freeware is fine with me :) As in old days there were Public Domain, Freeware and Shareware. And none of them was Open Source. | |
Gabriele 15-Aug-2011 [695] | Kaj, the term "Free Software" is very well defined... for people who know about it. In English (thus, for anyone else in the world besides people like us), "Free Software" means software you don't pay for. You could have easily said «I use "free" in the sense of "freedom" not in the sense of "gratis"», instead of trying to confuse Endo more... |
Ladislav 15-Aug-2011 [696] | I'm not a good one, I stuck at 2. kyu - I don't think the sentence makes sense. 2 kyu is quite solid strength. On the other hand, the strength estimates of the program are highly unreliable. |
Kaj 15-Aug-2011 [697x5] | Gabriele, we were discussing a GNU program, which set the context, and I specifically capitalised the term to avoid ambiguity |
Endo, you were right that Free Software and Open Source are two different things: | |
http://opensource.org/docs/osd | |
They don't cover each other, but they do overlap | |
To be honest, I did not try to confuse Endo more, but I did not explain myself further, either, because I wanted to find out if there are really people here who don't know what Free Software is | |
older newer | first last |